Hold GM Company liable for contamination costs
The biotechnology company, holding the gene patent for BT11 corn, need to be held liable and pay for the costs of the
most recent contamination caused by their product.
Sunshine Coast- the company who have inadvertently sold GE corn to Japan, must not be used as a scapegoat by the biotech
industry and left to carry the costs, and nor should the New Zealand public.
" We need strict liability laws which allow authorities to go back to the source of the problem - that is companies who
have won regulatory approval and are promoting the environmental release of their patented products which then
contaminate other non-GM products," says Jon Carapiet from GE Free NZ in food and environment.
The New Zealand government should also require seed-importers to find an alternative source of seed for crops such as
maize, which have undergone commercialised genetic engineering in the country-of-origin, and are more likely to be
contaminated.
"It is a threat to our national bio-security to continue to import seed from countries where widespread contamination is
most likely. We reject the Minister of the Environment's claims that there are no alternatives: we suggest she has never
asked her officials to find them. That is something the government must now do," says Mr Carapiet.
The importation of certain kinds of seed leaves farmers in a bind if they want to grow GE Free products as they are
dependent on MAF to test and approve incoming seed consignments.
MAF however cannot guarantee 100% GE Free product, but an obvious precautionary step is to not buy seed from countries
were regulation is already known to have failed.
The biotech industry has got away with contamination of food supplies particularly maize for too long, most notably the
contamination of corn in Mexico: its centre-of-origin.
"The only way to stop the insidious progress of GM constructs into our food supply is to hold the companies concerned
liable" says Jon Carapiet. "If a company patents a gene it must also accept responsibility for it when it causes harm or
contaminates another crop".
It is inappropriate that the NZ public will have to fork out for MAF services, the destruction of GE contaminated crop
and any mitigation required. Genetic tags identifying companies producing these unwanted products should be introduced
to allow them to be prosecuted for contaminating crops.
Some provision for these companies to be charged for contaminating our crops and soil should be inserted into the New
Organisms and Other Matters Bill now before the Select Committee.
Urgent explanation is also needed from MAF / ERMA about why they are considering pollen-drift as a cause of
contamination. What field-trials have taken place that would cause such contamination, and why were controls not in
place to prevent it?
It is of great concern that so little is understood about the mechanisms of GE crops, once they are in the environment
that there is no understanding of whether the gene constructs may have infected the ground and ensuing crops, or via use
as feed - animals entering the food supply.
The research the government has initiated must be completed and independently reviewed before the moratorium is lifted.