INDEPENDENT NEWS

Whose Security Does APEC Want To Protect?

Published: Mon 28 Oct 2002 09:20 PM
For immediate release: 26 October 2002
Whose Security Does APEC Want To Protect?
"APEC’s globalisation agenda and US notions of global security are a lethal combination. They are a recipe for greater insecurity, not less," says Auckland University Professor Jane Kelsey, reporting from the Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) forum in Los Cabos, Mexico.
Kelsey says APEC ministers at the forum may be right when they say that “terrorism, in all its forms, is a threat to economic stability in APEC, as well as a threat to regional peace and security and a direct challenge to their vision of free, open and prosperous economies.”
"But their solution," says Kelsey, "does nothing to address the causes of insecurity or terrorism."
She says the ministers have committed themselves yet again to suppressing the financing of terrorism and at the same time ensuring that APEC achieves its free trade and investment goals. The APEC Business Advisory Council (ABAC) warned that anti-terrorist measures must not disrupt trade, but "opportunistically" sought to maximize the opportunities from developing new surveillance technologies, strengthening energy security and streamlining transport systems.
"APEC refuses to question the link between economic globalization and people’s growing sense of insecurity. By hiding behind the “economic” nature of the forum, it also avoids confronting foreign policy questions that would make some APEC members feel very uncomfortable" she observes.
US Secretary of State Colin Powell with support from some ministers reportedly used an informal dinner to lobby governments to support the US hard-line resolution at the Security Council. At the formal ministerial press briefing Powell insisted that a more open global economy holds the key to "growth, opportunity and hope."
Kelsey says she heard a number of Mexican anti-APEC activists outside the forum ask what hope the United States offered to the millions of Iraqi children who are dying as a result of US sanctions and the thousands more who will become “collateral damage” in the forthcoming war. They also questioned how the US support for the Israeli occupation of Palestine gives hope to the Palestinian people.
Professor Kelsey says there are a number of very relevant questions that are being ignored by the forum.
Ends: text 347 words
ENDS

Next in New Zealand politics

KiwiBuy the only answer to the housing shortage
By: Salvation Army
Himalayan tahr control operation proceeding
By: New Zealand Government
Women deserve ‘game-changing’ breast cancer medicines
By: Breast Cancer Aotearoa Coalition
Animal welfare in rodeo practices report released
By: National Animal Welfare Advisory Committee
PM's Post-Cabinet Press Conference 15/10/18: Fuel, Leaks
By: Lyndon Hood
North & South alleges heinous crimes in our armed forces
By: Bauer Media
Activists fined for Lorde concert raise $12k for charity
By: RNZ
Steps to fix teacher shortage are welcome but...
By: NZEI
University lecture tackles housing crisis head-on
By: University of Auckland
Home ownership subsidies should be rejected
By: New Zealand Taxpayers' Union
Housing Accessibility and Human Rights
By: Fightback
Construction costs, rents, and rates rise
By: Statistics New Zealand
DOC releases Tahr Control Operational Plan
By: Department of Conservation
Unions prioritised over medicines funding
By: New Zealand National Party
Lack of funding “height of cruelty”
By: NZ Breast Cancer Foundation
View as: DESKTOP | MOBILEWe're in BETA! Send Feedback © Scoop Media