INDEPENDENT NEWS

Attitudes to GE food under scrutiny - HortResearch

Published: Tue 21 Dec 1999 12:32 AM
It would seem the New Zealanders are still making up their minds about the benefits or otherwise of genetic technology, especially with regard to food. The unknown short-and long-term risks of genetic technology on health and the environment were among concerns expressed in the preliminary results of a three-year long study into the public's perceptions of genetically modified (GM) food.
The sudy, designed to measure and understand consumer attitudes towards GM foods, was undertaken by HortResearch in collaboration with AgResearch, Forest Research Institute, Auckland University and Massey University.
A perceived lack of choice and control over consumption of GM food due to the lack of labelling regulations and the resulting perception of being `part of an experiment' without having given consent was another concern .
Over half of the 908 New Zealanders aged 14 to 65, surveyed indicated some negativity towards GM foods. A quarter were extremely negative. Women were more likely to feel this way than men, as were people aged between 35-44 and over 65.
In comparison, only 10-18 percent felt positive about the technology and were more likely to be men aged between 18-24. A third were undecided.
However, the picture changed when people were presented with an image of a tomato genetically modified to reduce the need for pesticides. About 40 percent said they would probably avoid the tomatoes, and 25 of these said they would definitely avoid them. However, between 20-25 percent said they probably would buy the tomatoes. Again, a third said they were undecided. No gender differences were apparent, but rural respondents were more likely to avoid the product.
The researchers said there had been debate about how informing and educating the public will affect attitudes towards GM technology. Results show that knowledge plays some role in determining the belief that gene technology can provide benefits, although other factors such as concern for the environment are more influential. Indications are that people are still their time to consider the risks and benefits.
It will be another six months before the final analysis of this information will be completed giving a greater understanding of New Zealanders' attitudes towards genetic engineering.
ends

Next in Business, Science, and Tech

Government moves to protect elite soils
By: New Zealand Government
Calls for overhaul of gene-technology regulations
By: Royal Society Te Aparangi
Card spending dips in July
By: BusinessDesk
Govt takes more action to reduce waste
By: New Zealand Government
Fonterra Provides Update on Earnings
By: Fonterra
Potatoes vs people: govt moves to protect top vege-growing
By: BusinessDesk
New Zealand First Backs Plans to Protect Productive Land
By: New Zealand First Party
LGNZ cautious as government pits potatoes against houses
By: Local Government NZ
HortNZ welcomes safeguarding of country’s best growing soils
By: Horticulture NZ
Anti-housing rules to keep Kiwis locked out
By: New Zealand Taxpayers' Union
Productive farming land dug up for housing
By: RNZ
Gene editing regulations – Expert Reaction
By: Science Media Centre
Government responds to report on gene editing
By: New Zealand Government
Government can’t continue to ignore biotech
By: New Zealand National Party
Genetic Regulation Overhaul Overdue
By: New Zealand Life Sciences Network
View as: DESKTOP | MOBILEWe're in BETA! Send Feedback © Scoop Media