INDEPENDENT NEWS

NIWA scientists have become propagandists

Published: Thu 29 May 2008 04:57 PM
29 May 2008
NIWA scientists have become political propagandists
The State Services Commission should investigate whether scientists of NIWA have crossed the boundary into politics with their sudden flurry of advocacy for action on so-called global warming at a time when the Government is struggling to gain support in Parliament for its Emissions Trading Scheme Bill. This today from the chairman of the New Zealand Climate Science Coalition, Rear Admiral Jack Welch.
“This flurry of advocacy has all the hallmarks of political spin, which has appalled the scientists associated with our coalition. Worse, NIWA is breaching the principles of good science by not qualifying its climate predictions with appropriate disclaimers.
“The claim by Dr Wratt that ‘the evidence of climate change continues to mount, climate models are becoming more sophisticated, and scientific knowledge of the climate is improving all the time ‘ rings hollow in the face of the disclaimer in the Third Assessment Report (Section 14.2.2.2.)of the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC): ‘In climate research and modelling, we should recognise that we are dealing with a coupled non-linear chaotic system, and therefore that the long-term prediction of future climate states is not possible.’
Admiral Welch continued: “Projections of future climate are not predictions, but speculation. They come from global climate models that have not been verified, so their output is merely conjecture.
“This is recognised across the Tasman, where the Australian CSIRO attaches a disclaimer to all its reports, such as this one on a report from the Queensland Government: ‘This report relates to climate change scenarios based on computer modelling. Models involve simplifications of the real physical processes that are not fully understood. Accordingly, no responsibility will be accepted by CSIRO or the Queensland Government for the accuracy of forecasts or predictions inferred from this report or for any person’s interpretations, deductions, conclusions or actions in reliance in this report.’
“NIWA are misleading New Zealanders on climate change issues by issuing projections of future climate without such a disclaimer,” said Admiral Welch.
“NIWA says they have taken the best models from the IPCC and has downscaled them so they can predict New Zealand's climate far into the future.
When challenged about their failure as weather forecasters they acknowledge they cannot predict the weather accurately but they can say that ‘December will be warmer than June.’ But, their large scale models all failed to predict the lack of global warming over the last ten years (which is like missing the fact that December is normally warmer than June down here.) so why should we trust these ‘downscaled’ versions of the same model. Downscaling does not correct fundamental failures of the parent model. If they cannot get the big picture right they cannot possible get the small scale right.
“If NIWA do insist they can forecast climate accurately we should get them to make firm forecasts of climate (not weather) out for 1,2,3,4,5 years into the future and check them for accuracy at the end of each year. Their future funding should then depend on the accuracy of their forecasts.
Admiral Welch said New Zealand has shown no clear sign of warming for the past 50 years, and in Christchurch it is a 100 years. "Rising concentrations of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere appear to be having little effect globally or locally. Data is available to show this. What has suddenly changed NIWA´s
minds? Is it because the Government needs help in order to pass the Emissions Trading Bill? And is it appropriate for scientists to suddenly become involved in what is political propaganda?
"It is vital that we have some urgent clarification of these issues before the lights go out throughout New Zealand. Here we have the extraordinary situation of our country, relatively one of the richest in terms of energy resources, with at least 2000 years of coal available to generate electricity, and we are denied the advantage of this resource because of a hypothesis carbon dioxide will dangerously heat the planet. This deception has gone on long enough. It´s time for New Zealanders to demand scientific fact, not more NIWA computerised fiction," said Admiral Welch.
ENDS

Next in Business, Science, and Tech

Tiwai Deal Gives Time For Managed Transition
By: New Zealand Government
Reserve Bank Responding To Illegal Breach Of Data System
By: The Reserve Bank of New Zealand
New Zealanders Have Their Hopes Up For 2021
By: Horizon Research Limited
Data Use Soars Over New Year’s Eve As Kiwis Stay Connected Digitally
By: Vodafone NZ
Lack Of Competitive Pressure Leads To An Undesirable Trading Situation
By: Electricity Authority
SEEK NZ Employment Report - Strong Job Ad Performance In Quarter Four, Job Ads Up 19% On Quarter Three
By: SEEK
2020: New Zealand’s 7th-warmest Year On Record
By: NIWA
Property Market Set To Cool From Sizzling To Warm In 2021
By: Quotable Value New Zealand
PriceSpy Research Reveals How Shopping Behaviours Have Changed This Christmas
By: PriceSpy
Noel Leeming Group Warned For Making Delivery Representations Without Reasonable Grounds During COVID-19 Lockdown
By: Commerce Commission
Gordon Campbell On The Excessive Secrecy Surrounding Cyber Hacks, And Some Lost Soul Legends
By: Gordon Campbell
Reserve Bank cyber attack: Third party involved can provide clues on info exposed - expert
By: RNZ
Digital Christmas: Online Traffic Spikes As Kiwis Connect With Friends And Whānau Online
By: Vodafone
Greens: Electricity Market Reforms Needed
By: Green Party
Calls For Tough Penalty For Meridian After Watchdog Finding
By: Flick Electric
View as: DESKTOP | MOBILE © Scoop Media