The Electoral Commission met this afternoon to consider a range of matters raised with it under the Electoral Finance
Act.
- A decision on whether to list the EPMU as a third party was reached after careful consideration of submissions and
legal advice. This decision will be written up and communicated to the union and the objector to its listing by early
next week, and made public at that time.
- The commission considered whether two different pamphlets produced by separate parties were election advertisements
encouraging people to vote in a particular way and so required promoter statements. It determined that one was and one
was not. It resolved, in keeping with its general practice, to seek compliance in the first instance and to use the
examples for education of party secretaries and financial agents. Parties would be put on notice that any similar
breaches would be referred to the Police for consideration for prosecution unless inconsequential to the public
interest. This communication to parties will be published here when completed.
- The commission resolved to seek Crown Law advice relating to:
* legal arguments made by the Labour Party about the correct form of promoter statement that a CD it distributed should
have had on it.
* whether a party passing to a journalist a pamphlet (that might be regarded as an election advertisement if published
to the public) was published when handed to a journalist at a party conference. It determined that the pamphlet would be
an election advertisement and require a promoter statement if this was the case.
- The commission deferred consideration of whether a balloon bearing a party logo and website address was an election
advertisement pending Crown Law advice previously sought, while a range of complaints relating to online activity remain
under consideration.
The commission will not be making further public comment relating to these decisions beyond that published here or
mentioned as pending, above.
Note attachment.
ENDS
www.elections.org.nz