"Double Standards" in Government's Acceptance of Corngate Payout
The government is showing double-standards in accepting payment from TV3 for the 'Corngate' broadcast and should return
the money.
The payment to the Crown follows confirmation of a decision by Broadcasting Standards Authority decision.
Just months ago the Broadcasting Standards Authority similarly upheld a complaint and found against TV1 despite the
broadcaster's defence that the decision meant the government Minister involved was misleading the New Zealand public.
"The money being paid to the Crown should be returned as a gesture of reconciliation with TV3, and they should all move
on," says Jon Carapiet from GE Free NZ in food and environment.
"There is a degree of hypocrisy in the government accepting money from TV3 on the one hand, but seeming to benefit from
a misleading broadcast when it suits them."
The earlier decision by the BSA found an interview featuring the Minister of the Environment - also about GE- had itself
been unfair and misleading.
The interview by Paul Holmes went to air only days before the lapse of the moratorium on applications for GM release.
Like the pre-election Corngate broadcast the interview came at a crucial time politically.
Arguing against the decision TV1 said the Minster had backed up the broadcasters statements and would therefore also
have been guilty of misleading the New Zealand public.
Despite TV1's claim, the BSA upheld the complaint against them in a landmark decision though it did not fine either the
TV station, or the Minister for the breach of standards.