INDEPENDENT NEWS

Cablegate: Lebanon: Media Reaction, February 29, 2008

Published: Fri 29 Feb 2008 11:52 AM
VZCZCXRO1223
OO RUEHROV
DE RUEHLB #0314 0601152
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
O 291152Z FEB 08
FM AMEMBASSY BEIRUT
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 1153
RHEHNSC/WHITE HOUSE WASHDC IMMEDIATE
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC IMMEDIATE
RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHDC IMMEDIATE
INFO RUEHFR/AMEMBASSY PARIS PRIORITY 3153
RUEHLO/AMEMBASSY LONDON PRIORITY 2500
RUEHAK/AMEMBASSY ANKARA PRIORITY 3721
RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK PRIORITY 2007
RUEHXK/ARAB ISRAELI COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
RHMFISS/CDR USCENTCOM MACDILL AFB FL//CCPA PRIORITY
UNCLAS BEIRUT 000314
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
STATE FOR NEA/ELA - SOMERSET, NEA/PPD, R, INR/R/MR
INR-PARENT
SECDEF FOR OASD/PA
LONDON/POL
PARIS/POL
WHITE HOUSE FOR NSC
USCENTCOM FOR CCPA
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: KMDR OPRC KPAO PREF PREL KISL KPAL LE
SUBJECT: Lebanon: Media Reaction, February 29, 2008
Atmospherics:
------------
Most media outlets, even pro-March 14 outlets, seemed to believe
that moving the U.S.S. Cole nearer to the Lebanese Coast will only
add to the already complicated situation inside Lebanon. They noted
that, contrary to a number of statements by U.S. officials, that the
presence of the U.S.S. Cole is in fact a political message of
regional dimensions. Most media outlets went into detail about when
and how the U.S.S. Cole was dispatched, reminding their audience
that this is the third time in the last 50 years that the United
Sates has moved its navy ships nearer to the Lebanese coast.
Pro-March 8 outlets were aggressive in their comments about what
they believe the goals of having the U.S.S. Cole moved to the coast
were. They claimed that the U.S. wants to escalate the intensity of
its strong and hot messages to Syria, to terrorize Hizballah and
Syria's allies in Lebanon, and to encourage Israel to commit
additional massacres in Gaza.
News about the U.S.S. Cole did not prevent several media outlets
from highlighting the "continuous Israeli massacres" in Gaza "which
did not even spare nursing babies." Most media outlets carried a
moving photographof a young Palestinian father carrying his dead
baby in his arms, oblivious of people surrounding him and looking at
his son with infinite sadness. Some Lebanese media outlets
criticized Arab leaders' silence over the massacres, particularly
Saudi King Abdullah and Egyptian President Mubarak "who did not bat
an eyelash."
Selected Headlines:
------------------
"An American Navy Missile Destroyer Along the Lebanese Coast;
Washington Justifies This Step By 'Protecting Regional Stability'"
Moderate, anti-Syrian An-Nahar
"U.S. Destroyer Cole in Lebanese Waters To Terrorize The Resistance,
Syria, and the Summit! Washington Transcends the Presidential Game
To Direct Military Threat" Arab nationalist As-Safir
"America Repeats its 1982 Adventure" Pro-opposition Al-Akhbar
"Washington Moves An American Destroyer Towards the Lebanese Coast"
Centrist Al-Anwar
"US.S. Cole in Lebanon and Aoun is Not Concerned" Independent
Al-Balad
Block Quotes:
------------
"In Order to Protect Gaza from the Blood Bath," an editorial by
Aouni Al-Ka'ki in pro-Hariri Ash-Sharq (2/29):
"24 martyrs in 24 hours. The injured Gaza is about to drown in a
sea of blood and is living under fire. What is more dangerous from
Israeli aggression is the division among the Palestinians which
allowed Israel to launch such a bloody attack against the
Palestinian people. ...This Palestinian blood should unite the
Palestinian people because they cannot confront Israel without
unity..."
Sison
View as: DESKTOP | MOBILE © Scoop Media