VZCZCXRO5689
RR RUEHAG RUEHROV RUEHSL RUEHSR
DE RUEHBS #0183/01 0481331
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
R 171331Z FEB 10
FM USEU BRUSSELS
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC
RUCPDOC/USDOC WASHDC
RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHDC
INFO RUCNMEM/EU MEMBER STATES COLLECTIVE
RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING
RUEHBR/AMEMBASSY BRASILIA
RUEHNE/AMEMBASSY NEW DELHI
RUEHSA/AMEMBASSY PRETORIA
RUEHGV/USMISSION USTR GENEVA
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 07 BRUSSELS 000183
SIPDIS
NSC FOR DNSA FROMAN, KVIEN, BELL
STATE PLEASE PASS TO USTR FOR SAPIRO AND WILSON
EO 12958 DECL: 02/16/2020
TAGS EAID, ECON, ECPS, EFIN, ENRG, EINV, ETRD, EUN, KGHG,
PREL, SENV, BR, CH, HA, IN, SF
SUBJECT: SUBJECT: DEPUTY NSA MICHAEL FROMAN VISIT TO
BRUSSELS, JANUARY 27, 2010
SUMMARY
-------
1. (C) Deputy National Security Advisor for International Economic Affairs Michael Froman held wide-ranging discussions
with over 25 senior EU officials in Brussels January 27. Froman and the Ambassador met with Commission President
Barroso, the incoming European Commissioners for Climate (Hedegaard), Internal Markets (Barnier) and Trade (De Gucht),
and with new European Council President Van Rompuy,s Chief of Staff. Froman and the Ambassador also lunched with a dozen
Directors General and Commissioner cabinet chiefs, and led a roundtable with Member State Ambassadors. The EU officials
welcomed Froman,s call for stronger bilateral cooperation to boost our economies, improve coordination on climate, Doha
and financial regulation, and push back against coordinated opposition of BASIC countries (China, India, Brazil, South
Africa) to our international positions. They also appreciated the Ambassador,s message that they must capitalize on the
Obama Administration commitment to multilateralism to secure with the U.S. concrete achievements to strengthen growth
and create jobs.
2. (C) DNSA Froman and Hedegaard committed to work closely to define the right Post-Copenhagen climate negotiating group
and process, and agreed to hold a DVC prior to the February 11 European Council. Froman and De Gucht committed to share
ideas to improve the Transatlantic Economic Council (TEC), with De Gucht planning a February-March DC visit to discuss
TEC and trade issues. Froman, Barnier, and lunch attendees agreed on the importance of bilateral coordination to improve
G20 and other work on financial reform. De Gucht and other officials noted the urgency of building U.S.-EU crisis
response and development cooperation in the wake of the Haiti earthquake. Finally, Froman expressed U.S. support for the
new EU Lisbon Treaty structure; the officials explained that the EU will need time to adjust to the new format but
should emerge with better, more streamlined decisionmaking. END SUMMARY.
A PACKED AGENDA WITH SENIOR EU OFFICIALS
----------------------------------------
3. (C) Deputy National Security Advisor for International Affairs Michael Froman held intense, broad-ranging discussions
with EU and Member State officials on January 27 enroute to the Davos World Economic Forum. Ambassador Kennard
accompanied Froman throughout the day. Froman met with European Commissioners-designate for Climate Connie Hedegaard and
for Internal Markets Michel Barnier, current Development Commissioner and Commissioner-designate for Trade Karel de
Gucht (plus staff for all), and new European Council President Herman Von Rompuy,s chief of staff Frans Van Daele.
Froman also met briefly with Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso and with Director General for External Relations
Joao Vale de Almeida. Froman attended a lunch hosted by Vale de Almeida featuring:
- Marco Buti, Director General for Economic and Financial Affairs Jonathan Faull, Director General for Justice, Freedom
and Security - Antonio Cabral, President Barroso Senior Economic Policy Adviser - Fernando Andresen Guimaraes, President
Barroso Diplomatic Adviser
- James Morrison, Head of Cabinet for High Representative and Commission Vice President Catherine Ashton - Olivier
Guersent, Head of Cabinet for Commissioner-designate for Internal Market and Services Michel Barnier - Timo Pesonen,
Head of Cabinet for Commissioner-designate for Economic and Financial Affairs Ollie Rehn - Mark Vanheukelen, Head of
Cabinet of Commissioner-designate for Trade Karel de Gucht - Alan Seatter, Director for North America in Directorate
General for External Relations - Jean Claude Thebault, new Commission Deputy Secretary General
BRUSSELS 00000183 002 OF 007
4. (C) Froman and the Ambassador ended with a roundtable including Member State Permanent Representation (COREPER II)
Ambassadors from: Austria (Hans Dietmar Schwiesgut); Belgium (Jean De Ruyt); Denmark (Poul Skytte Christoffersen);
France (Philippe Etienne); Italy (Fernando Nelli Feroci); Poland (Jan Tombinski); Sweden (Christian Danielsson); and the
UK (Kim Darroch).
5. (C) Discussions centered around six themes: the need to improve U.S.-EU bilateral coordination on a range of
transnational issues (including climate, Doha and financial reform), to avoid repeating what Froman termed of 2009 and to meet the rising challenge of surprisingly united BASIC countries (China, India, Brazil and South
Africa); close coordination on climate to build upon the fledgling Copenhagen Accord; better coordination on G20 and
financial supervisory and regulatory reform issues; our joint commitment to reach a Doha Development Agenda Agreement;
the need to improve the Transatlantic Economic Council (TEC) and use it to secure concrete achievements that boost
growth and create jobs; and improving U.S.-EU crisis response and development cooperation in the wake of the Haiti
earthquake.
IMPROVING U.S.-EU COOPERATION TO MEET THE
CHALLENGE
--------------------------------------------- --------------
6. (C) DNSA Froman made two major points to his interlocutors on bilateral relations. First, he stressed, 2009 was a
transition year for both the U.S. Administration and EU institutions, with both facing enormous challenges. Despite our
mutual good intentions in relaunching U.S.-EU relations, Froman said, and great improvement in tone, we continued to
talk past each other on some issues. He cited Copenhagen as an example, where both sides misread each other,s
negotiating bottom lines, and stressed that EU leaders, model of outdoing each other to push EU-wide policy did not/not work in dealing with the U.S. Administration.
7. (C) Second, Froman told the EU officials, it is remarkable how closely coordinated the group of countries (China, India, Brazil and South Africa) have become in international fora, taking turns to impede
U.S./EU initiatives and playing the U.S. and EU off against each other. BASIC countries have widely differing interests,
he said, but have subordinated these to their common short-term goals to block some Western initiatives. The U.S. and EU
need to learn from this coordination, Froman said, and work much more closely and effectively together ourselves, to
better handle third country obstructionism and avoid future trainwrecks on climate, Doha or financial regulatory reform.
8. (C) Ambassador Kennard underscored that this is a significant moment for U.S.-EU relations. There is important
alignment between our interests, he said, with President Obama as a committed multilateralist in the White House. We
must feel urgency to work together to deliver real benefits that will boost growth and create jobs, the Ambassador
stressed, given that we have a limited window of opportunity before a political referendum occurs on these efforts.
9. (C) The EU officials welcomed Froman,s and the Ambassador,s calls for closer cooperation. Director General for
External Relations Vale de Almeida emphasized that the Commission transition and Lisbon Treaty implementation, while
seeming to add to the complexity of EU institutions (for example, with greater power for European Parliament) will
produce a streamlined EU that is an indispensible U.S. partner. Commission President Barroso is committed to closer
relations, Vale de Almeida said, highlighting his shift of TEC leadership to the Trade Commissioner as a positive step.
Vale de Almeida asked for U.S. understanding in the EU attaching political importance to annual U.S.-EU Summits and
other these processes are the way the EU produces results, he declared. He acknowledged the U.S. desire for concrete outcomes
but stressed that symbolism is important to EU institutions.
BRUSSELS 00000183 003 OF 007
10. (C) Council President Van Rompuy Chief of Staff Van Daele elaborated on the theme that the Lisbon changes, in adding
a permanent EU Council President and Foreign Policy High Representative, will strengthen the EU,s capacity to be an
effective U.S. partner. Froman responded that the U.S. welcomes the Lisbon changes and wants to help Van Rompuy in his
new position. Van Daele welcomed this, saying he understood U.S. policy constraints on climate and financial regulation,
given Capitol Hill dynamics. We must work together on economic reform and must look forward together, he added; there is good from wagging fingers.8 The U.S. and EU must focus more on getting China more invested in global cooperation, he
concluded, to make the Chinese realize they ,t have their cake and eat it too.8
11. (C) Member State Permanent Representation Ambassadors appreciated the good will of Froman and the Administration to
work for better relations with Europe. UK Ambassador Darroch stressed that President Obama,s engagement with Europe (the
President has made six trips to Europe since his inauguration, Froman noted) is welcome, and that European leaders ,t sufficiently responded yet.8 The Ambassadors were skeptical that Lisbon would bring rapid benefits. They noted that
EU institutions will require an adjustment period to the new structure, implying delay in a fully effective EU under the
new treaty. Polish Ambassador Tombinski expected big institutional fight,8 but thought eventually Lisbon may speed up EU operations. French Ambassador Etienne said the
challenge will be to use these new capabilities effectively so the EU can act coherently with its major partners.
Ambassadors Danielsson of Sweden and Christofferson of Denmark agreed that the lesson of our mutual misunderstanding in
Copenhagen should be ensuring better communication to avoid a recurrence in other fora.
CLIMATE CHANGE: BUILDING UPON THE COPENHAGEN ACCORD
--------------------------------------------- ------
12. (C) Climate Commissioner-designate Hedegaard thanked Froman for President Obama,s efforts in Copenhagen. She asked
about U.S. legislative efforts on climate and U.S. political dynamics around mid-term Congressional elections and how
they might impact U.S. international cooperation moving toward COP-16 in Cancun, Mexico. Froman responded that the U.S.,
overriding international goal, to work on implementing the Copenhagen Accord as well as on the other UN tracks, will not
change. We will still work toward domestic legislation as well, Froman said. He thought midterm dynamics would not
strongly impact our work going into Cancun.
13. (C) Froman and Hedegaard reviewed Copenhagen outcomes. Froman said that while nobody considered the agreement
complete, it is a good step forward. Hedegaard said Copenhagen left some disappointed in the UN process, but stressed
that we can,t give up. The Accord contains a lot of good points, she said, that should not be wasted. She hoped that the
U.S. noted the EU was muting its criticism of the U.S., to be constructive.
14. (C) Both officials agreed we must focus now on operational steps to implement the Copenhagen Accord. Froman said the
U.S. will work in the next few weeks on getting countries to sign up for ( themselves with8) the Accord, and to inscribe their targets. The U.S. would be happy, he suggested, with the seven
emerging market countries in the Major Economies Forum (MEF), saying others would then follow. We also need to work on
financing, he added.
15. (C) Froman emphasized that we need to determine the right process and grouping of countries to go forward. This
could be the Greenland group of 28 countries from Copenhagen, MEF members, or countries signing the Accord, he
speculated. The U.S. is not wedded to a particular grouping, he said, but there seems to be broad consensus that relying
on the two UNFCCC working groups is insufficient. Hedegaard agreed, suggesting that an informal MEF grouping might be
effective. It would be critical that this have legitimacy, she said.
BRUSSELS 00000183 004 OF 007
The Greenland group is an option, she said, but others might resent this designation.
16. (C) It is vital to get G-77 agreement to whatever grouping we use, Hedegaard continued. Both agreed it will be
important to talk to incoming G-77 chair Yemen, with Froman adding it will also be important to be in close touch with
Mexico as COP-16 chair. In fact, Froman added, we need all major groups ) the EU, MEF, BASIC, G-77, the island countries
) to agree to a negotiating mechanism. Hedegaard responded that we will need to work around unhelpful countries such as
Venezuela or Bolivia. Froman agreed that we will need to neutralize, co-opt or marginalize these and others such as
Nicaragua, Cuba, Ecuador. Hedegaard noted the irony that the EU is a big donor to these countries, while Cuba, for
example, is actively discouraging others from signing on to the Accord.
17. (C) Both agreed that we need processes for coordination and avoiding recriminations. Hedegaard said the EU will use
the February 11 informal European Council meeting to reflect on how to be more focused and effective on climate. Froman
noted he will do likewise for the U.S. in meetings with Climate Special Envoy Todd Stern and other Administration
officials. He suggested that he and Hedegaard speak before the Council meeting to coordinate; she agreed to a
videoconference February 10, the day after the new Commission is expected to be formally approved by the European
Parliament.
18. (C) Froman and Hedegaard then discussed specific goals for the Bonn and Cancun meetings. Hedegaard said we must have
universal acknowledgment that world cannot afford8 failure to reach a binding agreement. Froman thought that we should try for progress by Cancun on
MRV (monitoring, reporting and verification), the adaptation framework, technologies, and some resolution of process.
Both agreed that we should also get countries to inscribe 2020 targets.
19. (C) Froman and Hedegaard also discussed their respective domestic policy developments, noting the complex issue of
carbon border taxes. This is an issue of great concern to China, Froman noted. Hedegaard noted the EU,s struggle with
how to manage inclusion of aviation and maritime sectors in the EU,s Emissions Trading Scheme. Both agreed it is vital
to show economic benefits and potential job creation from bilateral cooperation on climate and clean energy
technologies, to build public support for our efforts; Hedegaard committed to provide to Froman EU studies showing such
impacts.
20. (C) Froman summarized his climate points for the Member State Ambassadors; while some Post-Copenhagen soul searching
is warranted, he said, we need to focus on avoiding a damaging replay of our division there in the runup to Cancun. We
need to work to make the Copenhagen Accord real, getting all countries that matter to associate themselves with the
agreement and inscribing their targets. We need early U.S.-EU agreement on the right group and process to take
discussions forward, and need progress on financing, technical points and transparency and verification; all are
important, he concluded.
G20/REFORM OF FINANCIAL SUPERVISION AND REGULATION
--------------------------------------------- -----
21. (C) Froman heard at length from Internal Markets Commissioner-designate Barnier and several lunch participants on
the importance of coordination in the G20 and elsewhere on reform of financial supervision and regulation. Froman
stressed with all that the U.S. wants to work closely with the EU on all G20 issues, particularly on agreeing to common
principles. The G20 is an important framework for this cooperation, he said, and it is vital that we deliver results on
G20 commitments not just for their own sake but to build the credibility of the G20 framework. Froman said he wants to
ensure the G20 is effective.
BRUSSELS 00000183 005 OF 007
22. (C) Director General for Economic and Financial Affairs Buti agreed that the ascendency of the G20 has raised our
need for bilateral coordination. He lauded the new macroeconomic and financial dialogue with Treasury launched just days
ago, noting we have agreed to hold this to coordinate views before major events. Buti said 2009 was a year8 for the G20, and noted we are delivering on many of the major commitments, including IFI reform, resources and
quotas, the framework for balanced growth agreed in Pittsburgh, and sharing plans for withdrawal of stimulus when
appropriate. Froman responded that a major medium-term challenge should then be more structural reform; Buti agreed.
Vale de Almeida said the G20 is improving and streamlining as it develops, which is positive. He pointed to Buti and
others at the lunch as those who can deliver on EU commitments and cooperation in the G20.
23. (C) Barnier told Froman he wants to work closely and in confidence with the U.S. He wants to move as much as
possible in step with the U.S., he stressed. Barnier,s first non-EU trip will be to the U.S., he added, possibly for the
April G20/IMF Spring Meetings. Froman responded that Treasury had the primary role on financial services issues, but
that he looked forward to staying in touch. Before President Obama,s recent announcements on banking reform, Barnier
noted, there had been doubts in the EU on U.S. willingness to fulfill G20 commitments. There have been doubts about U.S.
willingness to implement Basel II bank capital rules, but said this is important to ensure a level playing field. Froman
again emphasized U.S. willingness to work with Europe on these issues.
24. (C) Barnier said he was impressed by President Obama,s announcements on bank size and scope. He noted EU reaction
has varied, with the UK against, the Dutch in favor and the French of the direction.8 David Wright, Director for DG Internal Market, said the announcements were a significant and
structural change from what had been under discussion in the international community. He emphasized that the EU normally
does not regulate via caps on particular business lines but through competition policy. Vale de Almeida in the lunch
also questioned whether the announcements were from the G20. Froman responded that these proposals were consistent with what had been raised previously, noted that we
were not alone in showing leadership on these issues, but returned to the U.S. commitment to cooperate toward agreement
on basic principles and avoid damaging regulatory arbitrage.
25. (C) Barnier said roadmap is the G20 roadmap,8 and he seeks
relevant, proportionate regulation in Europe that leaves no market or player unregulated. He said his immediate
priorities include resolving Council-Parliament differences over EU financial supervisory architecture, OTC derivatives
(and cooperation here with the U.S.), corporate governance, and improving crisis prevention and management tools.
WORKING TOWARD A DOHA DEAL
--------------------------
26. (C) Froman emphasized to Commissioner De Gucht and other EU officials the U.S. commitment to try to complete an
ambitious Doha Development Agenda agreement, but said that public spats over negotiations were damaging; we should work
to prevent this going forward. Froman described our Doha position, and our bilateral engagement with India, Brazil,
China and others to produce market access. He emphasized the vital importance of this market access to our stakeholders
and the Congress. Froman said that the current offer is not acceptable to U.S. agriculture, NAMA or services
stakeholders. De Gucht responded that it is important to close the Doha Round, and that blaming others does not get us
there; the question is how to manage the process with appropriate ambition. He said that the EU can live with the result
on the table, but if other things come onto the table, we will need a equilibrium.8 De Gucht said he hoped that the U.S. bilateral efforts would not interfere with the ability to nail down
existing tariffs (Comment: this probably
BRUSSELS 00000183 006 OF 007
refers to proposed bound tariff reductions in recent DDA texts, which reduce maximum permitted ) bound ) tariffs but do
not reduce currently applied tariffs significantly. End comment).
27. (C) De Gucht added that he faces a similar challenge, because the Spanish Presidency is pushing for bilateral FTAs
with Latin America, and he wants to ensure such efforts do not interfere with the DDA. Froman responded that eliminating between bound and actual tariffs is insufficient, that there has to be additional market access. Froman emphasized the
importance of the U.S. and EU sending a consistent message on this issue to third countries, even though he recognized
that our positions, though similar, are not identical. He encouraged open dialogue and transparency with the EU. Froman
said he did not want there to be misunderstanding among our trading partners (similar to what happened in Copenhagen)
that the U.S. would ultimately agree to what is on the table.
MAKING THE TRANSATLANTIC ECONOMIC COUNCIL DELIVER
--------------------------------------------- ----
28. (C) Froman emphasized to all of his interlocutors the Administration,s interest in making the TEC deliver real
results. We are open to all ideas, he said; we can reform, restructure or even eliminate the TEC, based on what we
identify together as the best way to secure concrete achievements. The Ambassador added that the bottom line should be
generating growth and creating jobs, which could help us prioritize issues for the TEC agenda.
29. (C) De Gucht welcomed Froman,s interest in the TEC. He viewed the TEC as very important, particularly in the context
of the rising Chinese economy and significant trade deficits of both the U.S. and EU with China. De Gucht noted that as
U.S.-EU tariffs have fallen, non-tariff barriers (NTBs) are the logical next challenge. De Gucht Chief of Staff
VanHeukelen stressed that U.S.-EU economic links are to overestimate,8 with bilateral FDI. De Gucht highlighted a recent study showing that if we could remove one half of existing bilateral NTBs,
the EU and U.S. would get many billions of dollars in welfare gains (GDP increases) by 2016, or greater than Doha.
Seatter of DG External Relations pointed to the 12-14 million jobs dependent on transatlantic trade, stressing that
steps to expand these jobs could be an important near-term TEC achievement. VanHeukelen said that to date the TEC has
not been seen as extremely effective, but it is important that it do better.
30. (C) Both the EU and U.S. need more growth, De Gucht said, in the face of such challenges as rising social security
and health care costs. De Gucht recognized, however, that there are political problems with addressing some NTBs. He
agreed it is important that the next TEC meeting produces concrete results, and should not be a simple get-acquainted
session. Therefore, he added, we must prepare carefully, out of the spotlight. He said Spain is pushing for a TEC before
its Presidency ends June 30, but noted it is unclear if this would provide adequate preparation time. He said a
low-profile planning meeting might be more appropriate in the near term. He added he is preparing a paper on TEC goals
to send to the U.S. in the next few weeks and hoped the U.S. could do the same. De Gucht said he hopes to visit
Washington in late February to discuss key TEC and trade issues with Froman and others. (Note: his staff clarified that
the trip will likely be in early March. End note).
31. (C) Both agreed that possible TEC topics could include Doha, climate, China/third country issues, and financial
regulation. Froman agreed that there should be no deadlines8 for the TEC, and that the important thing is to ensure the next meeting produces significant results, to
justify the presence of high-ranking officials and respond to stakeholders. We are flexible on timing, and can take five
to nine months to achieve concrete results, he underscored. Froman committed to producing a U.S. paper to discuss with
the EU.
BRUSSELS 00000183 007 OF 007
IMPROVING CRISIS RESPONSE AND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION AFTER HAITI
--------------------------------------------- ---------------
32. (SBU) Commissioner De Gucht offered Froman his views on the situation in Haiti, where De Gucht visited the previous
week in his capacity as current Development Commissioner. He said that what had happened was a disaster, guessing that least 250,0008 were killed, with &20 percent8 of Port-au-Prince destroyed. He thought the Haiti situation manageable, however, with time and money needed
for recovery. The Southeast Asian tsunami had been much worse, he noted. A lot of assistance food stocks were already in
Haiti when the earthquake hit, he said, and water and food distribution was OK. Roads were mostly unaffected, he added.
The biggest near-term problem, De Gucht explained, will be for 250,000 homeless when the rainy season begins in six
weeks. The GOH and donors need to rapidly build camps, he said, to avoid pandemics once rains start. Overall, in De
Gucht,s view, life in Haiti is up8 again, and despite media reports, security problems are not serious.
33. (SBU) Morrison of Ashton,s cabinet noted our bilateral cooperation on Haiti, and stressed that the EU is committed long-term to rebuilding the Haitian economy and
state. High Representative Ashton seeks greater development cooperation with the U.S., he said. Seatter of DG External
Relations said that the challenges we have faced and met in Haiti coordination underscore our need to work on our crisis
response and overall development coordination. This is an area where we can achieve strong results this year, Seatter
added.
34. (U) This cable has been cleared by Deputy National Security Advisor Michael Froman.
MURRAY
End Cable Text
Zenaida X Toledo 07/30/2008 04:04:14 PM From DB/Inbox: TRANS
.