GI Bill Falls Short
The Geographical Indications (Wine and Spirits) Registration Bill was reported back to Parliament yesterday by the
Foreign Affairs Defence and Trade select committee.
The Bill seeks to clarify and strengthen the legal protections for well-known local and international wine and spirit
names with geographical indications (GIs). [1] However, Thomas Chin, chief executive of the Distilled Spirits
Association fears the committee has fallen short of fully protecting GI wine and spirits from misuse or
misrepresentation.
“We were initially buoyed by the review of this important intellectual property law, but to find that all of our
proposed amendments have been disregarded by the committee is really disappointing,” says Mr Chin.
“The recent failure of the WTO to reach a multi-lateral agreement protecting international wine and spirit GIs places
even more importance on this New Zealand Bill being robust and effective.”
The Association appealed for three main inclusions in the GI Bill. Firstly, clearer definitions for spirits and
liqueurs, which are currently inaccurate and do not adequately describe the range of spirits and liqueurs that exist on
the market.
Secondly, a tough infringements and enforcement regime be put in place, as opposed to relying on other jurisdictions and
statutes to penalise people who imitate or exploit GI wines and spirits.
Thirdly, the Association suggested that it be made an expert member of the GI registrations committee to provide counsel
on such matters, especially given its expertise and interest in spirit GI issues.
“It’s a real shame to see the opportunity to create a higher standard of honesty on all wine and spirit product labeling
missed. To survive and grow, legitimate GI producers need to know that their intellectual property is well-protected,
and this Bill is sadly lacking in key areas”.
Mr Chin says the new legislation should deter counterfeiters of products that can only legally be produced in a
designated district, region or area, such as Cognac and Tequila.
“Without appropriate consequences and legislation, these people will continue to go about their illegal and damaging
behaviour.”
“We urge the House to reconsider the Association’s proposals before its too late and move to safeguard famous and
well-established wine and spirit names from exploitation.”
ENDS.