INDEPENDENT NEWS

Which of Labour’s trade policies will the PM pursue

Published: Sun 15 Apr 2018 06:28 PM
Which of Labour’s trade policies will the PM pursue in Europe?
‘As the Prime Minister heads to Europe, with the proposed trade deals with the European Union and Britain at the top of her agenda, which of Labour’s trade policies she is going to pursue?’, asks Auckland University law professor Jane Kelsey.
‘Is it the kind of traditional trade and investment deal that Labour and New Zealand First have criticised, then signed up to with the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement and in revisions of the China and Singapore FTAs?’
‘Or will it be the new “inclusive and progressive” strategy that Trade Minister David Parker is about to launch consultations on, but which does not yet exist?’
Professor Kelsey is herself in Europe and has been discussing the proposed negotiations with politicians, officials and activists in Britain and the European Union.
Both Britain and the EU see a deal with New Zealand as relatively easy and hope to fast track it. Informal talks began some time ago under National government, presumably following the TPPA-style model that the government says it wants to change.
‘A quick outcome assumes there is common ground on most issues, which in turn implies a traditional-style free trade and investment deal, not the significant rethink the trade minister has promised. If so, the minister’s consultation process would be sunk before it even starts.’
Professor Kelsey notes that the EU is expected to finalise its mandate for negotiations around 22 May and publish it immediately. The New Zealand government will face pressure to do the same.
‘There could be common ground with New Zealand over investment’, Kelsey said. The EU will want to run the trade and investment negotiations in parallel, with separate agreements, because of a split responsibility between the EU and Member states.
It is likely to promote a two-tier standing investment court in place of the current ad hoc system of investment tribunals to hear disputes, as it did with Canada. A decision on the constitutionality of that is due next year.
‘The problem for our government is the EU’s investment court system is old wine in new bottles: investors take disputes against states in offshore tribunals to enforce rule that are biased in favour of foreign investors and constrain government’s regulatory sovereignty’.
‘That’s not what the government promised New Zealanders, but have yet to deliver. A positive step to build confidence would be for our government to draw a red line in its negotiating mandate that says no investment agreement at all. That would give the Minister some credibility to begin negotiating a genuinely new trade platform’.

Next in New Zealand politics

600 new prison beds not enough, Corrections officers say
By: Public Service Association
Visit reinforces strength of New Zealand-Japan relationship
By: New Zealand Government
Angry kaumatua confronts Little: ‘You are taking us to war’
By: RNZ
PSA response to report into Human Rights Commission
By: Public Service Association
Charter school contracts
By: New Zealand Government
Q+A: Iain Lees-Galloway interviewed by Corin Dann
By: TVNZ
PM's Post-Cab 21/5/18: Working On It
By: Lyndon Hood
The Nation: Finance Minister Grant Robertson
By: The Nation
Prison crisis: Govts stuck in system that doesn't work
By: RNZ
On ‘Wellbeing budgets', handouts, Eudaimonia and Stoicism
By: Joseph Cederwall
New focus on re-integration to reduce re-offending
By: New Zealand Government
Reckless Govt willing to gamble public safety
By: New Zealand National Party
Budget pours more money into failed criminal justice system
By: People Against Prisons Aotearoa
Praise for JustSpeak’s new report ‘The Case Against Prisons’
By: People Against Prisons Aotearoa
NZ to gift White Horse to Nikko Tōshōgū Shrine in Japan
By: New Zealand Government
View as: DESKTOP | MOBILEWe're in BETA! Send Feedback © Scoop Media