Winston Peters: The Conspiracy Continues
LawFuel.co.nz - The Law Jobs and News Wire
A lawyer's 'DNA and Blood" are all over Owen Glenn's evidence, says Winston Peters
Owen Glenn's evidence had been 'coached' by his lawyer, Dr Geoff Harley, who had acted against him in the wine box
enquiry, Winston Peters said during the Privileges Committee hearing last night.
He said Dr Harley's "DNA and Blood" are all over the evidence.
Dr Harley is a former Russell McVeagh partner and now practices as a tax barrister. He claimed the evidence demonstrated
an ongoing conspiracy against him going back to the winebox case and was an example of his political enemies out to
destroy him.
The Winebox papers detailed a complex Cook Islands tax scheme used by prominent New Zealand businessmen to reduce tax
liabilities. The hearings ran for almost three years.
"This is an attempt to undo the people's will, bring down a government, then govern alone. My enemies and an elite media
have surely proven that."
Winston Peters' appearance before the Privilege Committee saw him attack Owen Glenn's evidence along with the
explanations given as to the narrow issue of whether he knew about the $100,000 payment made to Peter's lawyer Brian
Henry.
The key conversation occurred on 14 December when Mr Glenn said he called Winston Peters and the couple discussed the
question of a donation. The call was then almost immediately followed by an email from Brian Henry referring to the call
and to "his client". Winston Peters' accepted that the "client" must have been himself and he conceded that the
discussion could have occurred then. His evidence saw him prevaricate and struggle to find an answer to the issue of the
donation issue on that date, as he claimed he did not know anything about the donation until July 2008 when Brian Henry
told him about it.
"I don't have a memory of that, but if you look at it that is the only logical conclusion one can come to -- that he
asked for the details and that's why it was mentioned in the email." He similarly said there had been no thanking of Mr
Glenn at the Karaka sales, as Owen Glenn testified, and that he would not have done such a thing over a large lunch
table with 14 others.
Mr Peters laid considerable store by what "professional people" and "business people" did and what amounted to good
manners, such as writing to acknowledge a gift rather than saying a casual 'thank you'.
Mr Peters told the committee, again, that there had been no donation to his New Zealand First Party or to him
personally.
"The answer than was no, and the answer is still no," he said.
He has already stood down from his portfolios of foreign affairs, racing and associate senior citizens because of a
Serious Fraud Office inquiry into other donations to NZ First.
ENDS