Q+A: Anthony Wilson and Andrew Little

Published: Sun 25 Jun 2017 12:45 PM
Q+A: Anthony Wilson interviewed by Jessica Mutch | Andrew Little also interviewed by Jessica Mutch
Marae speaks out over Labour accommodation scandal
The head of the Auckland marae at the centre of a Labour party scandal involving disgruntled foreign interns says the people of the marae feel maligned by the accusations of substandard accommodation.
Speaking on TVNZ 1’s Q+A this morning, Awataha Marae head Anthony Wilson told Jessica Mutch the North Shore marae facilities were as good as any other marae.
“We’ve heard statements saying we’ve got slum conditions and second rate. As a people, we take that really seriously,” he said, adding that the first the marae had heard about the complaints were through the media.
“We’ve had tens of thousands of people use our facilities over the years, and we’ve never had a complaint of this sort of nature before.”
He said some stories of positive feedback had begun emerging and the marae was still hosting around 60 of the interns who were happy to stay.
“The people that work at the marae, many of them are elders. They are hardworking people. They’re community-based people, and they don’t deserve to be maligned like this,” he said.
Labour leader Andrew Little told Jessica Mutch the marae had not deserved the criticism.
“That is a good marae. It is well set up. It’s got good facilities. It’s got fantastic leadership,” Mr Little said.
He said he had not spoken to former Labour Auckland head Matt McCarten, who organised the scheme, since the controversy erupted.
Please find attached the full transcript of the interview and here’s the Links: Anthony Wilson & Andrew Little
Q+A, 9-10am Sundays on TVNZ 1 and one hour later on TVNZ 1 + 1.
Repeated Sunday evening at around 11:35pm. Streamed live at
Thanks to the support from NZ On Air.
Q + A
Episode 16
Interviewed by Jessica Mutch
JESSICAJoining me now is Labour leader Andrew Little. Thank you for your time this morning. What’s your response to Bill English’s interview there? Do you think he’s been honest with the public over this?
ANDREWNo, he hasn’t, and you go back to the interview he gave in March this year when he has asked if he had any contact with anybody involved in that issue, and he said he had no direct contact. We can go back over all the events of 2016. It’s what he’s done this year as prime minister that I think is telling. When he had the opportunity to tell it how it was first thing Tuesday morning, he again dissembled, divaricated, delayed, and even after all that came out later that day, in Parliament this week he made the statement that he approached the police, when the opposite was true. This was a total failure of leadership on his part, and it goes to his integrity and his credibility, and he’s been found wanting.
JESSICAIt sounds like you’re calling for his resignation there.
ANDREWI didn’t say he should have resigned. I think, just, people should know that the guy who set himself up as the straight shooter isn’t a straight shooter. It’s one thing to try to avoid embarrassment to other people; it’s one thing to try to avoid embarrassment for yourself which every politician does. But when you say something is not true that demonstrably is or, say, something that is true that isn’t, that is a completely different kettle of fish. He had nothing to lose in March this year by being honest, by saying he had contact with the people involved. Nothing to lose at all. He had nothing to lose on Tuesday morning, saying he had been told by Todd Barclay that he had made a recording. Nothing to lose at all, but he chose not to do that.
JESSICAAre there times, though, in politics, where politicians, including yourself, have to be economical with the truth and sometimes get caught out?
ANDREWI think it’s not at all unusual for politicians in answering questions on certain things to try to preserve the dignity and reputation of others. I think you do try to do that. Sometimes you are caught by a sense of your own embarrassment, and you know you might not say absolutely everything that there is to be said. Eventually you ought—you’ve got to front up, because if you don’t, you will be caught out. And what has happened here is that an issue that’s been festering for 18 months is people have been caught out. And look, it goes back beyond just what has happened this year, but it goes back a long way. In the end, leadership isn’t about arse covering; it’s about what you do faced with difficult circumstances, and the real challenge of leadership is when you’re dealing with colleagues, including close colleagues or comrades, and sometimes you have to front up and say, ‘That’s wrong. It’s got to change.’
JESSICAShould the prime minister and other senior members of the National party have handled Todd Barclay better? He had a lot of very senior mentors in that party. He worked for a lot of MPs. Did they fail him?
ANDREWIt looks to me from the outside like that he didn’t have the support and mentoring that he should have had. Look, employment relationships do break down. Let’s remember this whole thing isn’t about an employment relationship breaking down. It was about alleged illegal conduct in terms of recording a staff member. It’s about a police investigation, where originally Todd Barclay said he would cooperate, then he didn’t, and that only came out earlier this year, so he should have had people around him saying, ‘Todd, that’s not the way you do things,’ and when, at the end of last year, Todd Barclay was going around saying, ‘There was no recording;’ he didn’t make any recordings knowing that to be completely untrue. And Bill English of all people knew that to be untrue, because he’d made statements to the police that were the opposite to that. He should have called him out.
JESSICAWhat would you have done if you were in that position and one of your MPs had come to you with that?
ANDREWIf I was aware that an MP in my caucus was the subject of a police investigation, I would say, ‘You are obliged to cooperate.’ I don’t get the thing about ‘I’ve got a legal right to stay silent’. You’re an MP. You’re an elected official. Public trust and confidence in you is absolutely vital. You are not like every other citizen. You have privilege, and you must be required to cooperate with the police, because that’s what our kind of system of confidence in our democratic institutions requires.
JESSICAWatching this play out, what did you personally learn from this?
ANDREWThat I think it’s—You do have to step up and take responsibility straight away. I mean, that’s what I was confronted with – a situation that I was frankly horrified with in our party earlier this week. When I heard about the complaints of those students about the way they were being treated, found out that they were here because people closely associated with the Labour party had got them here and made promises to them, I said to the party, ‘We must take moral responsibility. We step in and we clean it up.’ We didn’t wait until the media story broke to respond. We responded straightaway. The story came out, but leadership is about taking responsibility and doing the right thing.
JESSICABut in this case, was that the right thing to do? Because as we’ve seen this play out over the last few days, students have come out sticking up for the conditions in the marae, saying that they’ve enjoyed the programme, do you feel like maybe if you’d taken a bit of time, stepped back, perhaps gone to the marae and assessed it for yourself, you may have been able to handle this another way instead of saying, ‘Look, we did this wrong.’ Was that the right approach in this circumstance?
ANDREWThe right approach was once we got notification of complaints, or as the party did and I was told about it, I said, ‘We get up there straight away.’ The general secretary Andrew Kirton and his team did an outstanding job. He was there on Monday, talked to the students, started getting things sorted out. The reality is some did want to have different arrangements. Many of them, the vast majority, have said look they want to stay, they’re excited by the programme and they want to carry on doing it.
JESSICAHow many are staying?
ANDREWI don’t know what the final number is. As of yesterday, it was about 60 of the 85. I think they’re still working through some of the final ones. So many of them. It goes back to the story about confronted with something that you might find personally uncomfortable or embarrassing, your personal feelings aren’t the issue. It’s when you’ve got people’s livelihoods at stake and their welfare at stake, you step in and do the right thing. If you’re the head of an organisation, it’s not about you, it’s about the organisation. And if you’re the Prime Minister of a country, it’s about the country, its values and its standards. That’s what you’ve got to stick up for. That’s what the Prime Minister’s role is about.
JESSICALet’s talk about that, then. How did it get out of control? Was it a lack of organisation on the part of Labour?
ANDREWNo. This started out as an idea at the beginning of the year. I certainly became aware of it. When it was raised with me, I’ve said it’s a campaign issue, a party issue, you’ve got to deal with it—
JESSICABut it had Labour’s name on it, though.
ANDREWAnd it did.
JESSICAIt was called the 2017 Labour Campaign Fellowship.
ANDREW Yeah, because people closely associated with the Labour Party were involved. Without approval, authority or any mandate, they went ahead and did stuff. The next I became aware was about May this year, when the party was getting messages from students within days of arriving. The party then stepped in straight away to people who are associated with it, said, ‘What is going on? There is no approval for this. This is not the party thing.’ The party was given assurances, ‘We’ve got funding. We’ve got a programme sorted out. Nothing to worry about.’
JESSICABut there was something to worry about, wasn’t there?
ANDREWThere was, yeah. And we got the complaints this week. And the minute that happened, because we were aware that the Labour Party name was associated with it, it’s not about legal technicalities – I take a very dim view of those who hide behind legalities – and say it is moral responsibility that is the most important thing. We take responsibility.
JESSICABut Matt McCarten has been a bit of a fall guy for you guys this week. He’s been mentioned a lot taking responsibility for this. Have you talked to him about that in the last few days?
ANDREWI haven’t personally spoken to him about it. And, yeah, he has been. He’s been involved in it.
JESSICAIs he the fall guy?
ANDREWI don’t know what you mean about ‘fall guy’.
JESSICAHas he taken responsibility for how this played out?
ANDREWI haven’t spoken to him. I’m sure others have. I haven’t spoken to him. The priority – and I said to the party right from the outset once we got those complaints last weekend – the priority is the wellbeing of those young people. That’s what we focus on now. That’s what this week has been about. Next week and the weeks that follow, there are still questions to be answered. We’ll get on top of all that.
JESSICAWhy not use New Zealanders for this kind of work?
ANDREWWe have thousands of New Zealanders in our campaign. We’ve got the most campaign activists signed up to our campaign.
JESSICABut why do we need those foreign students coming in or interns coming in?
ANDREWWe’ve been part of – and actually the National Party will have been too – part of international political internship programmes for donkey’s years. We’ve had people – very small numbers – involved in our campaigns in the past. We send young Labour people, National Party sends young National people, off to the United States, to Australia, to the UK, to participate in internship programmes that means they get to see a campaign, get to know about another country and its political systems. That happens worldwide. That’s what this was a part of. It got way beyond people’s ability to control. We’ve stepped in to take over.
JESSICAThe marae has had some really bad PR over this. Has that been fair?
ANDREWNo. Totally unfair. That is a good marae. It is well set up. It’s got good facilities. It’s got fantastic leadership.
JESSICASo how did this happen, then? Why are the students complaining?
ANDREWThe students did complain. That’s just a fact. You get the complaints, you deal with it. And I’m not one of those people who goes around quibbling about, ‘Oh, it’s only one person or two people or three people.’ There is a complaint, you get stuck in, you get involved, you find out, you deal with the people, you know those who are saying there are things wrong. You’ve got to deal with it. That’s what taking responsibility is about. And even if it is embarrassing, as it was for us, you’ve got to step in and do the right thing at the right time, and that’s what we did.
JESSICAThank you very much for your time this morning. Really appreciate it.
Q + A
Episode 16
Interviewed by Jessica Mutch
JESSICAAnthony Wilson is head of the marae in question – Awataha Marae on Auckland’s North Shore – and he joins me now. Thank you very much for being with us this morning.
JESSICACan you tell me about the conditions that these students stayed in, in your marae?
ANTHONYYeah. First off, I’d like to say that the people of the marae feel a little bit maligned by all the accusations. We’ve heard statements saying we’ve got slum conditions and second rate. As a people, we take that really seriously. We’ve had tens of thousands of people use our facilities over the years, and we’ve never had a complaint of this sort of nature before. I can tell you now we’re not a five-star hotel. Definitely not. We never have said that we are. But in terms of facilities for marae, I think we’re at least on par with other marae that are round there. I saw some of those photos that were out there – the broken shower.
JESSICAAre those accurate?
ANTHONYWhat was not being told was we’ve got eight showers. It’s not like that we only had one shower. And the other thing – the broken cabinet. We get broken things all the time when we have groups of this sort of size and nature using our facilities all the time. So we kind of resent the implications of disgruntled students trying to make a point out of this. I believe it’s quite good now that some of those stories have been outed. I’ve seen a few articles just recently now where the students have actually come out and defended the marae and saying that they had a wonderful time and also the facilities were adequate for what they required.
JESSICAHow many students are still with you and how many have gone home?
ANTHONYLast count there was 60 people for dinner the other night. That’s how we work out how many students are here, because it’s a bit of a rolling number. And last count was about 60 still at the marae.
JESSICAAnd how many complaints did you get over the last few days or few weeks?
ANTHONYWe got no complaints. The only complaints that we saw were in the media. So we had to question what is the legitimacy of those complaints. Was this you know, trying to cause harm to us or was it trying to cause harm to the programme? And subsequently now we realise a lot of those complaints were from disgruntled people who were on the programme.
JESSICADo you feel frustrated at the way that Labour’s put you in this position?
ANTHONYIf you’re asking me whether we’d do it again, the answer is yes, because we are open to anyone using our facilities. The fact that it’s turned into a bit of a political football at the moment, I mean, that’s none of our doing. The people that work at the marae, many of them are elders. They are hardworking people. They come and cook the breakfast in the morning. They’re there to make the lunches every day. And they make the dinners. These are hardworking people. They’re community-based people, and they don’t deserve to be maligned like this.
JESSICALabour’s said that the programme ballooned. Basically more people came in than they expected. How many people were you expecting at the beginning? What did they tell you about that?
ANTHONYI think when they first booked, around 80 people. But we ended up with a few more than that.
JESSICAHow many more? Do you know?
ANTHONYI think up to about 90 by the time that everything started to go pear-shaped. And we brought in extra accommodation to accommodate for the overflow. And what was not said about the facilities was that we’d arranged for them to go—there’s a one-minute walk to another gym, an AUT gym right next to us, so they were able to use other facilities as well.
JESSICAThank you very much for your time this morning. We really appreciate you coming in. Thanks again.

Next in New Zealand politics

Govt Moves On Drug Checking To Keep Young New Zealanders Safer This Summer
By: New Zealand Government
13 Parties Charged By WorkSafe New Zealand Over Whakaari/White Island Tragedy
By: WorkSafe NZ
Progress On Pay Equity For DHB Staff
By: New Zealand Government
Stuff Holds Itself Accountable For Wrongs To Māori
By: Stuff
New Zealand Government To Declare A Climate Emergency
By: New Zealand Government
Crown Accounts Reflect Govt’s Careful Economic Management
By: New Zealand Government
ACT Supports Pill Testing Bill
By: ACT New Zealand
Legal Drug Checking This Festival Season Will Help Protect Our Young People: Green Party
By: Green Party
Timely Decision On Festival Drug Checking Will Save Lives
By: NZ Drug Foundation
Whakaari / White Island Eruption 22nd Death
By: New Zealand Police
Health Minister Priorities Welcomed
By: Association of Salaried Medical Specialists
More Accessible Pay Equity Measures Come Into Force
By: New Zealand Government
Māori Language Commission Welcomes Stuff Announcement
By: Te Taura Whiri i te Reo Maori
Climate Change An Economic Issue; Critical For The Planet’s Future
By: Make Lemonade
Climate Emergency Declaration A Win But Needs Action
By: Greenpeace New Zealand
View as: DESKTOP | MOBILE © Scoop Media