INDEPENDENT NEWS

Are we really 39% sicker?

Published: Tue 16 May 2006 12:56 AM
Paula Bennett MP National Party Associate Industrial Relations Spokeswoman
16 May 2006
Are we really 39% sicker?
National Party Associate Industrial Relations spokeswoman Paula Bennett is calling on Labour to deny that a 39% increase in sick leave for some industries is a direct result of its clumsy Holidays Act changes.
"Employer statements that it is costing more than $17 million in wage-bill blowouts are an inevitable consequence of a poorly designed policy that provides for relevant daily pay, including bonuses and overtime, even when an employee is sick.
"One union has told the Otago Daily Times they do not 'blame some of these people for taking a couple of days off'.
"Employers don't have a problem if people take a couple of days off through genuine illness, but even Labour must start to question a 39% increase for some industries.
"Of course it is the employer that directly picks up the tab, but in the long run it's the economy that suffers, as businesses are forced to pay for non-productive staff who aren't turning up for work.
"Salary and wage earners should rightly expect to be rewarded for their efforts with a fair pay packet, and get reasonable time off when necessary.
"But the unions should be very careful about defending what amounts to a rort of Labour's loose employment laws," says Ms Bennett.
ENDS

Next in New Zealand politics

Die In for Palestine Marks ANZAC day
By: Peace Action Wellington
Penny Drops – But What About Seymour And Peters?
By: New Zealand Labour Party
PM Announces Changes To Portfolios
By: New Zealand Government
Just 1 In 6 Oppose ‘Three Strikes’ - Poll
By: Family First New Zealand
Budget Blunder Shows Nicola Willis Could Cut Recovery Funding
By: New Zealand Labour Party
Urgent Changes To System Through First RMA Amendment Bill
By: New Zealand Government
View as: DESKTOP | MOBILE © Scoop Media