10 January 2002
GE Free Food Logo Needed For New Zealand Quality Agricultural Produce.
As more New Zealand companies start to label their products GE Free in response to customer concerns both at home and
overseas, a NZ GE Free symbol internationally recognised has been suggested by major producers.
“Our government should acknowledge this growing demand instead of secretly supporting North American directives to do
away with GE and GM Free labels. New Zealand has been proud of its agricultural economy and it is time the government
helped our growing GE Free markets rather than continually trying to undermine them,” says Susie Lees of GE Free New
Zealand.
The response of some major supermarkets, to the recently introduced labelling regime, has been to try and support
shoppers by sourcing GE Free ingredients for their house brands. Other companies have started to label GE Free, such as
Tegel, their chicken products described as having been produced without the use of GE feeds.
“This is good news for consumers, at last companies are seeing the light and responding to consumer concerns, how long
will it take for our government to do the same? If there is uncertainty about the growing of GE crops, then how come
they are on our supermarket shelves and we are still being forced to eat them,” says Susie.
The aim to avoid GE foods continues in the UK, EU, Australia, Japan, China, New Zealand and elsewhere as people choose
to avoid GE foods because of the lack of full assurances of safety and adequate clinical trials, some countries even
refusing the import of transgenic crops.
The unethical production methods of patented GE crops are also a cause for concern and in many countries the public are
demanding to know where trial sites are grown. In New Zealand a shroud of secrecy surrounds GE trials, the public still
being denied information as to their whereabouts, recent last minute pre Christmas changes to the Resource Management
Act may also prevent all but immediate neighbours being informed and for any complaint being brought before the
Environment Court.