VZCZCXRO6169
OO RUEHCHI RUEHFK RUEHHM RUEHKSO RUEHNAG RUEHPB
DE RUEHML #1674/01 1960930
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
O 140930Z JUL 08
FM AMEMBASSY MANILA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 1284
INFO RHEBAAA/USDOE WASHDC IMMEDIATE
RUCPDOC/USDOC WASHDC IMMEDIATE
RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHDC IMMEDIATE
RUEHZU/ASIAN PACIFIC ECONOMIC COOPERATION IMMEDIATE
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 MANILA 001674
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
STATE FOR EB/IFD/OIA, EB/ESC AND EAP/PMBS
STATE PASS USAID FOR AA/ANE, AA/G
STATE PASS EXIM, OPIC AND USTR
USAID FOR AA/ANE AND AA/EGAT
DOE FOR TOM CUTLER
TREASURY FOR LMOGHTADER
TREASURY ALSO FOR OASIA
USDOC FOR 4430 ITA/MAC/ASIA & PAC/KOREA & SE ASIA/ASEAN
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ENRG EFIN EXIM RP
SUBJECT: AES' Philippine Investment: Buyer's Remorse? (CORRECTED
COPY)
REF: MANILA 01417
1. (U) This is the corrected copy with the addition of paragraph
7.
2. (SBU) Summary: Officials of U.S. energy giant AES alleged in a
meeting with Embassy officers on July 1 that the Philippine
state-owned National Power Corporation was abusing its market power,
and the Energy Regulatory Commission was violating its own
guidelines in order to lower the wholesale price of electricity.
AES became the largest U.S. investor in the Philippine energy sector
in April 2008 when it finalized the purchase of a 660-megawatt
coal-fired plant in Masinloc, Zambales Province for $930 million.
The company now finds that artificially depressed electricity rates
and increasing fuel costs have eliminated profit margins. AES
warned of a chilling effect on energy-sector investments that will
create eventual electricity shortages. End summary.
3. (SBU) The AES executives said they had been induced to purchase
the Masinloc power plant by government assurances that
power-generating assets were being privatized and that the Energy
Regulatory Commission would follow and enforce rules that tie prices
to the cost of supplies. According to AES executives, the
government now subsidizes the government-owned power corporation and
brings rates down to a level below even the variable costs of power
generation, making it impossible for AES and other independent power
producers to recover their fixed costs and make debt repayments.
The executives informed Embassy officers of the difficulties their
company faced and solicited practical approaches for dealing with
the sensitive financial and political ramifications of this problem.
4. (SBU) The AES executives pointed out that coal prices had
increased from $67 per metric ton in July 2007, the month of their
successful bid, to $170 per metric ton in July 2008. Government
regulations state that the recovery period (i.e., the lag in
adjusting wholesale prices to reflect changes in the cost of inputs)
for utilities shall not exceed six months, but in practice, there
were much longer delays. The AES executives claimed that the
extended recovery period amounted to a huge subsidy for the cost of
electricity, and noted that the National Power Corporation has not
filed for increased cost recovery since July 2006, which
artificially depresses prices.
5. (SBU) The AES executives said like most of the existing power
producers, they strongly support retail competition and open access,
as espoused by the Electric Power Industry Reform Act, but the cost
of electricity must reflect the true price and allow for better
price signals to influence electricity consumption. Only then, they
maintained, would private power generators be able to compete on a
level playing field, paving pave the way for open access. ("Open
access" would allow consumers drawing more than one megawatt of
energy to contract directly with power generation companies. The
legal trigger to allow open access is privatization of 70% of
National Power Corporation generation assets. Currently, about 48%
of National Power Corporation assets have been privatized through
the Power Sector Assets and Liabilities Management Corporation or
PSALM.)
6. (SBU) The AES executives warned that the current situation would
strongly discourage any additional investment in power generation
and that the stage was being set for serious power shortages within
the next three to five years, a situation similar to the crisis that
gripped the country back in the 1990s.
7. (SBU) Embassy Officers agreed that this was a very sensitive
issue in the current environment and advised AES to exercise caution
in how they raised the issue with the Philippine government and
public. High electricity costs have been headline news for several
months, making it difficult for any producer or distributor to
increase prices, and unlikely that AES could find a champion in the
Philippine Congress to promote their cause.
8. (SBU) Comment: AES paid $930 million for this coal-fired plant,
a record sale price for any Philippine government-owned asset. With
the current electricity market dynamics it is hard to imagine that
AES will recover its investment any time soon.
MANILA 00001674 002 OF 002
Kenney