Green Party victory on free speech and fairer elections
With the inclusion of changes negotiated by the Green Party, the Electoral Finance Bill tabled today should allay many
of the concerns raised by New Zealanders.
The Green Party had negotiated strongly with the Government for a number of changes to the Bill to ease the burden on
third parties so that there would be no breach of human rights or the right to expression, Green's Musterer (Whip)
Metiria Turei says.
"The 1986 Royal Commission quite correctly said that there was no point in limiting political party spending if other
campaign groups were not also limited. Wealthy supporters often drown out the campaigns of ordinary groups with
extensive advertising. Elections should be about issues - not about the size of wallets.
"Recent protests have been a little premature given the changes we have secured in the Bill. These changes have been
made precisely to protect the freedom of expression and ensure that secret campaigns of millions of dollars do not drown
out Kiwi groups and people with legitimate election issues.
"We believe the original Bill, as introduced by the Government, severely restricted the spending of third parties in the
campaign and imposed greater burdens on them than political parties. Anonymous donations to third parties were banned
but not those to political parties.
"The Greens negotiated a change to that. Under the amended Bill, political parties will also be severely restricted in
the value of anonymous donations that they can receive - no more than $240,000 over a whole election period (3 years).
The legislation as it stood at the last election allowed for unlimited anonymous donations and during that three-year
period before the last election Labour reportedly received $400,000 anonymously and National more than $2 million.
"We negotiated an increase of the maximum third party spending cap from $60,000 to $120,000 and made sure that ordinary
kiwis could deliver pamphlets, advertise in local community newspapers and undertake other general electioneering
activity without being caught by the legislation.
"We have also protected the donations community and advocacy groups receive, which are intended for their ordinary work
and not for electioneering. Before our changes the bill caught virtually every donation to a third party and that was
simply ridiculous," Mrs Turei says.
ENDS