3 May 2005 - Wellington
Albatross rescue plan endangered
What is the National Plan of Action?
The National Plan of Action to Reduce the Incidental Catch of Seabirds in New Zealand Fisheries was announced in April
2004 and aims to address the serious decline in seabird populations (including albatross) that results from commercial
fishing in New Zealand waters.
The key part of the National Plan of Action was voluntary action by fishers through codes of practice that aim to reduce
the number of seabirds killed as a result of commercial fishing. In addition there were a range of alternative measures
that officials were to consider and a number of these had set time tables.
The Government reserved powers in the National Plan of Action to make mitigation measures mandatory if progress was
inadequate.
How many seabirds are killed by fishing in New Zealand?
Over 10,000 seabirds are estimated to be killed in New Zealand's Exclusive Economic Zone every year as a result of
commercial fishing. Precise numbers are unknown because most commercial fishing vessels do not have independent
observers.
Why is New Zealand called the albatross capital of the World?
New Zealand is called the albatross capital of the World because 14 out of the World's 21 albatross species breed within
New Zealand's Exclusive Economic Zone. Most are globally threatened with extinction.
What are the problems with the National Plan of Action?
The National Plan of Action has relied too heavily on voluntary measures and does not require mitigation measures that
have been proven to work in the Southern Ocean and in the Falklands and South Georgia fisheries.
All of the deadlines in the National Plan of Action's timetable have been missed. This brings the entire process into
disrepute, undermines New Zealand's international reputation and will prolong the unnecessary slaughter of seabirds.
While New Zealand has internationally championed the new Agreement for the Conservation of Albatross and Petrels which
entered into force in November 2004, as a country, we have failed to make the changes needed to protect albatross and
other seabirds at home.
What are the deadlines that have been missed?
There are a series of deadlines that relate to the establishment of codes of practice to reduce seabird by-catch in
commercial fishing operations. Further deadlines relate to the adoption of compulsory use of tori lines, new
legislation, economic instruments and issues relating to customary fishing.
Which fisheries were the codes of practice meant to cover?
The initial codes of practice were divided into two industry groups:
* Group One codes include: ling autoline, joint venture tuna, hoki trawl, and squid trawl fisheries; and *
Group Two codes include: ling longline, bluenose longline, snapper longline, scampi trawl and domestic tuna fisheries.
What progress has been made?
Group One codes
Group One codes were supposed to be implemented by 1 October 2004. So far only the chartered (joint venture) tuna code
of practice has been approved, several months late, by the officials working group. This code covers 5 or 6 vessels.
While three other draft Group One codes have been proposed they have not been approved by the officials group and as of
last month the officials had not received a response from the industry groups to their concerns. These draft codes have
inadequate targets and timetables for action to reduce seabird bycatch.
Group Two codes
A report on progress on developing Group Two codes was supposed to be reported to the Technical Working Group by October
2004. There was no report. No Group Two codes of practice have been approved. Last week a meeting to discuss Group Two
codes was cancelled because there were no codes to discuss. These codes were supposed to be developed and approved by 30
March for implementation by 30 June.
The additional deadlines
The National Plan of Action also set out timetables for taking additional action. These included:
* Detailed proposals on the mandatory use of tori lines in all longline fisheries prior to a final decision by 30
September 2004. * Options for using economic instruments by 20 December 2004; * Options for amending legislation
to enable action against individual vessels by 20 December 2004; * Discussion with iwi on information on the impact
of customary fisheries on seabird and development of proposals by 20 December 2004.
Again, none of these dates have been met. There are still no discussion papers on tori lines, use of economic
instruments, options for amending legislation or the management of customary fisheries.
What can the Government do?
The National Plan of Action gives the Minister's of Fisheries and Conservation the authority to take action to make
codes of practice mandatory.
The Plan of Action says:
The implementation of codes of practice and their contents will be made mandatory under the Fisheries Act in any of the
following circumstances:
* there is inadequate sign-up to the code by fishers within the specified timeframe; or * the measures adopted by
fishers in voluntary codes are inadequate to achieve the goals and objectives of the NPOA; or * following the
five-yearly review of the effectiveness of the NPOA, voluntary codes of practice are determined to be ineffective in
achieving the goals and objectives of the NPOA.
As there are no codes and as the draft codes are inadequate, the Ministers can now intervene to establish mandatory
codes of practice.
Would mandatory codes of practice work?
New Zealand boats fishing in Antarctic waters have to comply with mandatory codes of practice to reduce the deaths of
seabirds from long-line fishing. Even the Falkland Islands and South Georgia have managed to reduce seabird bycatch by
over 90% through the use of compulsory measures.
Japanese tuna boats have 100% observer coverage and strict mitigation requirements. This has reduced seabird by-kill
from 4,000 birds per year to under 20 individual birds. These requirements still do not apply to New Zealand boats. A
New Zealand tuna fishing boat caught 300 seabirds in a single month.
What measures should mandatory codes of practice contain?
The measures are remarkably straightforward and New Zealand boats fishing in Antarctic waters already use them. The
measures that reduce by-catch are:
* Fishers should not discharge offal from fish processing. The smell of offal is like a massive neon sign flashing
"takeaways" and attracts albatross and petrels from huge distances downwind.
* Bird scaring streamers, called 'tori' lines, help to keep albatross and petrels away from the hooks during line
setting and can also be used by trawlers.
* Thawed (rather than still-frozen) baits don't float on the surface before being pulled under by the main line
and so birds don't get caught.
* Fishing at night, when most albatross are less active, reduces the numbers of birds that are caught. However
this is not as effective for petrels, which also feed at night.
* Weighting the lines, which means that the baits sink more rapidly - quickly pulls the baited hooks below the
birds' reach.
* Two observers on board ensures that these techniques are used and enable any seabird deaths are recorded.
ENDS