Food Watchdog Praised for Withdrawing Contaminated Rice (GE Free NZ press release)
New Zealander's 'food watchdog' - The NZFSA- deserves praise for pulling GE-contaminated rice off the shelves. But it
needs to do much more to encourage compliance amongst companies who ignore the problems of GE-contamination in certian
countries when sourcing their ingredients.
GE Free (NZ) would like to congratulate the NZ Food Safety Authority for their action to test and subsequently pull from
sale rice contaminated with the unapproved GE rice Bt63.
New Zealand's food watchdog took action after overseas Food Safety Agencies found a comprehensive range of rice products
from whole rice to rice flour noodles, rice paper, and pasta had been contaminated with the unapproved strain of GE Bt63
rice coming from China in March 2008.
"Bt is a insecticidal toxin and has known deleterious effects on the blood and organs," said Claire Bleakley of GE Free
NZ in food and environment.
"This rice has not been approved in the EU, Australasia or even in China where it came from".
This incident adds to concerns that the integrity and safety of the whole global food supply is threatened by GE mix-ups
in the lab, in distribution of seeds, through field-contamination of crops, and in post-harvest production.
Liability for resulting harm is a major isssue in New Zealand and overseas as the insurance industry have refused cover
leaving the public and taxpayers exposed to harm and left paying for the clean up. Innocent farmers and manufacturers
are also threatened and are already suffering.
In 2003 the NZFSA asked the Commerce Commission to investigate a New Zealand company for labelling a product GE Free
when it was then found to contain trace amounts of GE in its soy ingredients. The business was nearly bankrupted but at
the same time other businesses that had products containing up to 60% GE and which were not labelled escaped with a
reprimand and 'asked to comply' with the law in future.
This double-standard reveals a bias in application of the regulations and the need to genuinely hold to account those
responsible, including companies who claim patent-ownership of the genes that have illegally contaminated other foods.
"The importer must be held accountable and dealt with by the Commerce Commission. Identity preservation procedures would
have shown that this rice contained an illegal contaminant. To encourage compliance it is not enough to just ask them to
remove the dangerous product off the shelves," she said.
"It is very concerning that the NZFSA deals with companies pursuing a GE-Free policy in the harshest terms, and quite
differently to the light-handed response to companies deliberately using GE ingredients or which make no effort to
ensure their ingredients are not GE-contaminated. For consistency and accountability all breaches must be dealt with
equal rigour by the Commerce Commission".
"With the advent of the China Free trade deal the NZFSA will have to be highly vigilant in monitoring imports of foods
for unapproved contaminants" said Claire Bleakley."But the fear is they will just turn a blind eye except in the case of
major contamintaion identified by other authorities overseas. This is because they see promotion of trade as more
important, and would prefer not to have to do anything unless overseas markets demand action."
"The government also needs to take action to support the integrity of the food system. It must ensure that Country of
Origin labelling is implemented to stop the export and re-packaging of foods in other countries. But if the regulations
are breached they must treat all businesses with the same stick, not let the poluter off-lightly while throwing
consumer-oriented GE-free producers against the wall."
ENDS