INDEPENDENT NEWS

Income support proposals fail

Published: Fri 27 Oct 2006 01:01 PM
PRESS RELEASE:
Income support proposals fail children, say advocates
26 October, 2006
Child Poverty Action Group (CPAG) is concerned that the proposed changes to the treatment of beneficiaries announced today appear to have overlooked the needs of children in a drive to push parents into the workforce.
“Children’s needs do not seem to be part of the ‘work first’ picture. Secure, adequate family income – not parental employment - is the first important requirement of child wellbeing,” says CPAG economics spokesperson Dr Susan St John.
“This government has failed to lift benefit incomes since coming to power. Net income gains from the generous Working for Families package have been nearly nil for 175,000 children in families on benefits. The present focus on getting parents into work ignores the woefully inadequate income many families endure,” said Dr St John.
CPAG health spokesperson, paediatrician Professor Innes Asher, expressed concern about the proposed changes. “National health statistics show that New Zealand's large income gap contributes to the poor health of low-income earners and their children. The failure to address these low incomes is bad news for the kids in our poorest families."
CPAG is also concerned about the effects on the wider community. “Community workers tell us they have grave concerns for the children of parents pushed off benefits into unsuitable jobs,” says researcher Donna Wynd.
"Here we have a government that refuses to acknowledge that caring for children makes a worthwhile contribution to society. Looking after children is real work, but only if someone else is paid to do it. Sole parents need much better support and recognition of the importance of their parenting role. Even more worrying is that there may be sanctions of up to 50% of a household’s benefit for failures to comply with new work requirements,” Wynd says.
Dr St John also expressed concern that the legislation, due out in December, would be rushed through without full public consultation and input. “It is important that these major changes are scrutinised through the select committee process,” she said. “Everyone has an interest in our children’s wellbeing, and the legislative process must reflect this.”
Ends

Next in New Zealand politics

Fair Pay Agreements To Improve Pay And Conditions For Essential Workers
By: New Zealand Government
Government Sets Pay And Workforce Expectations For The Public Sector
By: New Zealand Government
Budget 2021 Reprioritises Nearly $1 Billion
By: New Zealand Government
Statement On The Speaker And Annual Review Debate
By: New Zealand Government
Mallard Fails To Give Taxpayers A Straight Answer
By: New Zealand National Party
Independent Review To Explore Future For Local Government
By: New Zealand Government
PM Ardern And PM Morrison - Commencement Of Two-way Quarantine-free Travel Between Australia And New Zealand
By: New Zealand Government
Labour Stuck In 1970s With National Awards 2.0
By: New Zealand National Party
ACT Would Repeal Undemocratic Compulsory Unionism
By: ACT New Zealand
Bus Drivers And Supermarket Workers Will Welcome Fair Pay Agreements
By: First Union
E tū Welcomes Next Steps For Fair Pay Agreements
By: E tu
Fair Pay Agreements Should Be Terminated
By: Business NZ
FPAs Have No Place In Modern Workplace - Canterbury Chamber
By: Canterbury Employers' Chamber Of Commerce
No Positive Outcomes From FPA Proposal
By: EMA
Fair Pay Agreements Good News For Employees - Contractors Need Protection Too
By: Public Service Association
View as: DESKTOP | MOBILE © Scoop Media