Romanian Adoption Policy Examined as Human Rights Issue
Congressional panel criticizes EU adoption ban pressure on Bucharest
By Jeffrey Thomas
Washington File Staff Writer
Washington -- Contemporary child development research shows unequivocally that placing infants in hospital or orphanage
care for longer than 4-6 months permanently damages them in terms of their cognitive, emotional and behavioral
development, an expert witness told a congressional hearing September 14.
“A reasonable estimate is that an infant loses 1-2 IQ points per month and sustains predictable losses in growth as well
as motor and language development between 4 and 24 months of age while living in an institutional environment,” said the
witness, Dr. Dana Johnson, a professor of pediatrics at the University of Minnesota and director of the International
Dr. Johnson’s testimony underscored why the United States Helsinki Commission – a body that monitors human rights issues
– was holding a hearing on the impact of Romania’s newly implemented ban on intercountry adoptions, a ban characterized
by the commission’s chairman as “undeniably a human rights abuse.”
The European Union (EU) also came in for heavy criticism by commission members because of the role it has played in
pressuring Romania to adopt the new law.
Commission Co-chairman Christopher Smith opened the hearing by providing a brief overview of the problem. As a legacy of
Nicolae Ceaucescu’s dictatorial rule, the abandonment of children has been a serious problem in Romania for decades.
Smith cited UNICEF statistics that 9,000 children each year are abandoned in Romania’s maternity wards or pediatric
hospitals, 66 percent of them minority Roma children. “Each year, 1,000 children are adopted domestically while 8,000
children in Romania are being sentenced to a life without knowing family or a parent’s love,” he said.
In 2001, under pressure from the European Union, Romania declared a moratorium on international adoptions, Smith said.
In 2004, Romania enacted a new law on adoptions that effectively bans international adoptions. “This law is based on the
misguided proposition that a foster family, or even an institution, is preferable to an adoptive family outside the
child’s country of birth,” said Smith, a Republican congressman from New Jersey.
Since the declaration of the moratorium in 2001 and the enactment of the new law in 2004, approximately 1,700
international adoptions were registered with the Romanian government but left hanging, including more than 200 with
American families, some of whom were in the hearing room.
Maura Harty, the State Department’s assistant secretary for consular affairs, said the United States is “committed to
fostering an international environment for intercountry adoptions that protects the interests of orphaned and abandoned
children, their birth parents, and American families.”
The assistant secretary expressed “great disappointment” that the United States has failed to make any real progress on
the adoption cases filed during the moratorium despite the fact that President Bush raised the issue with Romanian
President Traian Basescu in March and other American officials have raised it at every opportunity.
“Romanian officials have offered many promises, but there has been little or no follow-through,” Harty said.
“The Romanian Government has asserted that its adoption law and its failure to proceed with pending cases are being
driven by concerns over Romanian accession to the European Union,” she said, adding that the State Department has sought
clarification from the EU on its stance toward Romania’s adoption legislation.
“You can be sympathetic with Romania’s need to join the European Union and still recognize that these adoption laws are
deeply damaging to the lives of thousands of children,” said Helsinki Commission Co-chair Senator Sam Brownback, a
Republican from Kansas. “There has to be a better and more humane way to deal with this problem, and I urge the EU and
Romania to sit down and take seriously the fate of thousands of innocent children and loving families.”
The European Commission was invited to send a representative to testify at the hearing but declined to attend, according
to Co-chairman Smith.
“This is a humanitarian issue, a child welfare issue,” Harty concluded. She said she was flying to Europe in just a few
hours to seek clarity on this issue.
Sorin Ducaru, Romania's ambassador to the United States, read a statement on the issue that he said had been carefully
drafted by his government. According to his statement, the new law effectively banning international adoption “was
drafted together with a group of European Commission experts that provided permanent consultancy, taking into
consideration the provisions of UN Convention on the child’s rights, the Hague Convention on Protection of Children and
… European practices in the field.”
Chairman Smith disputed that Romania’s new adoption law “comports in any way” with the Hague Convention. “The best
interest of the child is to find a loving home,” he said.
“Romania needs the backbone to say to the EU we care more about our children than about accession,” he added.
The other panelists included Thomas Atwood, President & CEO, National Council for Adoption; Debra Murphy-Scheumann, President of the Board of Directors, Joint Council on
International Children’s Services; and Elliot Forsyth, who is waiting to adopt a Romanian child.