This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS HARARE 002210
SIPDIS
USAID/W FOR DCHA/OFDA FOR HAJJAR, HALMREST-SANCHEZ
BRYAN, KHANDAGLE AND MARX
DCHA/FFP FOR LANDIS, BRAUSE, SKORIC AND PETERSEN
AFR/SA FOR POE AND COPSON
AFR/SD FOR ISALROW AND WHELAN
STATE FOR AF/S DELISI AND RAYNOR
NAIROBI FOR DCHA/OFDA/ARO FOR RILEY, MYER AND SMITH,
REDSO/ESA/FFP FOR SENYKOFF
GENEVA PLEASE PASS TO UNOCHA, IFRC
PRETORIA FOR USAID/DCHA/FFP FOR DISKIN AND FAS HELM
ROME PLEASE PASS TO FODAG
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: EAID PREL US ZI
SUBJECT: ZIMBABWE FOOD SWAP AGREEMENT SIGNED
REF: Memorandum of Understanding between
Government of Zimbabwe Ministry of Public Service,
Labour and Social Welfare and Grain Marketing Board
with United Nations - World Food Programme executed
on 16 September 2002 (copy faxed 9/29/02)
1. This is to confirm that the ref. Memorandum of
Understanding (MOU) for the long-planned swap of
17,500 Metric Tons (MT) of U.S.-source whole kernel
corn/maize donated to the World Food Program's Emergency
Operation (EMOP) appeal for Zimbabwe with an equivalent
amount of corn/maize from Government of Zimbabwe (GOZ)
stocks was finally signed by all concerned parties on
27 September 2002. [Note: The final document indicates
that the GOZ's Ministry of Public Service, Labour and
Social Welfare signed the MOU on 18 September 2002,
confirming that the Ministry of Lands, Agriculture and
Rural Resettlement's parastatal Grain Marketing Board
was, indeed, the long-standing obstacle to completing
this agreement. End Note.] WFP sources indicate that
the wheels are already in motion to implement this
agreement in a timely manner; however, it is still
expected that it will take at least several weeks to
complete.
2. Comment: The Mission views this as a most welcome,
albeit late, development in addressing the issue
surrounding U.S. biotech-derived food aid for Zimbabwe.
If completed successfully, without major mishap, it
should help considerably to alleviate fears, build
mutual confidence and overcome future country (and
even greater regional) reticence on this issue.
However, the Mission cautions that as a one-off
deal, this arrangement does not represent a long-term
solution to this issue. Continuing concerns regarding
the GOZ's ability to maintain adequate maize stocks
suggest that other/additional measures will be required
to effect a more lasting solution to this issue in
Zimbabwe. End Comment. Sullivan