INDEPENDENT NEWS

Bio-What? Is A Disappointing Report

Published: Thu 9 Mar 2000 04:18 PM
NEWS RELEASE: 9 MARCH 2000
BIO-WHAT? IS A DISAPPOINTING REPORT
The Ecologic Foundation is disappointed with today’s report of the Ministerial Advisory Committee on biodiversity protection on private land.
“Today’s ‘Bio-What?’ report has many good points, but its overall strategy just extends an approach which has not been working,” said Ecologic’s executive director Guy Salmon.
“There is a failure to confront the central issue, which is to specifically define what the property rights and obligations of landowners actually are.
“I fear the Minister for the Environment (Marian Hobbs) is fueling the debate over property rights, without having any real idea how she is going to resolve it.”
Spending a lot of money on scientific and planning studies which target bits of vegetation to protect would have an unintended side-effect, Mr Salmon said. It would create a large category of native forests, tussocklands and wetlands which are classified as being ‘not significant’ in terms of the Resource Management Act.
“That means that habitat destruction will continue, but public abhorrence of it will continue as well. This report fails to recognize that the overwhelming majority of New Zealanders simply don’t want the remaining area of native forest and wildlife habitats further reduced.”
Mr Salmon said a better approach would be based on the NZ Forests Accord, under which New Zealand’s more responsible forestry companies have pledged not to clear native forest at all, if it meets certain minimum specifications of area and composition.
“The real task is to extend that sort of approach so that it can cover the farming community, subdivision developers, and the less responsible forest companies that have so far not signed the Accord.
“Issues of biodiversity protection cannot, for practical reasons, be separated from other aspects of sustainable land management such as stream protection and erosion prevention.
“What we need is a clear specification of sustainable property rights which addresses all these issues, and that in turn should be linked to a sizeable programme of public assistance to help landowners come into practical compliance with their obligations,” Mr Salmon said.
Guy Salmon (025) 201 3033

Next in New Zealand politics

Gordon Campbell on Simon Bridges and political correctness
By: Gordon Campbell
Police Commissioner announces independent review
By: New Zealand Police
PM's Post-Cab: Now We Are Two
By: The Scoop Team
Revamp of guidelines for meth sentencing welcomed
By: NZ Bar Association
Armed police patrols will cause American-style shootings
By: People Against Prisons Aotearoa
Amnesty Int calls on Gov not to rush Terrorism Bill
By: Amnesty International
Funding to support Christchurch Call – Expert Reaction
By: Science Media Centre
Police told bullying victim to retract statement
By: RNZ
Zhang v R - New Sentencing Guidlelines
By: NZ Court of Appeal
Meth Dealers to be rewarded
By: Sensible Sentencing Trust
Police trial new response to high risk events
By: New Zealand Government
Police to pilot Armed Response Teams
By: New Zealand Police
The Nation: Simon Shepherd Interviews Golriz Ghahraman
By: The Nation
Keeping NZ safer with better counter-terrorism laws
By: New Zealand Government
Govt must sit down with National over Terrorism Suppression
By: New Zealand National Party
View as: DESKTOP | MOBILEWe're in BETA! Send Feedback © Scoop Media