Distribution via the Unanswered Questions Wire
Protesting Zelikow's 9-11 Commission at Stanford
Press Release
October 18, 2004
Contact- (protest organizer) Carol Brouillet 650-857-0927
Organizer of the San Francisco International Inquiry into 9-11
Protesting Zelikow, the 9-11 Cover-Up Commission,
Terrorist Attack Exercises & Stanford University’s Role!
Philip Zelikow is scheduled to speak at Kresge Auditorium, Stanford University, Wednesday, October 20, 2004, 4:15- 5:30
PM, at a free public event; protesters are planning to raise questions about Zelikow’s role as Executive Director of the
9-11 Commission. Zelikow, a national security adviser to both Bush administrations, a principal author of the official
9-11 Commission Report, who co-authored a book with Condoleezza Rice, was part of Bush’s transition team for the
National Security Council after the 2000 election, and appointed to the President's Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board
a month after the 9-11 attacks. The Family Steering Committee called for his resignation because of his obvious
conflicts of interests.
While 9-11 has been used to invade Afghanistan, Iraq, shred the Constitution, and Bill of Rights, construct a Global
Police State, enrich weapons manufacturers, seize oil assets; there have been no convictions in any courts of law
supporting the “government conspiracy theory,” particularly the Saddam Hussein/Al Qaeda link.
The 9-11 Commission failed to mention the multiple wargames/exercises that were being conducted that day, out of the
White House. As many as five war game drills were in process, involving hijacked airliners, a plane crashing into a
building, involving false blips deliberately inserted onto FAA and military radar screens. One exercise pulled
significant fighter resources away from the North Eastern United States on September 11th, 2001. These exercises
involved NORAD, the FAA, the Canadian Air Force, the CIA, the National Reconnaissance Office, and, “coincidentally,” in
New York City, massive preparations were underway for a “biochemical attack drill” involving FEMA, the Mayor’s Office of
Emergency Management, the FBI, US Department of Justice, Weill Medical College of Cornell Medical Center, NY Dept. of
Health, NY Fire Dept., NY Police Dept., the American Red Cross, the Port Authority. The Secret Service and Cheney’s
overseeing role during the events of 9-11 were overlooked. (* Michael Ruppert’s book- Crossing the Rubicon- The Decline
of the American Empire at the End of the Age of Oil)
The Commissioners and Zelikow had deep conflicts of interest, and reason to cover-up the truth about 9-11. They are now
engaged in a public relations effort to sell the official “narrative” and “the war on terrorism.”
State Sponsored Terrorism is often masked by “drills” or “exercises;” the US has a long history of training terrorists,
and launching covert operations throughout the world; terrorism allows states to declare emergencies, label all
opposition as “terrorists,” and reduce civil rights.
Sponsoring Zelikow’s talk is Stanford Institute for International Studies. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
has awarded a 15-month $1.65-million contract to CISAC, and the Stanford Institute for International Studies. The
project entails …efforts to improve the design and evaluation of future terrorism exercises of national and local
response systems… The DHS research contract resulted in part from CISAC's observation of the spring 2003 State
Department-DHS sponsored full-scale exercise called TOP OFFICIALS-2 (TOPOFF-2), designed to prepare national, state and
local officials to respond to potential terrorist attacks within the US…. Dean Wilkening, will model uncertainties in
biological weapons use, such as effects caused by different exposure rates and different doses of contaminants like
anthrax."(* from SIIS website- http://siis.stanford.edu)
When the anthrax attacks were traced to US military labs after 9-11, the subject was dropped by the press. Fabricated
terror alerts and fabricated terror attacks are treasonous crimes.
**** ENDS ****
STANDARD DISCLAIMER FROM UQ.ORG: UnansweredQuestions.org does not necessarily endorse the views expressed in the above
article. We present this in the interests of research -for the relevant information we believe it contains. We hope that
the reader finds in it inspiration to work with us further, in helping to build bridges between our various
investigative communities, towards a greater, common understanding of the unanswered questions which now lie before us.