Stephen Franks
Tuesday, 21 June 2005
Press Releases - Treaty of Waitangi & Maori Affairs
ACT Maori Affairs spokesman Stephen Franks today offered a checklist of questions for journalists considering NZ First's
treaty policy claims.
" Mr Peters is plausible, just like he was the last time he used this kind of rhetoric in an election campaign and then
conspired to do the opposite," Mr Franks said.
"In Opposition in 1989 and 1990 he promised an end to the grievance industry by 2000. Yet in 1999 he voted to kill an
ACT bill to set a time limit on receiving new claims and a final timetable for settling them. In Opposition in 1989 he
said he would reduce the Waitangi Tribunal to a research body. We know what happened.
"As Mr Bolger's Maori Affairs Minister he developed and trumpeted the hugely forgettable Ka Awatea devolution plan for
Maori separatism. Get the flavour from some Maori applause for its disappearance. Ross Himona said, 'We don't need to
empower and enfund any more in-between agencies and units and commissions and pseudo-iwi and Maori politicians and
bureaucrats and Maori corporatists.'
"As Treasurer from 1996 to 1998 he was deeply complicit in the Labour/National consensus that protected the Treaty
grievance industry. He could have got the then government to reject the claims to rights never imagined in 1840, like
the radio spectrum and native plants and animals, but he did not.
"Instead he poured scorn on ACT's practical vow to put a stop to separatist and divisive race-based policies and funding
with a sunset date for the Treaty industry. He helped to vote Derek Quigley's bill down.
"In 2002 he discovered the ACT website. It took him some time to risk adopting my consistent position that the treaty
partnership was a mythical invention, but he joined ACT in asking the PM to define the spurious Treaty principles.
"Both the partnership and the principles were inventions. But until this election year he kept voting for law that
referred to them and other laws that entrenched the race privileges and rights he is now denouncing.
"He voted for at least four Treaty settlement bills before he at last joined ACT in voting no this year. In December
last year he voted for the outrageous deal that gave Maori a huge new chunk of aquaculture areas despite it having
nothing to do with the Treaty.
"In September 2004 he voted for the Maori Fisheries Act that stole the property rights of coastal iwi to hand out as
political koha to more numerous northern tribes.
"Nevertheless, Mr Peters could play a useful role in putting a stake through the heart of the Treaty vampire. He will be
reported when other MPs are self-censored by the media. But he should be pinned down himself. Ask him what he will do
about Maori television. Ask him whether he will promise to:
- End racial affirmative action. For every beneficiary of "affirmative action" there is a "loser" of preferment on
merit.
- Oppose nepotism and appointments not transparently on merit.
- Support kura kaupapa as the right of parents to choose schools that will maintain cultural traditions in their
children.
- Repeal the RMA breaches of the Article 2 guarantee of property rights - that is the property owner's right to do as
he or she wishes within their own property.
- Ensure that wananga and other publicly funded bodies are all held to the same high standards of probity and financial
accountability.
- End the racist privilege of rate exemptions on Maori property.
- End all laws that permit government discrimination against any New Zealander on the basis of race, colour, ethnicity
or national origin.
- Restore the separation of church and state, prohibiting state support for cultural and spiritual values (including
Maori values).
- Repeal so called human rights laws that interfere with positive discrimination by individuals and protect their
rights to associate, or not, with whoever they like, free to express their cultures and beliefs.
- Ban so called partnerships and guardianships with central and local government agencies that subvert one-person one
vote democracy.
- Abolish all racial political privileges including RMA iwi consultation, and official appointments for reasons other
than ability to do the job?
"If he is committed we will welcome his support for ACT's 10-year campaign for a colour-blind government.
"We could seek with him a nation of tolerant people who feel they are New Zealanders first and foremost, free but not
obliged to show pride in our individual cultural heritages and the diversity of our fellow citizens," Mr Franks said.
ENDS