All DHBs Media Release
4 August 2014
PSA Position over Bargaining Disappointing, Say DHBs
The 20 District Health Boards are disappointed that the Public Service Association has decided to seek a mandate from
its members for industrial action in its current bargaining for mental and public health nurses, allied, public health
and technical staff, and clerical workers in the South Island and midlands regions.
Graham Dyer, Chair of the District Health Boards’ Employment Relations Strategy Group and Chief Executive of Hutt and
Wairarapa DHBs said that the union was not recognizing the tight fiscal environment that DHBs are in. This sector has
been largely insulated from the impacts of the global financial crisis, and has continued to have growth in both wages
and numbers of employees. Subsequently the expectations should be tempered as the recovery kicks in. “There remains
severe pressure on the economic delivery of world class health services for all New Zealanders.”
Bargaining for the six collective agreements has been ongoing for between 1 and 12 months. “The co-ordinated timing of
the action is clearly part of some other agenda” Mr Dyer said.
“DHBs have engaged in good faith with the PSA and have made a number of proposals in each of the sets of negotiations to
respond to the issues that the PSA brought to bargaining. Ultimately it is simply about pay.
“DHBs have offered the Nurses and allied staff the same increases that have been accepted by other clinical groups in
“DHBs do not believe there are any reasons to offer these PSA groups more than the increases that were accepted by
“We’ve offered the PSA Nursing and Allied bargaining a 1.5% salary increase for a term of around two years. That’s the
same settlement that’s been accepted by Medical Physicists, Medical Radiation Technologists, Clinical Psychologists and
Medical Laboratory Workers amongst others.”
A number of settlements have been reached for non-clinical workforces including those represented by the Service and
Food Workers Union, the Engineering, Printing & Manufacturing Union, and FIRST Union that are within the same parameters as the offers being made to the PSA.
Mr Dyer said it is disappointing that the PSA are pursuing possible strike action despite participating in sector-level
briefings that clearly set out the financial pressures on DHBs. Current employment arrangements in the DHBs are
recognized as more than meeting the PSA’s ‘decent pay, decent workplaces’ standards.
“We’ve been open with the PSA about the financial challenges that the DHBs face and we’ve managed to reach settlements
with other unions that acknowledge this reality.”
“It’s unclear what the PSA think they are going to achieve for their members, we all know industrial action doesn’t
alter what the DHBs can afford,” said Mr Dyer.
“The DHBs have continued to invest in our workforces during the financial challenges brought on by the global financial
crisis and Canterbury Earthquakes. The health sector hasn’t faced the job cuts that have been a feature of many public
and private sector responses.
“The DHBs are absolutely focused on patient safety. The public can be assured that DHBs will manage the impact of any
action the PSA chooses to take to absolutely minimize its impact on patients and services. We encourage the PSA to get
back to the bargaining table as that’s the only place the pay issue will be resolved.”
for further information.