Hon Stuart Nash
Minister of Fisheries
4 February 2019
The next phase of reform of the fisheries management system has been launched with a call for public input into new
rules for the commercial industry.
Fisheries Minister Stuart Nash has released a discussion document on proposed changes designed to improve commercial
“I have been told by tangata whenua, the commercial fishing industry, recreational fishing groups and environmental
organisations that they all want a better fisheries management system,” Mr Nash says.
“Some of the current rules for commercial fishing are complex, open to interpretation, offer few incentives to adopt
innovative practices, and may lead to lost economic value and wasted resources.
“We are asking for public feedback across four main areas of reform:
• amending the rules for what fish must be brought back to port and what fish can be returned to the sea. This includes
options to tighten the rules so fewer fish are returned to sea, or increasing flexibility so more fish can be returned;
• reviewing the offences and penalties regime to ensure it’s fair and effective;
• streamlining and updating the ministerial decision-making process for setting catch limits; and
• technical changes to the Fisheries Act.
“I would like to hear a wide range of views. Fisheries New Zealand officials will travel the country to hold
consultation meetings across ten centres, from Whangarei to Invercargill. Submissions can be made via the website, or by
email or post. I anticipate decisions arising from this exercise will result in the development of new legislation later
“This new phase of fisheries management reform follows the introduction of electronic reporting of commercial catches
and of vessel positions to identify what fish are being caught and where. The first commercial vessels began electronic
reporting in 2017 and it is being further rolled out this year.
“I can also confirm I am committed to considering on-board cameras once these policy questions are addressed. Previous
regulations were unrealistic and were developed without adequate engagement. I expect to soon provide an update to
“There is a process to follow before on-board cameras can be considered and I need to first ensure the regulations are
practical to implement, the technology is operationally ready to go, the systems are in place, and the fisheries
management framework is clearly understood. Any proposal for on-board cameras would go through a public consultation
“The lessons from Australia, where it took 10 years to get 80 cameras in place, demonstrate that considerable time and
effort should be invested in getting it right before the cameras are rolled out.
“Our fisheries management regime is underpinned by the Quota Management System (QMS) which has been in place for thirty
years and is not affected by these proposed changes. But we are always looking for ways to improve the management of our
fisheries. We want commercial fishing practice to align with our goals of sustainability. We also want to encourage
innovation and new technology and to promote premium fisheries products as part of New Zealand’s global brand.
“The rules being discussed in today’s document set the framework for the next steps in fisheries management reform. They
are designed to encourage a culture change so that every fish is valued by the commercial industry. This needs to be
driven by clear and easily understood rules that further incentivise the industry to adopt good fishing practices. That
will require the industry to be more accountable, maximise the value of the catch, report accurately, and verify what is
caught,” Mr Nash said.
The discussion document and information about the public meetings and how to make a submission can be found here: www.fisheries.govt.nz/haveyoursay
. Consultation is open until 17 March 2019.
Background: Frequently Asked Questions
1. Why are you proposing to change rules for landing and return of fish to the sea?
We’re looking to simplify the rules in commercial fisheries around what fish must be landed and what can be returned to
the sea, and ensure that these rules incentivise good fishing practice.
In some places, the commercial fishing rules are unclear, hard to understand and can be open to interpretation. This can
contribute to catches not being accurately reported or accounted for.
For example, some commonly caught fish have minimum legal sizes, while others do not, and some fish can be legally
returned to the sea regardless of size. For commercially caught fish which do have a minimum legal size, all undersize
fish are currently required to be returned to the sea, alive or dead.
The current rules also provide few incentives to fishers to avoid catching small or low value fish, because many fish
can be legally returned to the sea. As a result, the rules do not effectively incentivise good fishing practice, or
innovation in more selective fishing methods and practices.
2. What’s the problem with being able to return a large range of fish to the sea?
Many of these fish may not be currently reported, so the number of fish being returned to the sea is difficult to
quantify. This information is an important factor when making fisheries management decisions, such as setting catch
limits for a fish stock. We need reliable and more complete information on catches to support better fisheries
3. How could commercial vessels avoid catching small or unwanted fish?
We want to ensure that all fish caught under the QMS are accounted for. We know that given the right incentives, the
industry can reduce the number of small or unwanted fish they catch by changing their fishing practices, such as
modifying fishing gear setup, fishing at different times, or in different places.
4. Why aren’t you proposing changes to minimum sizes for recreational fishing?
Recreational fishing methods by and large have a relatively low impact on the marine environment. Individuals are often
able to return undersized fish to the sea unharmed.
While the survival chances of released fish will depend on the method used to catch the fish, the depth at which they
are caught and how they are handled before release, individuals largely have a choice over which fish to take home and
which to return to the sea.
A recreational minimum legal size limit, in combination with a daily bag limit, is the most effective and sustainable
way to control a recreational catch allowance.
5. Why do you want to introduce new offences and penalties?
Fisheries offending has historically been hard to detect because it typically occurs out at sea, well away from the
public eye. As a result we have strong penalties in place for when it is detected.
The introduction of electronic catch and position reporting will increase the likelihood that breaches of commercial
fishing rules are detected. As a result, we need to ensure flexible penalties are available and that we can respond in a
commensurate way to the level of offending.
Having a graduated range of offences and penalties based on the number of fish and how often breaches are made would
offer a more balanced regime. It would also encourage good fishing practices if authorities had the ability to issue
infringements for low-level offences.