Iraq: Clarification needed on status of prisoners after 30 June
Open letter to the Permanent Representative of the United States of America to the United Nations
His Excellency Mr John D. Negroponte, Permanent Representative of the United States of America to the United Nations
Permanent Mission of the United States of America to the United Nations 799 United Nations Plaza New York, NY 10017
Dear Ambassador Negroponte,
Before the Security Council adopted resolution 1546 (2004) on Iraq, Amnesty International wrote to Council members on 2
June, asking the Council to address several concerns arising from the draft text then before it. Among them was the need
to clarify responsibility for prisoners currently held by the occupying powers, as well as for any prisoners or
detainees to be held by the multinational force under US command after 30 June 2004. As you know, resolution 1546
provides that, after that date, the multinational force (MNF) will have the "authority to take all necessary measures to
contribute to the maintenance of security and stability in Iraq in accordance with the letters annexed to this
resolution". The letter attached to the resolution from Secretary of State Colin L. Powell, specifies that the MNF's
activities will include combat operations against forces resorting to violence
Amnesty International welcomes the commitment of all forces in Iraq, expressed in the resolution, to act in accordance
with international law, including obligations under international humanitarian law. However, we are deeply concerned
that the Security Council failed to ensure that the resolution, or the letters attached to it, clarify what will happen
to the thousands of prisoners currently held by the occupying powers. There is no reference to any legal basis or legal
safeguards that will apply if any future arrests or internment are carried out by the forces of the United States of
America (USA) and other countries contributing troops to the MNF, prominent among them those of the United Kingdom (UK).
Amnesty International notes that "Internment...for imperative reasons of security" is a measure provided for in Articles
42 and 78 of the Fourth Geneva Convention relating to occupa
Resolution 1546 also fails to address how those who have subjected Iraqis to widely reported abuses of international
human rights and humanitarian law or who may do so in future will be held individually accountable, or how that process
will change after the Interim Government of Iraq will assume authority after 30 June 2004. This important question
concerns not only members of the multinational forces themselves, but also contractors working for them who have also
been implicated in abuses in Iraqi prisons, but who have so far not been held accountable.
Unfortunately, both the US and UK forces operating in Iraq have failed to meet their obligations under the Geneva
Conventions as occupying powers and under the human rights treaties to which Iraq is a party to protect detainees and
internees in their custody from torture and ill-treatment, and to grant them the legal safeguards to which they are
entitled. The Council, on its part, has not discharged the special responsibility for these prisoners which it assumed
when it endorsed, in resolutions 1483 and 1511, the specific authorities, responsibilities and obligations under
applicable international law on the part of the USA and the UK, as occupying powers.
Amnesty International is therefore asking the United States of America, as leader of the multinational force operating
under unified command, to clarify whether all those currently held by US forces and those of its partner in the
Coalition Provisional Authority, the United Kingdom, will be released on 30 June 2004. Resolution 1546 states that the
occupation will end on that date. If that is indeed the case, we would expect the occupying powers to release all
prisoners, detainees and internees. They may only be re-arrested by the Iraqi authorities if there are grounds under
Iraqi law, consistent with international standards, to detain them. The observance of the maximum amount of transparency
in respect of all those held by the occupying powers, now and during this period of transition, is particularly
important.
Furthermore, Amnesty International would like to be informed by the drafters of the resolution whether all Iraqi
Prisoners of War, currently held in their custody and entitled to protection under the Third Geneva Convention, will be
released by 30 June 2004, consistent with the declared end of occupation and end of international conflict. If they are
not to be released, Amnesty International requests to be informed where and in whose custody Prisoners of War will be
held, and what protective measures are afforded to them under applicable international law.
Finally, Amnesty International wishes to receive clarification about the respective powers of arrest and detention of
the Iraqi forces and the multinational force in the course of the exercise of the latter's broad powers granted in the
resolution to take "all necessary measures to contribute to the maintenance of security and stability in
Iraq...including by preventing and deterring terrorism". We would appreciate learning which of these parties will
authorize arrests, searches, detentions, or internment, on what legal basis such measures are taken, and at what stage
any detainees or internees taken by the multinational force will be handed over to Iraqi authorities.
Recalling reports of torture of Iraqis not only by the occupying powers but also by the Iraqi police, Amnesty
International would welcome information about the legal and practical safeguards that will apply to arrest, detention
and internment; what access international and Iraqi organizations will have to those held; and whether prisons and
detention centres will be placed under Iraqi government or other control. The international community should know what
measures are in place to ensure that the absolute prohibition of torture and cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or
punishment will be strictly observed by Iraqi, US and other forces. In this respect, we would appreciate knowing your
views about our recommendation that the United Nations should have a specific monitoring mandate to supervise all places
of detention.
We will share the contents of this letter with other Council members, in view of the responsibilities which we believe
they share for the welfare of prisoners and detainees in Iraq. We urge you and all other Council members to request that
the reports of the Secretary-General to the Council on Iraq will include detailed information on the questions raised in
this letter. I would be most grateful to receive your response.
Yours sincerely,
Yvonne Terlingen Amnesty International Representative at the United Nations
Take action - Call for Independent Investigations into War Crimes of Torture in Iraq: http://amnesty-news.c.topica.com/maacmKjaa7Lrqbb0hPub/
Further information - All AI documents on Iraq: http://amnesty-news.c.topica.com/maacmKjaa7Lrrbb0hPub/