INDEPENDENT NEWS

Sipa and Edwards v The Queen

Published: Tue 28 Mar 2006 04:03 PM
SIPA And Anor V R SC 4/2006 [28 March 2006]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW ZEALAND
SC 4/2006
SC 5/2006
[2006] NZSC 15
JOSEPH JUNIOR SIPA
TESSA JEAN EDWARDS
v
THE QUEEN
Court: Tipping, McGrath and Anderson JJ
Counsel: M Starling for Appellants
F E Guy Kidd and M J Inwood for Crown
Judgment: 28 March 2006
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
[1] Leave to appeal is granted in both these cases, which have been considered
together as they raise common issues.
[2] The ground approved, in terms of Rule 29, is whether, before allowing the
Solicitor-General’s appeals, the Court of Appeal should, in the circumstances of the present cases, have expressly offered the appellants the opportunity to appeal against their convictions and thereby to seek their setting aside and the remission of the cases to the District Court for reconsideration of their pleas.
Solicitors:
F S Legal, Christchurch for Appellants
Crown Law Office, Wellington
ENDS

Next in New Zealand politics

Ruawai Leader Slams Kaipara Council In Battle Over $400k Property
By: Susan Botting - Local Democracy Reporter
Another ‘Stolen Generation’ Enabled By Court Ruling On Waitangi Tribunal Summons
By: Te Pati Maori
Die In for Palestine Marks ANZAC day
By: Peace Action Wellington
Penny Drops – But What About Seymour And Peters?
By: New Zealand Labour Party
PM Announces Changes To Portfolios
By: New Zealand Government
Just 1 In 6 Oppose ‘Three Strikes’ - Poll
By: Family First New Zealand
View as: DESKTOP | MOBILE © Scoop Media