Gerry Brownlee MP
National Party State Services Spokesman
21 December 2007
Plenty of victims in Labour attack on neutrality
National Party State Services spokesman Gerry Brownlee says he deeply regrets that Labour has chosen to make scapegoats
of officials and others in its attempts to cover up the pressure it is applying to supposedly neutral departments.
“Clare Curran, Madeleine Setchell, Hugh Logan, Mark Prebble, Neal Cave – all these names have been linked to the series
of scandals that have descended on the Environment Ministry.
“Of course, none of them would have had their names brought to public attention had it not been for Ministerial
interference.
“First it was David Benson-Pope, then it was David Parker and most recently it has been Trevor Mallard. Only Mr
Benson-Pope has faced any sanction from Helen Clark.”
Mr Brownlee says he remains staggered that State Services Commissioner Mark Prebble could conclude there was no
inappropriate interference by the Minister David Parker in the appointment of a Labour Party activist in a key
communications role.
“Clare Curran declared no conflict of interest, yet was described as David Parker’s ‘right hand woman’ and had worked
for him in a political capacity. Meanwhile, Madeleine Setchell was sacked when a Minister learnt of her ‘perceived’
conflict. Helen Clark went as far as to wrongly accuse Madeleine Setchell of failing to declare her conflict. In that
light, Dr Prebble’s verdict just doesn’t stack up.”
Mr Brownlee is also critical of Dr Prebble’s decision to sweep aside Trevor Mallard’s attack on whistleblower Erin
Leigh.
“Parliament was told just last week that details of the information provided to Mr Mallard would form part of the SSC
report. Justice Minister Annette King confirmed on December 6 that the State Services Commissioner believed Mr Mallard
was entitled to draw the conclusions he did in smearing the reputation of Erin Leigh. However, the information was
mysteriously missing from the SSC report.
“We had an expectation that an open examination would have allowed comparison between information provided to the
Minister and his extraordinary outburst in the House.
“I would have also thought that as a guardian of public service neutrality, Dr Prebble may have had something to say
about the chilling effect that sort of attack has on other public servants who might have had helpful information.”
Ends