RR RUEHDBU RUEHPW RUEHSL
DE RUEHBUL #0388/01 0321509
ZNY SSSSS ZZH
R 011509Z FEB 10
FM AMEMBASSY KABUL
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 5283
RUEHNT/AMEMBASSY TASHKENT 0040
RUEHIL/AMEMBASSY ISLAMABAD 8357
RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING 5001
S E C R E T SECTION 01 OF 02 KABUL 000388
E.O. 12958: DECL: 01/26/2035
TAGS: ELTN EINV ECON PGOV AF IR
SUBJECT: Rail Projects Underway, But a Uniform Network Remains
Classified By: Ambassador E. Anthony Wayne for reasons 1.4 b and d.
1. (U) Summary: While two rail construction projects in Afghanistan are underway and several more are under discussion,
the dream of a nationwide rail network remains remote. Small-scale projects sponsored by neighboring countries require
different rail gauges, matching those of the countries these projects border; while the security situation is delaying
two projects and likely deterring proposals for more. The enforcement of a single rail gauge is not practical since it
would fail to make connections with at least half of Afghanistan´s neighbors. The Afghan Government must obtain funding
f´ and build gauge changing stations if it is serious about connecting Afghanistan´s major population centers and
industrial areas by train. End Summary.
Herat and Mazar: The Trains Have Left the Station
- - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - -
2. (S) The rail link from Herat to Torbat-E Heydarieh, Iran, funded by the Iranian Government, is more than half
complete. The section the Iranians are building and funding in Afghanistan is approximately 60 km from their border
eastward toward Herat. The Afghan government under the original bilateral agreement with Iran is obligated to fund
construction of the Afghan railroad´s second half, consisting of an additional 60 km of track onward to the western
suburbs of Herat city. Iran uses standard gauge (1435 millimeter) track within Iran and is likely to use track to this
specification within Afghanistan. (Note: standard gauge is the predominate gauge in the United States.)
3. (SBU) Afghan Government officials toured the Iranian-funded portion of the project January 16 and were reportedly
told by Iranian engineers that the rail bed was essentially completed and the rail laying could be completed in 60 days.
They also met Afghan owners of property along the first half of the portion of the railroad to be funded by the Afghan
government and informed them they would be compensated for the right of way within 20 to 30 days. The Afghan Ministry of
Finance has allotted 97 million Afghanis (a little less than $2 million) for this. Herat Governor Nuristani said the
Ministry of Finance has promised approximately $55 million for constructing the last stage of the railway, including
compensating landowners for right of way for the second half of Afghan portion. Under the terms of the agreement to
build the rail line, Afghanistan promised to fund construction of half of the project within its borders and Iran
committed to the other half within Afghanistan, as well as extending its own rail line to the border with Afghanistan.
4. (S) Extending from the Afghan/Uzbek border at Hairaton to Mazar-i-Sharif, an Asian Development Bank (ADB)-funded,
Uzbek Railways-constructed track will soon be under construction. The 75 kilometer rail line will cost approximately
$170 million. ADB awarded the contract in October 2009. Uzbek Government-owned Uzbek Rail agreed to begin construction
in December and finish by the end of 2010. However, security concerns have delayed Uzbek Rail´s construction
preparations, such as barracks for workers (all of whom will come from Uzbekistan). Uzbek Rail asked ISAF to provide
security forces for the site. ISAF was unable to do so but did agree to share actionable intelligence with Afghan
National Security Forces (ANSF) and assured the company that ANSF would provide security. According to a source in
Tashkent, Uzbek Rail deemed ANSF protection insufficient and entered contract talks with an American private security
contractor. The source also indicated Uzbek President Islom Karimov had ordered the company to start work immediately in
5. (U) The railroad will be 1520 millimeter gauge, the standard across the former Soviet Union. It will connect with
existing Uzbek tracks at Termez, Uzbekistan. This rail line is important to coalition forces in Afghanistan, who hope it
can speed up the delivery of crucial supplies through the Northern Distribution Network, routing shipments through the
former Soviet states to Afghanistan.
Pakistani and Chinese Projects Off the Rails
- - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - -
6. (C) When China Metalurgical Corporation (MCC) won the tender for Aynak copper mine in 2008, its bid included a
promise to build a rail line "associated with the project." The line would carry copper concentrate and eventually
smelted copper to more accessible locations for onward distribution. In January 2010, World-Bank-funded analysts and a
private MCC contractor told us the company currently considers the railway not feasible. During a meeting at the mine in
September 2009, MCC leadership mentioned what they viewed as "flexible" the requirement to put in the rail, which
then-Minister of Mines Adel roundly contradicted, saying the rail was required and "non-negotiable." A draft of the
contract obtained by the Embassy states that "MCC has made a commitment to the Government of Afghanistan to construct,
at MCC´s sole expense, a railway associated with the Project...the Parties acknowledge and agree thatthe failure to
conclude a railway agreement within this timeframe shall constitute cause for the Parties to revoke this Mining
Contract." In a recent Ambassadorial meeting, Minister of Mines Shahrani said the Aynak contract requires MCC to build
"two rail lines" one north and one east, a statement inconsistent with our unofficial copy of the contract. The Embassy
and World Bank analysts continue to encourage the Ministry to make the Aynak contract public for transparency reasons.
If this occurs, however, the fact that MCC has still not completed an addendum to the contract that would specify when
and where rail will be built may provoke controversy.
7. (U) Pakistani media reported January 17 that work on a Quetta-Kandahar rail line would begin soon. The track is
complete from Quetta to the Pakistani border at Weesh Chaman, however, the remaining seven kilometers of track to the
Afghan border post at Spin Boldak, as well as the remaining 111 kilometers to Kandahar, are "on hold" by the Afghan
Ministry of Public Works due to security concerns. Assuming Afghanistan and Pakistan do not build a facility to transfer
cargo or change gauges at the border, the rail gauge would be 1,676 millimeters, known as broad gauge, the standard
across the Asian sub-continent.
Hodgepodge Gauges: Problematic but Not the End of the Line
- - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
8. (U) With three different rail gauges potentially entering the country, freight will need to be offloaded at break of
gauge or facilities must be built to lift cars from the tracks and change their bogies (the chassis of a railway car.)
Changing the bogies on a 50-car train should take approximately five hours and could coincide with customs processing.
However, it will significantly delay future passenger and freight trains if the independent lines ever connect.
Dependent on donor funding for its rail development, Afghanistan is presently not in a position to enforce a single
national rail gauge and must plan to mitigate the economic impact of multiple gauges. The ADB and other independent
studies have recommended that Afghanistan adopt the Russian 1520 millimeter gauge within Afghanistan and install gauge
change stations at Herat and Kandahar City. (Note: Dual- or variable-gauge tracks avert the need for specialized
facilities but cost significantly more to build. To Post´s knowledge, no donor has expressed interest in funding this
additional cost. End note.)
9. (U) Rail traffic volumes are also an issue. The general rule of thumb is that a rail line is not economically viable
with less than 5 million tons of throughput. Anything less than this is more efficiently handled by trucks. The
anticipated volumes from and through Afghanistan to Iran fall far short of this.
10. (U) Comment: Many countries, including Australia, Tanzania and Angola, operate railroads of different gauges. These
gauge differences become significant, however, as the number of gauges proliferate within country. On the other hand,
even the most far-sighted donor would hesitate to build a link to Afghanistan requiring cargo to be offloaded at its
border or the construction of an expensive break of gauge facility. It is clearly in the interests of Afghanistan´s
neighbors to seek matching rail gauges within Afghanistan, and, unfortunately, Afghanistan is not in a position to adopt
a single common rail gauge that would isolate it from at least half of its neighbors. We are encouraging the Afghan
Government to plan wisely when evaluating future rail projects and consider the impact of volume and gauge changes on
rail efficiency and economy.
11. Embassy Tashkent has cleared this cable.