INDEPENDENT NEWS

Bradford dismisses bid to undermine S59 repeal

Published: Fri 2 Mar 2007 04:54 PM
2 March 2007
Bradford dismisses Copeland bid to undermine S59 repeal
Green Party MP Sue Bradford dismissed as "ridiculous" and "wilfully misguided" the attempt today by United Future MP Gordon Copeland to sabotage her bill to repeal S59 of the Crimes Act, calling it "a desperate last throw of the dice, based on flawed legal reasoning".
"The example given in the legal opinion is of a child being placed on a naughty mat. Let us be clear about this. Parents who put children on a naughty mat are not going to be prosecuted or criminalized," Ms Bradford says.
"My bill, as amended in select committee, explicitly states that parents can use reasonable force on several grounds, including 'preventing the child from engaging or continuing to engage in offensive or disruptive behaviour, or 'performing the normal daily tasks that are incidental to good care and parenting'.
"Assaulting a child is already illegal. I am taking action, with the support of many MPs from right across Parliament and the support of the wider community, to remove a defence that has seen some parents get away with severely beating their children.
"I am pleased that the police will continue to investigate complaints of assault against children. Unlike Mr Copeland, I am encouraged by the expertise that the Police have developed in handling sensitive issues of domestic violence, and feel reasonably confident they have the ability to differentiate between false and real complaints.
"I would not like to live in a society where abuse complaints against children went un-investigated. Unlike Mr Copeland and his legal advisor, I don't believe we should shrink from investigating abuse complaints just because parents may be at loggerheads, or because children's views may initially be at variance with adults.
"Gordon Copeland's legal adviser Peter McKenzie QC, is no stranger to conservative moral crusades, having represented the Society for the Promotion of Community Standards in its campaign against the film Baise-Moi and in its attempts to get anti-gay videos into schools, and other groups like the anti-abortion campaigners Right to Life.
"I prefer the expert legal consideration given to my bill during the select committee process by the Law Commission experts, that included Sir Geoffrey Palmer."
ENDS

Next in New Zealand politics

Government to end tenure review
By: New Zealand Government
A new future for work skills training in NZ
By: New Zealand Government
Progress Stalled in Reducing Inequality
By: Salvation Army
SSC to seek answers on IRD survey
By: New Zealand Government
Prohibiting smoking in vehicles carrying children for health
By: New Zealand Government
Nationwide events to commemorate Waitangi Day 2019
By: New Zealand Government
Change to how iconic high country land is managed
By: New Zealand Government
High Country farmers face more uncertainty, costs
By: New Zealand National Party
Forest & Bird welcomes end to tenure review
By: Forest And Bird
Fish and Game welcomes the halt to tenure reviews
By: NZ Fish and Game Council
EDS not convinced abandoning tenure review is a good thing
By: Environmental Defence Society
Purchase of unique North Otago reserve announced
By: New Zealand Government
Regions will suffer under centralisation of training
By: New Zealand National Party
SIT should not be merged
By: New Zealand National Party
Govt should privatise vocational education
By: ACT New Zealand
View as: DESKTOP | MOBILEWe're in BETA! Send Feedback © Scoop Media