The chairman of the Life Sciences Network, William Rolleston, has questioned the independence of the new Sustainable
Council of New Zealand.
“The group brought forward the announcement of its agenda, just three weeks out from a general election, and after its
organic farmer chairman rushed home early from a trip to Europe – this must throw into question the independence of such
an organization,” he says.
The new pressure group, which is headed by Sir Peter Elworthy, has called for an extended moratorium because of concerns
over GE trade risks, effects of GMOs on the environment and regulatory issues.
The council says that New Zealand runs the risk of alienating European markets if the moratorium is lifted and GMOs are
released into the environment.
But Dr Rolleston says if the moratorium remains in place, New Zealand runs the risk of being dragged before the WTO for
having non-scientific trade barriers.
“It is not nearly as simple as the Sustainability Council makes out. There are huge trade risks involved in not lifting
the moratorium.”
Dr Rolleston also says that while the Council talks about the threat GE poses to the environment, the technology has
huge potential benefits for the environment.
“In the US the use of GE technology has seen a massive drop in the use of pesticide, an increase in no-till sustainable
agriculture, and increased yields which has enabled former agricultural land to be returned to wilderness.”
GE could be a valuable tool with which to help preserve New Zealand’s biodiversity, he says.
“We think the desired goal of sustainability is great. But we believe the best way to achieve this is the one advocated
by the Royal Commission: to proceed with caution.”
Maintaining the moratorium would mean terrible uncertainty for New Zealand. “It will mean uncertainty for scientists,
for developers and for industry,” Dr Rolleston says.
“The moratorium is political. It is a blunt instrument. It does not address the safety of the technology on a
case-by-case basis.”
The Royal Commission maintained that co-existence was possible in New Zealand but Dr Rolleston believes the country
needs to move on to a model of cooperation.
“There needs to be a choice in the range of farming systems for farmers. The moratorium does not maintain or increase
choice. It reduces it.”