INDEPENDENT NEWS

Anti-Avoidance And Fringe Benefit Tax Changes

Published: Thu 23 Dec 1999 11:49 AM
23 December 1999
ANTI-AVOIDANCE AND FRINGE BENEFIT TAX CHANGES TO BE CONSIDERED EARLY NEXT YEAR
Legislation increasing the tax rate on income over $60,000 to 39 percent and the fringe benefit tax rate from 49 percent to 64 percent will be followed up with further legislative changes early next year Minister of Finance and Revenue Michael Cullen said today.
The Government will be considering a bill to lower the tax on fringe benefits provided to low income earners. It will also consider measures to prevent high income earners avoiding the effect of tax increases.
Fringe Benefits
"The increase in the fringe benefit tax rate is necessary to prevent high-income earners avoiding the higher tax rate by substituting fringe benefits such as expensive cars and low interest loans for taxable salaries.
"About 70 percent of fringe benefits are in the form of an employer-provided car. It is absolutely appropriate that a large company pays fringe benefit tax at the high rate on the Mercedes Benz provided to its chief executive." Dr Cullen said.
"However, I am conscious that some fringe benefits are provided to lower-income earners. Because there is only one rate of tax on fringe benefits, the result can be unfair. This is a long-standing problem with the fringe benefit tax rules.
"The Government has instructed officials to look at this issue with a view to introducing legislation early next year to lower the tax rate on fringe benefits provided to lower-income employees.
"If viable solutions can be developed in time we hope to introduce the changes with effect from 1 April next year, when the change in the top personal tax rate comes into force."
Anti-avoidance Measures
There has been some comment in the media that high income earners will be able to avoid the increase in tax on their incomes by such means as diverting income through companies, trusts or superannuation schemes.
"Many of these dodgy schemes would not work under existing legislation," Dr Cullen said.
"They would fall foul of existing anti-avoidance law. I nevertheless recognise that some law changes may be necessary to ensure that the 33 percent rate on employer superannuation contributions applies only to genuine superannuation schemes.
"Also we need to look at possible legislation to prevent high income earners diverting income through companies or trusts. The Government will be looking at this early in the new year. This will allow time for appropriate consultation on any measures proposed."
In the meantime Dr Cullen cautioned people to think again before entering into dodgy schemes that inevitably will not work.
ENDS

Next in New Zealand politics

Government to end tenure review
By: New Zealand Government
A new future for work skills training in NZ
By: New Zealand Government
Progress Stalled in Reducing Inequality
By: Salvation Army
SSC to seek answers on IRD survey
By: New Zealand Government
Prohibiting smoking in vehicles carrying children for health
By: New Zealand Government
Nationwide events to commemorate Waitangi Day 2019
By: New Zealand Government
Change to how iconic high country land is managed
By: New Zealand Government
High Country farmers face more uncertainty, costs
By: New Zealand National Party
Forest & Bird welcomes end to tenure review
By: Forest And Bird
Fish and Game welcomes the halt to tenure reviews
By: NZ Fish and Game Council
EDS not convinced abandoning tenure review is a good thing
By: Environmental Defence Society
Purchase of unique North Otago reserve announced
By: New Zealand Government
Regions will suffer under centralisation of training
By: New Zealand National Party
SIT should not be merged
By: New Zealand National Party
Govt should privatise vocational education
By: ACT New Zealand
View as: DESKTOP | MOBILEWe're in BETA! Send Feedback © Scoop Media