INDEPENDENT NEWS

National & ACT Ignore Human Rights Pledge

Published: Wed 20 Sep 2017 10:01 AM
National and ACT ignore human rights pledge
Why are people sleeping in cars and lining up at food banks in our country?
Seventy years ago, our then Prime Minister Peter Fraser helped forge The United Nations Declaration of Human Rights.
Article 25 asserts that the basics of life, such as food and shelter are human rights, not matters for charity.
It states:
1. Everyone has the right to a standard of living adequate for the health and well-being of himself and of his family, including food, clothing, housing and medical care and necessary social services, and the right to security in the event of unemployment, sickness, disability, widowhood, old age or other lack of livelihood in circumstances beyond his control.
2. Motherhood and childhood are entitled to special care and assistance.
3. All children, whether born in or out of wedlock, shall enjoy the same social protection.
So where do today’s political parties stand on those rights?
A recent survey organised by documentary maker Bryan Bruce canvassed all parties that have the possibility of reaching 5% of the Party Vote in the upcoming General Election. Each was emailed a copy of Article 25 and asked whether or not they would pledge to uphold those principles if elected to govern, and would “not vote for any bill or budget which diminishes those rights for any New Zealander?”
The Greens, Labour, New Zealand First, The Maori Party and TOP all signed that pledge.
National ignored repeated requests for a response (except for Ian McKelvie), as did ACT.
Mana leader Hone Harawira did not sign, stating that he believed Mana’s policies “are better and far more comprehensive than those listed in the pledge.”
“The Universal Declaration of Human Rights is not binding,” said Bruce, “but it concerns me that things we once declared were fundamental human rights are increasingly being treated as if they were matters for charity.”
“When I see people sleeping on the street and lining up at food banks,” I think, it’s time we asked ourselves some basic moral questions, said Bruce.
“Which is why I thought surveying the parties on their attitude to the basic human rights listed in Article 25 would provide useful information for voters to know as they decide who should govern us.”
“I think the results speak for themselves,” said Bruce.
“Parties who refuse to respond to repeated emails on matters of fundamental moral principle, do in fact send you an arrogant message ‘We’re not interested. We don’t care. Human rights are a nuisance and not part of our core business.”
“Well, I hope the electorate express a more compassionate view towards their fellow Kiwis this election,” said Bruce.
ENDS

Next in New Zealand politics

One-stop Shop Major Projects On The Fast Track
By: New Zealand Government
GPS 2024: Over $20 Billion To Get Transport Back On Track
By: New Zealand Government
New Zealand Provides Further Humanitarian Support To Gaza And The West Bank
By: New Zealand Government
High Court Judge Appointed
By: New Zealand Government
Lobbyists Riding Shotgun With Coalition Government
By: New Zealand Labour Party
Say Hello To NZ’s Most Anti-environment Government In Decades
By: Green Party
Fast Track Is Outright Assault On Environment
By: Forest And Bird
Coalition Sticking Plasters Over New Zealand’s Infrastructure Crisis
By: New Zealand Taxpayers' Union
A Fast Track To A More Sure-footed Future
By: Infrastructure NZ
GPS 2024: New $500 Million Pothole Prevention Fund
By: New Zealand Government
GPS 2024: 15 New Roads Of National Significance
By: New Zealand Government
GPS 2024: Keeping New Zealanders Safer On Our Roads
By: New Zealand Government
GPS 2024: Investing In Reliable Public Transport
By: New Zealand Government
View as: DESKTOP | MOBILE © Scoop Media