Launching 'Development Round' Could Help Poor Countries Facing Global Downturn
While new short-term forecast is gloomy, trade could spur medium-term growth
WASHINGTON, October 31, 2001 — Removing barriers to trade, the topic of WTO meetings in Doha in early November, could
significantly boost the long-term prospects of developing countries, many of which are suffering from the fall-out of
the September 11 attacks and worldwide slowdown. A new World Bank report paints a grim picture of the short-term outlook
for poor nations because of the simultaneous downturn in the US, Europe and Japan. Growth in developing countries is
expected to fall to 2.9 percent in 2001, nearly half the 5.5 percent recorded in 2000. Latin America, East Asia, and
Sub-Saharan Africa are particularly hard hit this year. Nonetheless, if industrial countries begin to recover by
mid-2002, as the report projects, growth in developing countries may edge up to 3.7 percent in 2002.
Reshaping the world's trade system and reducing barriers to trade could accelerate medium-term growth and reduce poverty
around the world, concludes Global Economic Prospects and the Developing Countries 2002: Making Trade Work for the
World's Poor , the Bank's yearly report on prospects for developing countries. Expanding trade could well increase
annual GDP growth by an additional 0.5 percent over the long run - and by 2015 lift 300 million people out of poverty in
addition to the 600 million escaping desperate poverty with normal growth. Developing countries stand to gain an
estimated $1.5 trillion of additional income in the 10 years after liberalization policies are begun; developed
countries would see their incomes rise by some $1.3 trillion.
"To make this happen, the developed countries have to be willing to put agriculture and textiles on the negotiating
table because those are the products that the world's poor produce," says Uri Dadush, Director of the World Bank's
Economic Policy and Prospects Group. "A round that brings down barriers in agriculture, advances the timetable on
textiles, and agrees to curtail antidumping at the same time it takes up the concerns of the industrialized countries
has the potential for being a true 'Development Round."
Trade matters more in today's integrated world than ever before. Indeed, performance in 2002 could be threatened by
lower growth in the volume of world trade if consumers and businesses in industrial countries do not respond to lower
interest rates or net fiscal spending, or if unpredictable events associated with the terror attacks prove disruptive.
"The terrorist attacks put a huge drag on the already sputtering engines of the global economy. What makes this
situation unusually risky is that this is the first time since 1982 that the US, Europe, and Japan have all turned down
at the same time" says Richard Newfarmer, principal author of the report. As a result, growth in trade in 2001 has
undergone one of the severest decelerations in modern times - from 13 percent in 2000 to perhaps 1 percent in 2001.
Developing countries are confronting a 10 percentage point drop in the growth of demand for their exports, seriously
undermining their growth this year. Newfarmer adds, "On the upside, the volume of world export growth is expected to
pick up to 7.2 percent over 2002-3."
The report proposes a four-part policy agenda to "reshape global trade architecture to promote development": launching a
Development Round in the WTO, promoting global cooperation to expand trade outside the WTO, encouraging new policies in
high income countries to provide assistance that will expand trade, and advocating for trade reforms within developing
countries to accelerate development.
Global prospects: short-term risks are high, but long-term prospects are favorable
The outlook for 2002, though subject to unusually high risks, is that the global economy will recover: Developing
countries are expected to grow by 3.7 percent if the external environment holds, up from 2.9 percent in 2001, while it
is expected that the world economy will grow by 1.6 percent.
The report shows that the impacts of the economic downturn on the world's six developing regions vary significantly,
often mirroring export patterns. Countries in Latin America and East Asia, with large manufacturing exports, were the
first to feel the impact of lower import demand in the United States and Japan. The weakness in Europe and declining
commodity prices put additional pressure on countries in Latin America, Central Europe, and Sub Saharan Africa. South
Asia, less integrated into the world economy and with a vibrant service sector, has been less affected by the
deteriorating global environment, while in the Middle East and North Africa oil revenues - which account for almost
two-thirds of the region's export revenues - provide a better short-term outlook than in other regions. Still, because
of the double whammy of simultaneous downturn in US, Europe and Japan and the terrorist attacks, all regions have
suffered slower growth. This is because of the deceleration in trade, drop in tourism, and the higher costs of capital,
as lending to higher risk developing countries has virtually ceased for all but the best borrowers.
The report says that, despite the tough circumstances in 2001, the long-term prospects for developing countries are
promising. This is to a large extent due to improved macroeconomic management, rising savings, increased openness, and
greater diversification. Average per capita growth of 3.6 percent is forecast for 2005-2015 for developing countries and
2.5 percent for high-income nations. Export markets are expected to recover robustly by 2003, but commodity prices may
remain depressed for some time.
"The short-term problems are serious and call for an urgent response. However, the long-term prospects for developing
countries are still bright," notes Nick Stern, the World Bank's Chief Economist and its Senior Vice President. "Since
the crises of the mid 1990s, trade linkages have risen in importance and many developing countries have become less
reliant on the more volatile forms of capital flows. In addition, many developing countries are better equipped to
absorb negative external shocks, given their domestic reforms and their trade diversification. Most important, these
policy improvements justify the expectation that they will return to relatively high growth rates, once the global
economy recovers from the current slowdown. Other developing countries, with weaker policies, have done much less well
in the 1990s - there is a challenge of inclusion."
However, even with these favorable growth prospects in most regions, some could be left behind, making it difficult to
meet development goals of reducing child mortality, halving poverty and raising literacy rates. Non-oil commodity
exporters, countries with high debt levels, and nations with poor credit histories will find themselves at a
disadvantage in trade and financial markets. Sub-Saharan Africa in particular confronts enormous problems in all of
these dimensions - as well as the public health epidemic of AIDS. For these reasons, invigorating the global trade
agenda, granting preferential access to low income countries, and providing aid to expand trade is imperative, even in
these times of uncertainty, the authors stress.
Calling for new trade rules, fewer barriers
Citing the cost of subsidies to agriculture imposed by rich nations, which amount to estimated US$1 billion a day, or
more than six times all development assistance to poor nations, the authors list numerous barriers that adversely affect
developing countries, including subsidies, high tariffs on selected products of developing countries, and tariff codes
of high-income countries that discourage forward processing in developing countries. They call for high income countries
to grant duty-free, quota free access to their markets for the low-income developing countries. Dadush notes, "If the
U.S., Canada and Japan were to follow the lead of the European Union in its "Everything But Arms" preferential access
scheme for the least developed countries, and if the program were enlarged to all low-income developing countries, they
could benefit more from globalization."
Trade in merchandise growth outpaced growth in GDP by nearly 3 to 1 during the 1990s. Data reveal an average annual
increase of 6.3 percent in the volume of global merchandise trade (1990-1999) compared to global GDP growth of 2.1
percent per year over the same period. Exports grew faster than domestic demand in every major region. Yet the poorest
"least developed countries" lagged, in part because the LDCs remain dependent on agriculture and labor-intensive
manufactures. World demand for these products is growing less rapidly and they face trade barriers that are two-three
times those of other products.
According to the report, services trade more than trebled its size in fifteen years to $1.2 trillion in 1999, and now
accounts for a quarter of all cross-border trade. The authors find that liberalizing entry of foreign service providers
would have huge impacts in promoting growth and improving productivity - with effects up to four times larger than
simple tariff and other reforms affecting goods. This is because telecommunications, finance, transport, and business
services have many links to the rest of the economy and raise the productivity of many sectors. Newfarmer warns, however
that "Countries have to learn the lessons of the East Asia crisis. Liberalization has to be accompanied by effective
bank supervision, competitive telecommunication regulation, and privatization that results in new competition if
countries are to benefit from globalization rather than being overrun by it."
Transport receives special attention in the report. If developed countries were to allow freer competition in
international shipping, costs to developing countries could be lowered by more than 20 percent, given that existing
private restrictions, some of which enjoy semi-official sanction, reduce competition and drive up prices.
On intellectual property, the authors recommend "rebalancing" the Uruguay Round Agreement on Trade-Related Intellectual
Property Rights (TRIPS) agreement - the global agreement that gave patent holders new trade rights - to allow developing
countries, especially low-income developing countries, access to drugs and products essential to development at
competitive prices. As it stands, if developing countries were to fully implement TRIPS, they would have to pay abroad
some $20 billion more in technology-related payments and foot the administrative bill for local enforcement. For these
reasons, the report advocates a phased implementation of TRIPS with donor-funded technical assistanc
e linked to level of development, and a more liberal use of compulsory licenses to stimulate competition in pricing.
Going beyond Qatar: Towards a new global trade architecture for development
The report argues for reshaping the global architecture of world trade to promote development and poverty reduction. The
authors focus on four policy areas:
Using the WTO ministerial to launch a "development round" of trade negotiations that would reduce global trade barriers,
especially to poor countries and to the products the poor produce.
Engaging in global collective action to promote trade outside the negotiating framework of the WTO.
Adopting pro-trade development policies of high-income countries unilaterally.
Enacting new trade reform in developing countries., particularly in the area of domestic policies that impact
Outside of the WTO, the Bank, together with other international financial institutions and agencies, can provide "aid
for trade" through stepped up development assistance in several areas. One way this is being done is through the
"Integrated Framework," or IF. Set up by bilateral donors, the IF provides trade-related technical assistance to LDCs.
Help can come in the form of policy advice that feeds into poverty reduction strategy papers (PRSPs) or 'integration
studies' that underpin country assistance strategies. In the final analysis, however, it is developing countries
themselves that have to undertake these reforms. The report notes that domestic reforms should not be held hostage to
actions abroad, and those countries that have accelerated integration into the global economy have experienced more
rapid growth than those that have not.
Also, multilateral assistance can be expanded to help overcome bottlenecks in countries that will improve
competitiveness - for example in finance, transportation infrastructure, education for low-income workers, and public
sector trade-related institutions. Another possibility involves funding mechanisms to help poor nations use intellectual
property protection to their benefit by protecting intangible assets such as traditional knowledge, designs, music and
ethno-botanicals. Finally, a global health fund could be set up to purchase licenses from developers of new medicines
essential to treating HIV/AIDS and other diseases that disproportionately afflict poor countries.
"As developing countries seek new opportunities for growth and poverty reduction, it is more vital than ever to expand
market access for their exports. The next set of multilateral trade negotiations must move development to center stage,
and must begin soon" concludes World Bank Chief Economist Nick Stern.
The report summary and related materials are available to the public at: