VZCZCXRO1120
OO RUEHGH
DE RUEHUL #1507/01 2650747
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
O 220747Z SEP 09
FM AMEMBASSY SEOUL
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 5710
RUCPDOC/USDOC WASHDC 9185
RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHINGTON DC
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHINGTON DC//DDI/OEA//
RHHMUNA/USCINCPAC HONOLULU HI//FPA//
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHINGTON DC
RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHINGTON DC
RUEKDIA/DIA WASHINGTON DC//DB-Z//
RUEHMO/AMEMBASSY MOSCOW 0315
RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING 6671
RUEHKO/AMEMBASSY TOKYO 6742
RUEHGH/AMCONSUL SHANGHAI 1293
RUEHSH/AMCONSUL SHENYANG 5065
RUEHIN/AIT TAIPEI 4025
RUEHGP/AMEMBASSY SINGAPORE 7239
RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK 1542
RUEHGV/USMISSION GENEVA 2854
RUEHLO/AMEMBASSY LONDON 1932
RUEHFR/AMEMBASSY PARIS 2540
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 07 SEOUL 001507
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PREL PGOV MARR ECON KPAO KS US
SUBJECT: SEOUL - PRESS BULLETIN; September 22, 2009
TOP HEADLINES
-------------
Chosun Ilbo, JoongAng Ilbo, Hankook Ilbo,
Seoul Shinmun, All TVs
President Lee Proposes "Grand Bargain"
on N. Korea's Nuclear Issue
Dong-a Ilbo, Hankyoreh Shinmun
Prime Minister Nominee Remains Steadfast in Calling for Change to
New Administrative Capital Relocation
Project of Sejong City
Segye Ilbo
Prime Minister Nominee: "(Relocating Administrative Offices to)
Sejong City Is Inefficient from a National Perspective"
DOMESTIC DEVELOPMENTS
---------------------
President Lee Myung-bak, in a Sept. 21 meeting jointly hosted by the
Korea Society, the Asia Society and the U.S. Council on Foreign
Relations in New York, proposed a "grand bargain" for the Six-Party
Talks in which North Korea will dismantle the core parts of its
nuclear program in exchange for security assurances and
international economic aid. (All)
President Lee was further quoted as stressing qualitative changes in
the ROK-U.S. alliance, saying: "It is time for the ROK-U.S. alliance
to contribute to world peace." (Chosun)
The Justice Ministry said yesterday that it will submit an
immigration bill next month to the National Assembly to collect
biological records, including fingerprints, from foreigners entering
the ROK. (JoongAng)
INTERNATIONAL NEWS
-----------------
CIA Director Leon Panetta, in a recent interview with Bloomberg,
said that the U.S. and North Korea "are discussing the ability to
try to talk with one another" and that the two countries "are in a
honeymoon situation right now." (JoongAng)
There is a growing consensus within the Obama Administration that
China has played a major role in changing North Korea and that the
Administration should strengthen cooperation with China until the
North's nuclear dismantlement. (JoongAng)
According to Radio Free Asia (RFA), U.S. political circles are
raising the possibility of a summit meeting between the U.S. and
North Korea in the first half of next year. (Hankook, Segye, Seoul)
MEDIA ANALYSIS
---------------
-N. Korea
-----------
Most media gave top front-page play to President Lee Myung-bak's
Sept. 21 proposal in New York for a "grand bargain" on North Korea's
nuclear issue. President Lee was widely quoted: "We need an
integrated approach to fundamentally resolve the North Korean
nuclear issue. Through the Six-Party Talks, we need to push forward
a 'grand bargain' to dismantle the core parts of the North's nuclear
program, while at the same time providing security assurances and
international economic aid."
In a related development, a key Blue House official was quoted as
explaining: "While the previous, step-by-step package deal only
SEOUL 00001507 002 OF 007
wasted time because everything went back to square one when the
North decided to leave the talks, President Lee's 'grand bargain' is
a 'one-shot deal' focused on giving North Korea (everything) that it
wants (economic aid and regime security) while, at the same time,
receiving everything that we want from North Korea (North Korea
denuclearization.) "
Conservative Chosun Ilbo observed that it was the first time
President Lee used the term "grand bargain" in an international
forum and that he apparently meant to provide momentum to dialogue
between the four big powers surrounding the Korean Peninsula. In an
editorial, Chosun argued: "The idea of resolving the North Korean
nuclear issue through a package deal is nothing new. ... . In order
to avoid repeating past failures (in negotiations with North Korea)
the ROK and the U.S. should provide substantial aid only if there is
proof that North Korea has dismantled its nuclear program in an
irreversible fashion."
Right-of-center JoongAng Ilbo commented in an editorial: "This
'grand bargain' proposal is a timely concept, which we expect to
serve as a turning point in fundamentally resolving the North Korean
nuclear issue. ... First of all, the ROK should come up with the
specifics of an 'integrated approach' to make the "grand bargain"
feasible. It is also important to closely cooperate with China,
Russia and Japan as well as with the U.S. Afterwards, the ROK
should present the grand bargain during talks with North Korea,
whether they are bilateral or multilateral talks."
Conservative Dong-a Ilbo editorialized: "The North will be deluding
itself if it thinks that it can use bilateral dialogue with the U.S.
or the Six-Party Talks to buy time. There will not be endless
opportunities for North Korea to resolve the nuclear issue
peacefully while receiving comprehensive economic aid. If the North
misses this opportunity, it will inevitably face stronger
international sanctions and will not be able to win a security
guarantee for the Kim Jong-il regime. Only when the North shows
(its strong commitment toward) nuclear dismantlement through action
can it escape international isolation and economic difficulties."
Right-of-center JoongAng Ilbo carried an inside-page report entitled
"U.S. Sees that China has Changed N. Korea... (The U.S.) Is Likely
to Strengthen Cooperation with China on N. Korea." The report
quoted President Barack Obama as telling CNN on Sept. 20 that
Washington's North Korea policy has been a success so far and that
he's satisfied with the cooperation from China and Russia in
sanctioning North Korea for its nuclear and missile tests.
-Afghanistan
-------------
Most newspapers carried inside-page reports on a recent 66-page
report by General McChrystal, the U.S. and NATO commander in
Afghanistan, in which he warned that more troops are needed in the
war-torn country within the next year or the nearly 8-year-old war
"will likely result in failure."
Conservative Chosun Ilbo wrote in the headline: "Gen. McChrystal:
'Without More Troops U.S. Risks Failure in Afghan War;' Obama
Lackadaisical in Sending More troops without a Clearer Strategy."
OPINIONS/EDITORIALS
--------------------
N. KOREA'S LAST OPPORTUNITY TO ABANDON NUCLEAR WEAPONS AND RECEIVE
"GRAND BARGAIN"
(Dong-a Ilbo, September 22, 2009, Page 35; Excerpts)
President Lee Myung-bak's "grand bargain" proposal can be described
as a "bundle of presents" for North Korea to persuade it to abandon
its nuclear programs. During the ROK-U.S. summit in Washington this
past June, President Lee had proposed a "comprehensive package,"
which was different from the previous negotiation framework of
phased compensations. The comprehensive package was designed to
SEOUL 00001507 003 OF 007
address North Korea's denuclearization steps and the rewards that it
will receive in return at one stroke. While the "comprehensive
package" was about resolving the nuclear issue and providing
economic assistance, the "grand bargain" goes further to include a
security assurance for the North and international economic aid.
Although the North is recently continuing its charm offensive by
signaling its willingness to accept not only bilateral dialogue with
the U.S. but also multilateral talks, the international community is
responding with skepticism, seeing North Korea's recent moves as a
"repeat of its past tactic to escape difficulty by getting (the
international community) to ease its sanctions." The world's trust
in North Korea is almost at rock bottom. So far, North Korea has
gained what it wanted by cycling through a pattern of provocation,
negotiation and deal-breaking with other countries. The
international community is now trying to avoid being deceived by
this tactic again.
The North will be deluding itself if it thinks that it can use
bilateral dialogue with the U.S. or the Six-Party Talks to buy time.
There will not be endless opportunities for North Korea to resolve
the nuclear issue peacefully while receiving comprehensive economic
aid. If the North misses this opportunity, it will inevitably face
stronger international sanctions and will not be able to win a
security guarantee for the Kim Jong-il regime. Only when the North
shows (its strong commitment toward) nuclear dismantlement through
action can it escape international isolation and economic
difficulties.
ROK, U.S. SHOULD WORK OUT WAYS TO AVOID REPEATING PAST FAILURES IN
NEGOTIATIONS WITH N. KOREA
(Chosun Ilbo, September 22, 2009, Page 39)
In a speech in New York on Monday, President Lee Myung-bak said,
"Now is the time to seek a grand bargain or package settlement.
Through the Six-Party Talks, North Korea should first dismantle the
key elements of its nuclear program and then we will provide
security guarantees and international assistance," Lee said. He
called for the Five Parties (U.S., China, Japan, Russia and the ROK)
to develop a comprehensive approach to address the North Korea
nuclear issue.
Previously, U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said Washington
was willing to offer North Korea "military and political guarantees"
and economic incentives if it agrees to dismantle its nuclear
program. The comments indicate that South Korea and the United
States have agreed to offer security guarantees and economic support
in exchange for nuclear dismantlement.
The idea of resolving the North Korean nuclear issue through a
package deal is nothing new. In October 1994, a year after the
first North Korean nuclear crisis flared up, tensions were reduced
by the Geneva accords, in which the North was promised a light-water
reactor as well as food and heavy oil shipments if it froze the
Yonbyon nuclear facility. But this lowered tensions only
temporarily, while the source of the problem remained, only to
resurface again later. North Korea's overtures since July to seek
talks with South Korea and the U.S., may well be based on the
judgment that it can carry on with the same strategy while holding
on to its nuclear weapons program.
South Korea cannot sit by and watch while North Korea proposes talks
and the U.S. responds to the offer. In order to avoid repeating
past failures (in negotiations with North Korea,) the ROK and the
U.S. should provide substantial aid only if there is proof that
North Korea has dismantled its nuclear program in an irreversible
fashion. What are the chances of North Korea scrapping its nuclear
weapons program as a result of negotiations? The government must
have no illusions and take a cold, hard look at the reality of the
situation.
(This is a translation provided by the newspaper, and it is
identical to the Korean version.)
SEOUL 00001507 004 OF 007
PRESIDENT LEE'S 'GRAND BARGAIN' PROPOSAL REVEALS DISCREPANCIES IN
HIS "POLICY OF DENUCLEARIZATION AND OPENNESS"
(Hankyoreh Shinmun, September 22, 2009, Page 31)
During his visit to the U.S., President Lee Myung-bak proposed a
package agreement on the North Korean nuclear issue. The concept of
nuclear diplomacy that he proposed appears to signal the beginnings
of a move towards dialogue in order to resolve the nuclear issue.
How effective this proposal will be is in doubt, however, as it does
not show any real understanding of the problems of the existing
North Korea policy.
The core of President Lee's proposal is a package agreement in which
North Korea is asked to abandon core parts of its nuclear program
through the Six-Party Talks in exchange for a definite security
guarantee and an earnest commitment on international assistance.
This proposal represents both a substantial advance after North
Korea's initial steps towards total denuclearization, and also
declares an intention to provide more incentives. One can glimpse
signs that there has been some consideration prior to the start of
nuclear discussions on how to present a specific proposal. It also
conveys the sense of encouraging the U.S. not to accede too easily
in its upcoming dialogue with North Korea.
The current proposal remains in line with President Lee's Vision
3000: Denuclearization and Openness Plan, in which large-scale
assistance is promised to North Korea on the condition that it first
abandons its nuclear program. The proposal therefore inherits all
of that policy's problem areas, which have already been revealed all
too clearly. First and foremost, the section on "abandoning core
parts of the North Korean nuclear program" is something that can
only be accomplished after considerable progress is made in
negotiations, yet there is nothing about the process leading up to
it. In this regard, this proposal can be seen as a retreat when
compared to President Lee's Independence Day celebratory address,
where he said, "If North Korea makes the determination to abandon
its nuclear program, I will push forward with a new vision of
peace." Realistically, the U.S. and North Korea are the ones
leading nuclear discussions. It will be impossible to gain the
cooperation of the countries involved if the South Korean government
merely calls for prior denuclearization without securing any
leverage for negotiations. It is also inappropriate for it to be
seen continuing to fixate on five-party discussions, a transformed
version of the five-party talks framework.
Another major problem with the proposal is how it conveys the sense
that inter-Korean relations are subordinate to the nuclear issue.
President Lee said, "Even if we cooperate with and hold dialogue
with North Korea in the future, resolution on the nuclear issue will
serve as one of the main items on the agenda." It is in itself
contradictory to declare an intention to discuss the nuclear issue
with North Korea without making any basic efforts to thaw
inter-Korean relations by resuming tourism efforts at Mt. Kumkang
and Kaesong or by providing humanitarian assistance. Such an
approach will prevent the formation of the "virtuous circle of
inter-Korean relations and resolution to the nuclear issue" that the
government has been emphasizing.
The problem with a policy of demanding prior denuclearization is not
that apparent in a situation where pressure is being applied on
North Korea, but it can easily turn into a hindrance to
negotiations. Unless the South Korean government is more assertive
in its interactions with the other countries involved, including
North Korea and China, by changing its "denuclearization and
openness" policy and making headway in inter-Korean relations,
packet agreement plans like the current one will remain
unrealistic.
(This is a translation provided by the newspaper, and it is
identical to the Korean version.)
SEOUL 00001507 005 OF 007
WELCOMING PRESIDENT LEE'S 'GRAND BARGAIN' ON N. KOREA'S NUCLEAR
ISSUE
(JoongAng Ilbo, September 22, 2009, page 46)
President Lee Myung-bak, who is on a visit to New York, proposed a
"grand bargain" resolution of North Korean nuclear issue. In a
September 21 speech jointly sponsored by (the Korea Society, the
Asia Society) and the U.S. Council on Foreign Relations, President
Lee proposed a comprehensive deal in which North Korea dismantles
the core parts of its nuclear program in exchange for security
assurances and international economic aid. This 'grand bargain'
proposal is a timely concept, which we expect to serve as a turning
point in fundamentally resolving the North Korean nuclear issue.
As President Lee said, in the last 20 years, the North's nuclear
issues have repeated (a pattern of) dialogue and tension, progress
and setbacks, as well as stalemates. We should break the past
pattern, in which we rewarded North Korea for its agreement on a
nuclear freeze, but the North broke its promise and everything went
back to square one. U.S. President Barack Obama pledged not to
engage in step-by-step negotiations because he is well aware that
the U.S. has been deceived by North Korea's "salami tactics," in
which Pyongyang slices the process of nuclear abandonment as thinly
as possible and then requires rewards after each sliced step in
order to maximize its gains.
Only one solution will work. The ROK should enter into a "one-shot
deal" for the most fundamental and core parts. For their part,
North Korea, which proclaimed that it developed its nuclear program
due to the U.S.'s antagonistic policy, would gain security
assurances and economic aid, while the other Six-Party countries
pursue North Korea's complete nuclear dismantlement. President Lee
explained this idea to President Obama during the June ROK-U.S.
summit and raised the need to hold consultations involving the five
countries (of the Six Party Talks) excluding North Korea. President
Lee believed that the five countries need to specifically discuss
action plans to get North Korea to give up its nuclear ambition.
There is no other alternative to fundamentally resolve the North
Korean nuclear issue.
There will be a bumpy road ahead for the "grand bargain." North
Korea's nuclear dismantlement means dismantling existing nuclear
weapons and materials in a verifiable way and dismantling all
nuclear facilities including uranium enrichment facilities in an
irreversible way. This (grand bargain) will merely end up being an
empty vision, without Kim Jong-il's determination. Kim Jong-il
should consider the best way for North Korea to obtain a security
guarantee and face the realities of (North Korea's situation) since
he is wrestling with a succession issue due to his ill health. The
North cannot achieve its goal of becoming prosperous and powerful if
it insists on being recognized as a nuclear state. North Korea will
not have any future if it misses this opportunity. As President Lee
said, no countries in the world will antagonize North Korea if it
pledges to discard its nuclear weapons program and come forward to
join with the international community.
First of all, the ROK should come up with the specifics of an
'integrated approach' to make the "grand bargain" feasible. It is
also important to closely cooperate with China, Russia and Japan as
well as with the U.S. Afterwards, the ROK should present the
grand bargain during talks with North Korea, whether they are
bilateral or multilateral talks. If this is the only, even if not
easy, way to settle the North Korean nuclear issue, we should take
active action to deliver on this vision.
FEATURES
--------
PRESIDENT PROPOSES 'GRAND BARGAIN' TO DEAL WITH NORTH
(JoongAng Daily, September 22, 2009, Front Page)
By Ser Myo-ja
SEOUL 00001507 006 OF 007
Lee says past incremental attempts were easy to sidestep
President Lee Myung-bak proposed yesterday a "grand bargain" for the
Six-Party Talks in which North Korea will swap dismantlement of core
parts of its nuclear arms program in exchange for security
assurances and international economic aid.
As a part of his trip to the United States this week, President Lee
is scheduled to attend a luncheon jointly hosted by the U.S. Council
on Foreign Relations, the Korea Society and the Asia Society on
Monday, New York time. In a speech prepared for the event, Lee said
it is time to break the pattern of the past in which North Korea was
rewarded for bad behavior. To put an end to the nuclear crisis on
the Korean Peninsula, Lee said a grand bargain must be pushed
forward by Seoul, Washington, Beijing, Tokyo and Moscow.
The Korean-language text of Lee's address was made available in
advance of his actual speech.
Lee's remarks were also to be made at a sensitive time. According
to the Blue House, Lee will hold separate bilateral meetings with
Chinese President Hu Jintao and Japanese Prime Minister Yukio
Hatoyama on Wednesday. The proposal of a grand bargain also came
days after North Korean leader Kim Jong-il expressed his willingness
to discuss his country's nuclear arms programs in both bilateral and
multilateral talks.
"In order to unite the two Koreas, we must first achieve
denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula," Lee said according to the
text. "To this end, the North must give up its nuclear arms
programs."
The South Korean president, however, said no signs have appeared
that Pyongyang is willing to do so.
"Until now, the North's nuclear issues have repeated (a pattern of)
dialogue and tension, progress and setbacks, as well as stalemates,"
Lee said. "We must break this pattern from the past. Leaving aside
the fundamental issue of North Korea's complete nuclear
dismantlement, we had compromised and rewarded the North for a
nuclear freeze. The North, then, broke its promise and the
situation went back to square one. We must no longer repeat the
precedents of the past 20 years."
Lee said Seoul, Washington, Tokyo, Beijing and Moscow need
five-nation consultations in order to clearly agree on the final
route of Pyongyang's nuclear abandonment and create an action plan
to achieve the goal. The South Korean president said he had already
made such a proposal to his U.S. counterpart, Barack Obama, when
they met in Washington for a bilateral summit in June.
"We need an integrated approach to fundamentally resolve the North
Korea nuclear issue," Lee said. "Through the Six-Party Talks, we
need to push forward a 'grand bargain' to dismantle the core parts
of the North's nuclear program, while at the same time providing
security assurances and international economic aid."
A senior Blue House official explained that Lee's proposal seeks to
seal an overall deal because past approaches have proven
inefficient. "While the previous, step--by-step package deal only
wasted time because everything went back to square one when the
North decided to leave the talks," the presidential aide said, "Lee
is proposing that negotiations from now on must focus on
irreversible nuclear dismantlement. Immediately after the deal is
concluded, the North and the five parties must act simultaneously."
The official also said the previous plan of a "comprehensive package
deal" was more focused on what to give to the North, while Lee's
proposal of a "grand bargain" is based on a concept of reciprocity.
"The grand bargain is about giving North Korea (everything) that it
wants (economic aid and regime security) while, at the same time,
receiving everything that we want from North Korea (North Korea
denuclearization.)
SEOUL 00001507 007 OF 007
Another senior official said that Lee is considering substantive
measures on dismantling core parts of the North's nuclear programs.
"Moving used nuclear fuel rods, which are the sources of
weapons-grade plutonium, outside North Korea under the monitoring of
the International Atomic Energy Agency, or destroying core parts of
the nuclear reactor are possible methods of dismantlement," he said.
"Of course, all nuclear materials and nuclear weapons that have
already been built must be dismantled."
"Five countries of the Six-Party Talks (with the exception of the
North) have reached a consensus on the overall deal, and we are
currently discussing the specifics of the negotiations with the
North," he added.
Reiterating his August promise for economic aid to the North in
return for its decision to give up nuclear arms, Lee said North
Korea must not feel such a process is a threat to its regime.
"By giving up nuclear programs, the North will be able to form new
relationships with the United States and the international
community, and that will be the only path for the North's survival
and development," he said.
In asking China to play a larger role in persuading the North, Lee
said that South Korea will also increase its efforts, noting that
the nuclear issue will always be addressed at all inter-Korean
talks. Lee said Washington and Seoul will act in unison to deal
with the matter, while South Korea will continue to implement UN
sanctions on the North to punish its nuclear development and
proliferation attempts.
"This is not a crisis, but an opportunity for North Korea," Lee
said. "North Korea must not let this opportunity - perhaps its last
- to slip away." By making public his proposal of the "grand
bargain," Lee appears to be bidding farewell to existing strategies
of resolving the nuclear crisis step by step. Until now, North
Korea has repeated brinkmanship and "salami tactics," in which
Pyongyang slices the process of nuclear abandonment as thinly as
possible and then requires rewards after each sliced step in order
to maximize its gains while delaying the end result.
"The 1994 Geneva Agreement between the United States and the North
for a nuclear freeze has already been broken, and enormous expenses
were wasted for the light-water reactor construction and supply of
heavy fuels," a senior Blue House official said. "The September 19,
2005 agreement of the Six-Party Talks also envisioned a step-by-step
approach, but it has also proven ineffective because the North still
conducted a nuclear test. "While past negotiations dealt with the
easiest and lightest issues first, President Lee is proposing to
settle everything at once," the official said.
The latest proposal will also change Lee's North Korea policy. Lee
had promised assistance to boost the North's per capita income to
$3,000 over the next decade in return for the North's decision to
give up its nuclear programs. In the new proposal, dismantlement is
no longer a precondition, but a card Pyongyang can trade for
economic aid and security.
STEPHENS