INDEPENDENT NEWS

Hipkins uses role to avoid Education Bill scrutiny

Published: Tue 11 Sep 2018 11:52 AM
It appears Chris Hipkins is taking advantage of his role of Leader of the House to avoid scrutiny in his Education portfolio, National’s spokesperson for Education Nikki Kaye says.
“Leader of the House Chris Hipkins has engineered a situation which will see two education bills debated in the House at a time when committee members are obligated to attend Education and Workforce select committee hearings in Auckland.
“It is a sad day for Parliament when the Leader of the House uses his role to reduce scrutiny in his role as Education Minister. What’s worse is that these bills cover contentious issues such as the removal of partnership schools, National Standards and a bill replacing the Teachers Council.
“Speaker of the House Trevor Mallard criticised the process used to rush through the Education Amendment Bill this week when he spoke about the orchestrated clash and said ‘I do not think it is good practice for that to occur’.
“The select committee also applied for extensions to the process to account for late amendments by the Minister regarding partnership schools. However, Chris Hipkins blocked this extension and Government committee members forced a meeting.
“We acknowledge the courage of NZ First to support National letter to the Business Committee raising concerns about inadequate time for this Bill.
“Chris Hipkins has also come under increasing pressure from respected leaders such as Sir Toby Curtis and Lance O’Sullivan who urge him to listen regarding partnership schools.
“This is a Minister who from the outset has engaged in disrespectful parliamentary behaviour and has opened the Crown up to legal risk by terminating partnership schools prematurely and without contract termination, made late amendments to the legislation regarding schools without giving them adequate time to comment, refused to acknowledge the Waitangi Tribunal claim by iwi leaders despite legal papers being served months ago and was forced to correct Parliamentary answers admitting the Crown’s error.
“The Minister should remove provisions relating to partnership schools in the Education Amendment Bill until the Crown has met with iwi leaders to work through the Waitangi Tribunal claim. The members of the Education and Workforce Committee on both sides of the House deserve the opportunity to be in the Parliament for the full debate on the Bill.
“At the very least there should be an opportunity for all members of the select committee to speak on this legislation. The fact that there isn’t shows a disregard for these schools, their students and basic parliamentary processes.”

Next in New Zealand politics

Top academics call on government to take climate action
By: UNITEC
New plan for high quality early learning
By: New Zealand Government
Two years’ progress since the Kaikoura earthquake
By: Marlborough District Council
Pike River Mine Drift re-entry plan to proceed
By: New Zealand Government
New High Commissioner to Australia announced
By: New Zealand Government
Dame Silvia Cartwright to lead public inquiry into EQC
By: New Zealand Government
Water rationing in Hawke's Bay as some rivers run dry
By: RNZ
PM pretends climate change isn’t a global issue
By: ACT New Zealand
Minister's Door Closed on Waste-to-Energy Plants
By: Social Credit
Questions remain over Government’s ECE plan
By: New Zealand National Party
Concerned education unions consider joint action
By: NZEI
Education unions' combined executives to meet
By: NZEI
Ministry of Education offers $10,000 to most teachers
By: Ministry of Education
Kaikōura property owners in limbo two years after quake
By: RNZ
Earthquake scenario to practise emergency response
By: Greater Wellington Regional Council
View as: DESKTOP | MOBILEWe're in BETA! Send Feedback © Scoop Media