INDEPENDENT NEWS

Cablegate: Costa Rica: Possible Pathways to Regional Energy

Published: Fri 25 Sep 2009 08:08 PM
VZCZCXYZ0009
RR RUEHWEB
DE RUEHSJ #0823/01 2682006
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 252006Z SEP 09
FM AMEMBASSY SAN JOSE
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 1244
INFO RUEHZA/WHA CENTRAL AMERICAN COLLECTIVE
RHMCSUU/DEPT OF ENERGY WASHINGTON DC
UNCLAS SAN JOSE 000823
SIPDIS
DEPT FOR WHA/CEN, WHA/EPSC:MROONEY, SGARRO AND FCORNEILLE,
EEB/TTP/BT:RMANOGUE, EEB/ESC/IEC/EPC
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ECON ENRG EINV PGOV PREL CS
SUBJECT: COSTA RICA: POSSIBLE PATHWAYS TO REGIONAL ENERGY
PROSPERITY
1. SUMMARY. In their September 16-17 trip to Costa Rica, the
Pathways to Prosperity team of WHA/EPSC Director Matt Rooney,
WHA/EPSC Trade Officer Susan Garro and EEB/TPP/BT Director Robert
Manogue met with three energy-sector leaders: Pedro Pablo Quiros,
executive President of the Costa Rican Institute of Electricity
(ICE); Mario Alvarado, executive director of the private energy
producers' association ACOPE; and Julio Matamorros, Vice Minister of
the Ministry of Energy, Environment and Telecommunications (MINAET).
All three experts discussed the Central American Power
Interconnection Program (SIEPAC, reportedly operational within 18
months) and the future of the electricity market in Costa Rica. Key
concerns included the reliability of SIEPAC generated supply, Costa
Rican development of excess capacity, and energy reform. Julio
Matamorros also spoke of successive measures that Costa Rica will be
taking in coming years to convert the transport sector from
hydrocarbon fuels to electricity and hydrogen. Costa Rica has
admirable vision for its domestic energy future; U.S. diplomacy can
help them be similarly visionary about the potential regional
market. End summary.
----------------------
MANAGING SIEPAC SUPPLY
----------------------
2. ACOPE's Mario Alvarado emphasized private industry's desire to
join ICE as party to SIEPAC and enter into long-term cross-border
supply contracts. ICE's Quiros' view seemed to center on SIEPAC as
a mechanism available to the grid operator (ICE) to facilitate
exports of excess Costa Rican electrical power. Quiros, focused on
instability among Costa Rica's northern neighbors, clearly did not
feel that regional power market integration could contribute to
Costa Rican security in any other way. He did acknowledge the
interest of a proposed sea link from Panama to Colombia (and hence
to Venezuela and Ecuador). Alvarado's take on SIEPAC was less
focused on the instability of Costa Rica's northern neighbors; he
emphasized that a strong regional regulator would have to be in
place to ensure that national regulators have the power and the will
to force generators under their jurisdiction to honor cross-border
contracts, even when prices are rising in their national market. In
this regard, Alvarado referred to an incident in 2007 when Panama's
energy regulator exacerbated a Costa Rican power shortage by
prohibiting export of energy to Costa Rica, despite a signed
contract, because Panama was short on electricity.
-------------------------
WHO BENEFITS FROM SIEPAC?
-------------------------
3. Vice Minister Matamorros commented that the Costa Rican consumer
needs to benefit from SIEPAC, with the clear implication that the
system needs to be managed properly in order for this to be the
case. COMMENT: We note that Laura Chinchilla, front-runner in Costa
Rica's upcoming presidential elections, wrote an opinion piece on
September 19, 2009 in which she advocated the construction of excess
hydroelectric capacity and export of that energy until such time as
drought-reduced supply meets national demand. This appears
consistent with Quiros' and Matamorros' vision of SIEPAC's role. End
Comment.
---------------------------------------------
REFORM IS DESIRED BUT WHEN IS THE RIGHT TIME?
---------------------------------------------
4. In reference to a recently introduced Energy Bill designed to
begin the unbundling of the Costa Rican power sector and increase
the role of private electricity generators in the market, Quiros
stated that he isn't opposed to a more liberal model of energy
generation but doesn't believe that the timing is right for reform
in Costa Rica. He cited the fact that this is an election year and
that the ICE unions are already upset with the Telecom market reform
established by CAFTA-DR. Matamorros, who has been the principal
official advocate of this legislation, also acknowledged that the
proposal will not be addressed until the next administration. Both
Quiros and Matamorros emphasized the importance of fomenting local
research and development in the energy sector. Furthermore, they
emphasized the attractiveness of cooperation with U.S. research and
development entities through mechanisms such as the Energy and
Climate Partnership of the Americas, noting that Costa Rica had
written to the U.S. Department of Energy in support of a proposal
for a regional energy efficiency center made by the Natural
Resources Defense Council. The proposed center, to be located in
San Jose, would build on the Central American experience with
electricity market integration and promote broader knowledge of best
practices in efficiency and reliability of grid management.
-------
COMMENT
-------
5. These conversations show the core challenge of successful
completion of the SIEPAC process: SIEPAC can only succeed if the
Central Americans come to see the market as a truly integrated
regional whole. A regional market that each party sees as a dumping
ground for cheap excess power will not result in renewable energy
investment which is needed to secure the economic and climate
benefits that are possible. U.S. diplomacy under the banner of ECPA
can help the parties achieve more.
BRENNAN
View as: DESKTOP | MOBILE © Scoop Media