INDEPENDENT NEWS

Cablegate: Un Ddr Program Cites Possible Obstacles

Published: Wed 16 Jul 2008 12:05 PM
VZCZCXRO9165
PP RUEHROV
DE RUEHKH #1071/01 1981205
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 161205Z JUL 08 ZDK DUE TO GARBLING IN ORIGINAL
FM AMEMBASSY KHARTOUM
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 1354
INFO RUCNIAD/IGAD COLLECTIVE
RHMFISS/CJTF HOA
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 KHARTOUM 001071
DEPT FOR AF/SPG, S/CRS, AF SE WILLIAMSON
ADDIS ABABA FOR USAU
DEPT PLS PASS USAID FOR AFR/SUDAN
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PGOV PREL KPKO SOCI AU UNSC SU
SUBJECT: UN DDR PROGRAM CITES POSSIBLE OBSTACLES
REFERENCE: (A) KHARTOUM 987
(B) KHARTOUM 927
(C) KHARTOUM 517
(D) KHARTOUM 506
KHARTOUM 00001071 001.2 OF 002
1. (SBU) Program Manager of the UN Integrated Disarmament,
Demobilization and Reintegration (IDDR) program Basil Massey told
poloff on July 9 that signing of the June 25 UN-GOS IDDR agreement
in Geneva (ref A) capped a six-month long effort to move the DDR
program forward. Massey said that at the June 25 signing the GOS
had urged IDDR to start both disarmament and demobilization efforts
in August, but IDDR refused saying the UN needs both time and
funding to establish the logistics-intensive $430-million four-year
program. In the South, Arop Moyak, the Chairman of the Southern
Sudan Demobilization, Disarmament and Reintegration Commission
(SSDDRC), reports that there is no agreement with the UN on the
amount of funding required for the program, particularly for the
Reintegration phase of DDR in Southern Sudan. Due to a severe lack
of employment opportunities and an under-developed infrastructure in
the South, the ability of the local economy to absorb demobilized
soldiers is almost nil, and the SSDDRC refuse to demobilize men who
have little prospect of earning a livelihood. The potential for
unrest and social upheaval, they feel, is too great to risk.
2. (SBU) Massey said that with the Geneva UN-GOS IDDR agreement in
hand, the UN will begin to establish three field offices in north
and south Sudan and in Darfur, begin to hire and train staff and
start an IDDR program public awareness campaign. He said that
increasing public awareness, particularly with government officials
and rebel groups, is critical to avoid false expectations of what an
IDDR program can provide.
3. (SBU) Massey said AEC Chairman Derek Plumbly believed the signing
of the UN-GOS IDDR Geneva agreement represented substantial progress
on the CPA. He added that the UN Secretary General will also
highlight this progress in his periodic report to the UN Security
Council. Massey said that IDDR momentum will continue with a
technical donor meeting in Khartoum in July, an Ambassadorial-level
national DDR council meeting in mid-August, and a mid-August DDR
roundtable conference in Juba where any donor or implementing
partner can raise its concerns.
4. (SBU) Asked about potential obstacles to IDDR success, Massey
said that financial problems will be the greatest obstacle that IDDR
needs to be overcome. He said that no donors have come forward to
pledge the $385 million needed for the four-year IDDR program, and
that at least $195 million needs to be pledged before the
demobilization phase can start. He added that IDDR needs the
demobilization funding to be in place by October 2008 in order to
start the program by April 2009. He said that the GONU has already
told him that the GOS is ready to live up to its $45 million
contribution, but is skeptical that the IC will donate its $385
million share.
5. (SBU) In contrast to this, SSDDRC Commissioner Moyak reports that
DDR in the South alone will require in excess of $500 million to
accomplish, and that there will be no DDR in Southern Sudan at all
until there are sufficient funds to establish what he views as a
realistic Reintegration program. "The demobilization and
disarmament is the easy part," he said. "The hard part is
Reintegration, and no DD will start until we know we have sufficient
R." He said Reintegration is far more difficult and expensive to
accomplish in the South because the Southern economy offers few job
opportunities. "Everything here is more expensive due to the lack
of infrastructure." He estimates it will cost between $3000 to
$5000 per individual to create a realistic Reintegration program,
which is the cost of providing the social and economic
infrastructure needed to properly support a demobilized soldier.
Currently, only $1750 per person is available. Demobilized
soldiers, he said, need some kind of medical support, the promise of
education for their children, and the realistic opportunity to find
productive work.
6. (SBU) Moyak's concerns were two fold. First, without adequate
Reintegration support, ex-soldiers will have little choice but to
turn to crime or rebellion against the government. "What they know
is the gun, and they will return to the gun if that is their only
option to survive. This could dramatically destabilize the South."
Second, "If war returns, no one will fight if they see that the
veterans have been treated badly." The South, he said, simply will
not implement a DDR program that risked these outcomes.
7. (SBU) Comment: The difference in perspective between Massey and
Moyak on where DDR stands speaks volumes about how out of touch the
UN DDR office in Khartoum is with Southern views on what is
currently possible. Moyak's assertion that it will take between
$3,000 to $5,000 per individual to establish a realistic
KHARTOUM 00001071 002.2 OF 002
reintegration program is, of course, astronomical. However, what
the SSDDRC Chairman is really asking for is enough money to develop
a comprehensive economic and social development plan for Southern
Sudan, which is an unrealistic objective of a DDR operation, and is
completely beyond what his Commission could realistically manage.
That takes nothing away from his point, however, that the South is
currently poorly positioned to demobilize troops who have little
chance of finding work, and who will likely then become a major
destabilizing force in the South. At least in the South, an
effective DDR operation will need to find a way to plug into and
coordinate with donor funded economic development schemes to make
this process feasible, if and when southern leaders commit to a
broad disarmament program (until now there have only been efforts at
civilian disarmament). The reality of DDR programs, which both
Massey and Moyak did not acknowledge, is that three years into the
CPA neither the South nor the North have made a commitment to move
beyond a war footing and want to remain prepared in case hostilities
resume.
FERNANDEZ
View as: DESKTOP | MOBILE © Scoop Media