INDEPENDENT NEWS

Judgment: Mafart and Prieur V Television NZ

Published: Thu 11 May 2006 01:30 PM
MAFART And PRIEUR V TELEVISION NEW ZEALAND LIMITED SC 50/2005 [11 May 2006]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW ZEALAND
SC 50/2005
[2006] NZSC 33
BETWEEN ALAIN MICHAEL YVES MAFART AND DOMINIQUE ANGELA FRANCOISE PRIEUR
Appellants
AND TELEVISION NEW ZEALAND LIMITED
Respondent
Hearing: 22 November 2005
Court: Elias CJ, Blanchard, Tipping, McGrath and Eichelbaum JJ
Counsel: G P Curry and S L Cogan for Appellants
W Akel for Respondent
Judgment: 11 May 2006
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
A. The Court of Appeal has jurisdiction under s 66 of the Judicature Act 1908 to hear an appeal from a determination of a Judge of the High Court on an application under the Criminal Proceedings (Search of Court Records) Rules 1974. The Court of Appeal was wrong to hold it had no jurisdiction and the appeal on this point is allowed.
B. The case is remitted to the Court of Appeal for determination of the appeal from the judgment of Simon France J dated 23 May 2005.
C. The respondent must pay the appellants $15,000 for their costs with disbursements to be fixed if necessary by the Registrar.
Costs in the Court of Appeal are reversed in favour of the appellants.
See... Full Judgment (PDF)
ENDS

Next in New Zealand politics

Just 1 In 6 Oppose ‘Three Strikes’ - Poll
By: Family First New Zealand
Budget Blunder Shows Nicola Willis Could Cut Recovery Funding
By: New Zealand Labour Party
Urgent Changes To System Through First RMA Amendment Bill
By: New Zealand Government
Global Military Spending Increase Threatens Humanity And The Planet
By: Peace Movement Aotearoa
Government To Introduce Revised Three Strikes Law
By: New Zealand Government
Environmental Protection Vital, Not ‘Onerous’
By: New Zealand Labour Party
View as: DESKTOP | MOBILE © Scoop Media