UK: An inquiry into Finucane - but what kind?
Today, the UK authorities have finally announced that an inquiry into the 1989 killing of Patrick Finucane in Northern
Ireland will be established. However, instead of announcing a public judicial inquiry under the Tribunal of Inquiry
(Evidence) Act 1921, the UK authorities have stated that the inquiry will be held on the basis of legislation to be
Amnesty International views this announcement with great suspicion. It states that the Finucane inquiry will require the
introduction of new legislation to take account of "the requirements of national security". In light of this, Amnesty
International strongly suspects that the UK authorities are using "national security" to curtail the ability of the
inquiry to shed light on state collusion in the killing of Patrick Finucane; on allegations that his killing was the
result of an official policy and that different government authorities played a part in the subsequent cover-up of
collusion in his killing.
"With this announcement, the UK authorities are making the 'public interest' subservient to 'national security'.
However, the public interest can only be served by ensuring public scrutiny of the full circumstances of Patrick
Finucane's killing and its aftermath," Amnesty International said today.
A further concern is the fact that in their statement the UK authorities do not commit themselves to setting up a public
inquiry. The failure to set up a public inquiry would amount to reneging on their commitment to fully comply with
Justice Peter Cory's recommendation. In his October 2003 report into the Finucane case, Justice Cory concluded
unequivocally that "only a public inquiry will suffice".
Patrick Finucane, an outspoken human rights lawyer, was shot 14 times in his home in Belfast, Northern Ireland in 1989
by loyalist paramilitaries. His was just one among a number of killings alleged to have been carried out with the
collusion of UK security forces.
In the aftermath of Patrick Finucane’s killing, substantial and credible allegations of state collusion began to emerge
almost immediately. Since then, prima facie evidence of criminal conduct by police and military intelligence agents
acting in collusion with loyalist paramilitaries in the killing has emerged. In addition, allegations have emerged of a
subsequent cover-up by different government agencies and authorities, including the police, the British Army, MI5 (the
UK Security Service, officially "responsible for protecting the UK against threats to national security") and the office
of the Director of Public Prosecutions in Northern Ireland.
In May 2002, the UK and Irish governments appointed Justice Peter Cory - a former Canadian Supreme Court Judge - to
investigate a number of killings in which government security forces were reported to be involved, including the killing
of Patrick Finucane.
Justice Cory submitted his reports in October 2003, but it was not until April 2004 that the UK authorities finally
published them, simultaneously announcing the creation of public inquiries into three cases. However, they refused to
announce a public inquiry into Patrick Finucane's case despite Justice Cory's unequivocal conclusion that in his case
"only a public inquiry will suffice". Instead, the authorities have referred to "set[ting] out the way ahead at the
conclusion of prosecutions".
On 16 September 2004, Kenneth Barrett, a former loyalist paramilitary, was convicted of, and sentenced for, the murder
of Patrick Finucane. His was the only outstanding prosecution arising from the case. Kenneth Barrett’s conviction
removed any purported justification on the part of the UK authorities not to immediately initiate a public inquiry into
the allegations of collusion in Patrick Finucane's killing.