Report reveals bias against older workers

Published: Mon 30 Oct 2006 12:54 AM
Press Release
Human Rights Commission
Embargoed for publication Monday October 30
Report reveals bias against short listing older workers
Employers may be at substantial legal risk from age discrimination when short-listing applicants for jobs, warns EEO Commissioner, Dr Judy McGregor.
New research commissioned for the Human Rights Commission shows that 25 year olds are six to 12 times more likely to be short listed than 55 year olds for human resource positions and six to 10 times more likely to be short listed for sales positions. Recruiters also compound age discrimination effects in short listing in these areas.
“The results show that either consciously or unconsciously age is being used to screen out otherwise suitable applicants which is incredibly short-sighted in terms of the labour market skills shortage, the available talents of mature workers and the value of their experience”, she said.
She was commenting on research undertaken by Professor Marie Wilson of the University of Auckland Business School and graduate student Jordan Kan that looked at barriers for entry into employment for older job applicants in three sectors-sales, human resources administration and nursing.
Part of the research used similar written applications for 75 advertised positions. The only difference in the applications was the age of the candidate and three age bands were used: 25plus, 40plus and 55plus. All of the “pretend” applications were European/Pakeha men with "ordinary" first and surnames. The candidates were equivalent in their recent, relevant experience and education. If a broader or lengthier working experience was relevant, then older workers would be preferred.
However the study showed that older candidates - both those aged 40 plus and 55 plus years - were rated far behind their younger counterparts in sales and human resource administration. Older women also suffer slightly more disadvantage, according to the study. In nursing, while employers may harbour preferences for younger applicants, the acute labour shortage meant that the age factor was moderated by scarcity and older nurses as well as younger nurses received positive responses to job applications.
In discussions with potential employers during the research the key factor that differentiated older and younger employees was the assumed flexibility and adaptability of younger workers. The youngest applicants were described as “trainable”, easy to “get up to speed” and “go-getters”. Applicants aged 40 were described as “settled” and older applicants were described as “set in their ways”.
One employer responded to three similar applicants differentiated by age only in the following way- he invited the youngest applicant in for a chat about whether he wanted to train for the post, the middle aged candidate was told his “experience was not relevant” and the 55 year old candidate was told his “qualifications didn’t meet the requirements of the company” despite no qualifications being specified.
Professor Wilson said the research showed that “rationales for discriminatory selection are stereotypical, incorrect and very openly expressed, demonstrating limited awareness of ageism in employment, even amongst recruitment and selection professionals.”
Jobs with high, medium and low skill shortages were chosen for study including nursing, sales and human resource administration. A variety of methods such as a field experiment, simulation and interviews were used to assess employer preferences (were the applicants seen as suitable), employment outcomes (were applicants short-listed) and employer rationales (why were some candidates preferred over others).
Professor Wilson said the research showed that younger workers were seen as more suitable and were significantly more likely to be short-listed. She said the research served as a reminder that employment discrimination may be a continuing problem at a time when no employer can afford to over look talent. “Not hiring on the basis of age is not just bad business, it is clearly illegal” she said.
+ Barriers to entry for the older worker, new research commissioned by the Human Rights Commission and conducted by Professor Marie Wilson and Jordan Kan of the University of Auckland Business School. For a copy see (News and Issues)

Next in New Zealand politics

No politicians at Rātana in 2021 as celebrations made exclusive for church adherents
Ongoing Worker Dissatisfaction Shows Need For Fundamental Change
By: New Zealand Council of Trade Unions
The 16 Of Waikeria Have Surrendered
By: The Maori Party
Border Exception For Some Returning International Tertiary Students
By: New Zealand Government
Additional Actions To Keep COVID-19 Out Of NZ
By: New Zealand Government
Vaccine Only Part Of The Cure For Resumption Of Pacific Travel: World Bank Report
By: World Bank Group
Waikeria Prison Riot Must Be Investigated
By: New Zealand National Party
Prisoner Disorder Event At Waikeria Prison Over
By: New Zealand Government
Kelvin Davis Has Plenty Of Questions To Answer
By: New Zealand National Party
Māori Party Calls For Minister Of Corrections To Step In To Resolve Waikeria Situation Immediately
By: The Maori Party
ExportNZ Welcomes Back International Students
By: Export NZ
Pre-departure Covid-19 Tests Should Be Extended
By: New Zealand National Party
Government Must Act To Avoid Another Lockdown
By: ACT New Zealand
National Calls For Vaccine Rollout To Be Fast-tracked
By: New Zealand National Party
View as: DESKTOP | MOBILE © Scoop Media