Media Release – for immediate release
Princes Street (University Branch) New Zealand Labour Party
Thursday 14 September, 2000.
Wider Debate Vital As Trade Treaty Nears
Labour’s commitment to trade liberalisation needs to be debated within the party before any free trade agreement with
Singapore is signed, says the party’s Princes Street (Auckland University) branch.
“We are very concerned by the parliamentary wing’s desire to push this agreement through without adequate discussion
within the Party. There is very little understanding of the implications of this agreement both within the party and the
electorate as a whole,” says branch Vice Chair Todd Bridgman.
“A free trade agreement with Singapore could be the most significant piece of legislation passed by this Government. We
do not accept the argument that because most trade with Singapore is already free, we need not be concerned about it.
The potential impact of the agreement on the services sector is as yet poorly understood.
“Trade Minister Jim Sutton has clearly expressed a desire for the Singapore agreement to be the precursor to a series of
free trade agreements with other Asian nations. We are yet to be convinced that these free trade agreements would be in
the interests of all New Zealanders.
“Once an international agreement is signed, it will bind not only this Government but future Governments. The Labour
Party needs to have that debate before it heads irreversibly down the path of trade liberalisation,” said Todd Bridgman.
Branch Chair Jordan Carter, focusing on the process that has been followed so far in this area, noted that “it is a
welcome change to see the Government prepared to disclose details of the proposed Treaty before it is signed, and
subjected to a vote in the House.
“This debate raises the larger issue of how future treaties should be entered into. Our view is that Cabinet’s power to
sign treaties is a hangover from the past, when Councillors advised the Monarch on foreign policy. We urge the
Government to consider requiring all treaties to be examined by the Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade select committee,
and then be approved by Parliament itself.
“International agreements come with conditions that are often not properly understood. By subjecting such agreements to
Parliamentary scrutiny, the Government could ensure that a wider debate is held, and that no mistakes are made, now or
in the future,” said Jordan Carter.
Todd Bridgman continued that “Labour was elected on a promise to change the free-market policies that have had such a
detrimental effect on New Zealand society since 1984. This Government has done exceedingly well because it has delivered
on these promises, as seen by its commitments to regional economic development, nation-building through the arts and the
‘Closing the Gaps’ initiative.
“We struggle to understand how an aggressive approach to free trade is consistent with these core policies. There
certainly seems to be a contradiction between Labour’s commitment to nation-building and its stance on globalisation.
“We are constantly being told of the economic benefits that will flow from trade liberalisation. The question that needs
to be asked is ‘how will those benefits be distributed, and are they big enough to be worth pursuing?’” concluded Todd
Bridgman.
ENDS
Contact: Todd Bridgman, Vice Chair
09 373 7599 extn 7216 (work)
09 520 2128 (evenings)
t.bridgman@auckland.ac.nz