Budget 2005 Hon Dr Michael Cullen Speech:
Speech notes for Appropriation (2005/06 Estimates) Bill, delivered 19 May 2005 to Parliament
Madam Speaker,
I move, that the Appropriation (2005/06 Estimates) Bill be now read a second time.
Budget 2005 is about securing the future. Securing the future for the nation as a whole and securing the future for New
Zealand families and New Zealanders individually.
The major features are:
the creation of KiwiSaver, a new work-based savings scheme
major changes to taxation, in particular tax cuts to encourage investment and savings and to assist small business, in
part paid for by the new carbon charge
significant additional spending to promote increased opportunities, particularly through education
large increases in spending to enhance security, through health spending, additional Police staff, a long-term defence
spending plan, funding for Working for Families and the Rates Rebates scheme and
further increases in spending to support economic growth.
The unifying theme connecting these elements is the fact that they are focussed on improving the long-term economic and
social health of New Zealand.
Madam Speaker,
Over the last five years New Zealand has experienced a period of sustained economic growth. This has had major benefits.
The first has been significant employment and income growth. Between the March 2000 quarter and the March 2005 quarter
some 260,000 more people have found employment in net terms. Of these 218,000 are full-time and 42,000 part-time. This
predominance of full-time job growth within the total picture contrasts markedly with the experience of the previous ten
years.
Income growth has also been strong. Real per capita incomes have risen 11 per cent since the March 2000 quarter. New
Zealand’s relative slide in relation to the OECD average has ceased and begun to reverse. But there is still a long way
to go before we can claim to be back in the top half of the OECD in that respect.
The second benefit has been that prudent fiscal management has led to a significant lowering of the debt to GDP ratios
while enabling the rapid build up of assets in the New Zealand Superannuation Fund. As a nation, we are far better
placed to deal with the fiscal challenges of the coming demographic transition than we were five years ago.
In this respect, we are not merely in the top half of the OECD but in the top handful of countries. Provided we remain
prudent and sensible, and avoid unnecessary politically driven bidding wars, this will stand us in excellent stead over
the next generation as many other rich nations struggle with high debt and unsustainable policies.
Gross sovereign-issued debt has fallen from 35 per cent of GDP in June 1999 to an estimated 22.6 per cent at the end of
June this year. Alongside this, accumulated assets in the New Zealand Superannuation Fund will stand at around $6.5
billion.
The New Zealand Government will, for the first time ever, move into a net positive financial asset position in 2006/07.
Despite this, the third benefit has been to allow for significant increases in investment in health and education,
providing for lower primary healthcare costs, more surgical procedures, more modest tertiary fees, and a less onerous
student loans system. Along with this have gone rises in the level of New Zealand Superannuation after the cut of 1999
and the first stages of the Working for Families package, which is lifting substantially the incomes of hundreds of
thousands of low to middle income families.
Madam Speaker,
It is the Labour-Progressive Government’s determination to maintain these gains into the long term while dealing with a
new range of challenges and opportunities which have come to the fore over the last few years.
The expectation is that the economy will slow over the next two years to an annual growth rate of about 2½ per cent.
This will be due to a combination of the effects of capacity constraints, slowing net migration, the dampening impact of
higher interest rates on spending and a difficult external trading environment created, in particular, by the strong New
Zealand dollar.
The capacity constraints have led to the tightening of monetary policy as the Reserve Bank seeks to dampen inflationary
pressures. This has had the effect of placing further pressure on an already strong New Zealand dollar, thus
contributing to widening the current account deficit.
The primary reason for the strong Kiwi is, of course, the weak greenback. Large current account deficits in the United
States in combination with large and seemingly uncontrolled fiscal deficits have caused that. For the second time in 25
years the United States has proved that tax cuts are not self-funding. If unaccompanied by expenditure cuts they simply
lead to burgeoning deficits and debt. There is a lesson for all of us in this.
Certainly this experience, and the tight capacity constraints in New Zealand, militate against large scale fiscal
expansion, whether by revenue reduction or larger expenditure increases than those planned in this budget. That is
particularly so if such reductions or increases are structural in nature and therefore continue to resonate through the
long-term fiscal forecasts. As always, too much jam now is likely to lead to only crumbs later.
These facts are emphasised by the fiscal and economic forecasts. The current account deficit is forecast to stay well
above 6 per cent of GDP over the next four years, though starting to contract towards the end of the period.
The fiscal position remains strong and gross debt is forecast to move to about 20 per cent of GDP by the end of the
forecast period. But then it remains around that figure over the ten year projection period beyond that.
The fiscal surpluses remain strong in the immediate term. The cash surplus for the current year is forecast to be $2.4
billion. This reduces to a cash surplus of $30 million for 2005/06 but changes to an average cash deficit for the
following three years of about $1.9 billion a year.
In operating balance terms, this translates into an OBERAC of $7.4 billion or 4.9 per cent of GDP this year, $6.7
billion or 4.3 per cent of GDP next year, and an average of $4.8 billion or 2.9 per cent of GDP in the following three
years.
While in nominal terms this still sounds large, it is just sufficient to fund the contributions to the New Zealand
Superannuation Fund and other capital needs without a trend increase in the gross debt to GDP ratio.
Moreover, this is subject to the assumption that the growth in expenditure during both the forecast and projection
periods will be significantly less than it has been in both Budget 2004 and Budget 2005.
The fully implemented effect of both budgets averages about $3.1 billion a year (GST exclusive). (Members should note
that all figures in Budget 2005 are GST exclusive for the first time as a result of the new Public Finance Act
provisions). Last year’s spend included over $1 billion alone on the Working for Families package. This year there are
substantial one-off effects in terms of tax cuts for the business sector and for savings and investment, as well as new
policies such as KiwiSaver.
The message of Budget 2005 is that such large one-off packages will be rare over the foreseeable future unless
accompanied by expenditure cuts or efficiency gains elsewhere within the state sector.
Over the next three budgets the allowance for new spending has been set at $1.9 billion a year, thereafter growing by
inflation.
The government is aware that to achieve these targets will require careful prioritisation. Already, I have warned
Ministers and Departments, and the public, to moderate expectations in terms of expenditure increases next year.
Madam Speaker,
As I indicated earlier, we are forecasting substantial current account deficits over the next four years. While a more
realistic level of the New Zealand dollar will eventually bring that deficit back to more comfortable levels, the fact
remains we have run significant current account deficits for nearly all our history as a nation.
That, and a range of other indices, point to a low level of household savings in New Zealand. We are left highly
dependent on foreign capital, which means a substantial proportion of our national income is reclaimed by foreigners as
theirs. Hence the fact that our Gross National Product is significantly less than our Gross Domestic Product.
New Zealanders often bemoan the consequences of low saving, such as high levels of foreign ownership. But, if we are to
own, literally, more of our future we must lift our level of savings.
Three areas are of particular interest: saving for retirement, saving for home ownership, and saving for the costs of
one’s children’s tertiary education.
In approaching how best to lift, over time, our national performance with respect to these the Labour-Progressive
Government is motivated by considerations of equity, simplicity, and practicality. In addition, the government wishes to
maintain a voluntary approach. Finally, we are determined not to swap the current situation of government saving and
private dissaving into one of government dissaving and private saving. In other words, the fiscal costs of any policy
initiatives have to be moderate.
Consideration was given to whether an integrated savings scheme, combining all three elements, was possible. In the end,
it is considered that, while it is possible to combine retirement saving and first home deposit saving, it is not
desirable to integrate savings for tertiary education.
Expressions of interest have been sought for a tertiary education savings scheme with broad design parameters.
With respect to retirement and first home deposit savings, the government has decided to begin with a broadly based
work-based savings scheme akin to that proposed by the group chaired by Peter Harris, which reported last year. While
many of the recommendations of the Harris committee have been amended in some detail, the essential features of the
proposal have survived intact.
The new KiwiSaver scheme is intended to begin operation on 1 April 2007.
KiwiSaver’s basic features are:
• automatic enrolment in a savings scheme at the workplace for new employees aged 18-65, with the ability to opt out
• an upfront contribution by the government on joining, plus low management fees
• a basic contribution rate of 4 per cent of income deducted through the tax system and
• minimum compliance costs for employee and employer.
Apart from automatic enrolment, employees may become KiwiSavers at any time.
The new employee can opt out by notifying IRD between weeks two and four after starting a new job. In this case IRD
notifies the employer, otherwise deductions begin the next pay day after eight weeks with a new employer.
Contributions will be at one of two levels. The standard rate will be set at 4 per cent of income, but the employee can
opt for a higher deduction rate of 8 per cent.
The government will support KiwiSavers in three ways.
Firstly, it will meet the costs of the administration through IRD.
Secondly, a $1,000 upfront contribution will be provided to each new KiwiSaver. This contribution will be available to a
member of an existing registered superannuation scheme that fully converts to a KiwiSaver product.
Thirdly, the government will provide to savers in approved KiwiSaver products a fee subsidy at a capped level. This
level has yet to be finalised and will depend on consultation and negotiation with providers.
Normally, a KiwiSaver will have full access to their funds at age 65 or after five years in KiwiSaver, whichever is the
later. Hardship provisions allowing withdrawal are being developed and permanent emigration will also trigger the
ability to withdraw.
A KiwiSaver can elect to take a contribution holiday for up to five years, with contributions resuming unless a further
option to suspend is exercised.
The self-employed will be able to become KiwiSavers, selecting their own contribution rate and frequency of
contributions.
Employers will be able to make contributions on behalf of their KiwiSaver employees via Inland Revenue. This means they
can be made at the same time as employee contributions with minimum compliance costs. The actual rate of employer
contribution will be a matter of negotiation between employer and employee.
Employers will also be able to apply to the Government Actuary for an exemption to the automatic enrolment provisions if
they have a work-based superannuation scheme which meets a set of defined conditions.
There will be two types of KiwiSaver providers: default providers and other qualifying providers. All qualifying
providers will need to meet a set of minimum criteria.
If an employee does not pick a provider, he or she will be randomly allocated to a default provider. In addition to
having to meet the standard criteria, default providers will be selected through a competitive tender process designed
in part to negotiate lower fees.
IRD will hold initial contributions for eight weeks to allow time for the contributors to choose a provider. Small
balances will also be held until they accumulate to a minimum level to avoid costs to the providers. In both cases
interest at the IRD’s use of money interest rate will be paid on the balances.
The operating costs of KiwiSaver, including an education campaign to improve financial literacy, are estimated at $90
million in 2006/07, $280 million in 2007/08, $143 million in 2008/09 and $154 million in 2009/10. This is based on an
assumption that the number of KiwiSavers will be around 265,000 by 1 July 2008 and around 415,000 by 1 July 2010.
KiwiSaver will be linked to a new scheme to assist modest to middle-income families with the deposit for a first home.
Those who are KiwiSavers for a minimum of three years will qualify for an additional subsidy of $1,000 a year up to a
maximum of five years at the time of purchase of their first home. They will be able to draw down all of their
accumulated savings as KiwiSavers except for the initial $1,000 upfront contribution. There will be conditions in
relation to the total household income of the applicants and the value of the house being purchased.
The housing deposit subsidy will also be available to members of registered superannuation schemes if their employer is
exempt from the automatic enrolment provisions or if their scheme converts to a KiwiSaver product. Preliminary estimates
are that around 3,000 households a year will take advantage of this opportunity. The estimated annual cost is up to $35
million.
Other measures to support home ownership include expanding the Mortgage Insurance Scheme introduced in 2003. Lenders
other than Kiwibank will be able to participate. The eligibility caps on income will be increased by $20,000 a year. By
2008/09 the Scheme is estimated to cost $22 million a year and the volume of loans covered is expected to rise from less
than 1,000 a year at present to some 5,000 loans a year.
The government will also fund a new home ownership education programme.
The Minister of Housing will announce further details of these first home purchase initiatives today.
Madam Speaker,
The New Zealand Superannuation Fund, KiwiSaver, the encouragement for home ownership, and the proposed tertiary
education savings scheme are all part of the effort to lift our national savings rate.
The nature of the taxation on savings and investment also has a role to play in this respect. The government does not
support large-scale tax incentives to support savings. These are of dubious value and efficacy.
But the current tax regime for investments is very complex and can lead to perverse incentives. It overtaxes those on
the lower statutory rate of tax, tends to advantage certain forms of offshore investment, and distinguishes between
various destinations for that investment. Equally, any attempt at reform is likely to have controversial elements.
The changes I am foreshadowing this afternoon are designed to remove disincentives to save and invest, remove elements
of overtaxation, and lead to an outcome where investment is guided more by the returns on the investment than by the tax
opportunities presented.
With respect to the taxation of domestic investment two major changes will be legislated for. Under the first, New
Zealand-based collective investment vehicles will no longer be required to be taxed as entities. Rather they will be
able to elect to have the income earned by a fund regularly attributed to the individuals investing in it and taxed at
their marginal statutory rates.
As with the current regime for taxation on interest-bearing accounts, the investor will advise the fund of their
marginal rate. When income is earned, it will be credited to the account of the individual and the fund will withhold
tax from it at that marginal rate. This will be a final withholding tax so no tax return will be required. Equivalence
to the tax regime on interest and direct investment of shares will be achieved. And, as it is a final withholding tax,
the investment income will have no impact on family assistance, child support or student loan repayments.
For those collective investment vehicles which elect into the new rules the overtaxation on those earning under $38,000
a year is removed.
The estimated cost of this tax cut is $25 million.
At this stage the new rules are not compulsory, recognising that some collective investment vehicles would find it hard
to adopt the look-through rules. However, as the new elective rules bed in this issue will be kept under review.
Under the new elective rules some taxpayers on the 39 cent marginal rate could pay more, depending on how their
financial affairs are arranged. But for many this will be more than offset by the second change to the taxation rules on
New Zealand domestic investment.
This involves the removal of the taxation on the gains made on the sale of domestic shares by collective investment
vehicles.
The estimated cost of this tax cut is about $100 million a year.
Reform of the taxation of offshore investment is more difficult. Under current rules, offshore share investment is taxed
differently depending on the country in which the investment is made. If direct investment is in what is called a “grey
list” country, it is excluded from the foreign investment fund rules. If it is not, then foreign investment fund rules
which tax accrued capital gains apply. The rules contain four methods for calculating investment for a foreign
investment fund.
Consideration was given for some time to the use of a version of the risk-free rate of return method with respect to
overseas investment by New Zealanders.
In the end this has not been adopted. The main issue is the complexity involved in applying such a mechanism.
The method is conceptually simple but quickly becomes complex in application, particularly for individual investors
where investments are made at different points in a year.
Moreover, the fundamental perception problem remains with respect to tax being applied even where losses had been
incurred.
Instead, it is proposed to issue a discussion document within the next few weeks proposing to apply an income
calculation method based on actual changes in value for investment funds, companies and individual investors.
Under the proposal, the grey list will be abolished for portfolio share investment. Collective investment vehicles will
be taxed on the basis of the change in their accrued value. This would make for clearer rules, but in practical terms
the results should be similar to the law as it currently applies for funds that are in the business of actively trading
shares.
For individual and other investors it is even more difficult to find an approach that is reasonable without favouring
direct offshore investment over investing in a fund. The approach being proposed is that individual and other investors
will also be taxed on the change in value of their overseas shares, but with an annual cap so that tax is spread over a
number of years to better reflect cash flow. The discussion document will propose a threshold so that those with small
holdings of foreign shares continue to be taxed just on dividends received.
This will lead to accusations of extending the capital gains tax regime at present implicit in taxation on non-grey list
investment. It is clear, however, that any reform of the current regime that does not penalise investment into New
Zealand shares will lead to some such outcome.
The choice then is between a complex regime which tends to favour investment going offshore or a simpler regime which is
more favourable to investment in New Zealand.
It is proposed that the new tax rules on investment come into force on 1 April 2007.
In Budget 2004, I announced that the government was reviewing the tax depreciation rules to see if there were ways of
reducing tax biases within the rules and to resolve practical problems with their operation. The first series of changes
resulting from that review have been introduced in a bill which is now before Parliament. I am announcing the second set
of proposed changes today.
Tax depreciation rates will be changed to reflect better how assets decline in value. Current rates are likely to
penalise investment in short-lived plant and equipment, which can create tax biases that distort the structure of
capital investment away from the best investment opportunities. To deal with these biases, depreciation rates for
short-lived plant and equipment will increase and depreciation rates on buildings will reduce.
The method for calculating tax depreciation rates has been revised. From the 2005/06 income year tax depreciation rates
will be worked out in one of two ways. For buildings the straight-line basis will be applied over their economic lives
to determine their depreciation rate, and a diminishing value equivalent of this straight line rate will also be
available. For plant and equipment the double declining balance method will apply. This means, for example, an asset
with a ten year economic life can be written off at a rate of 20 per cent diminishing value.
For equipment such as laptop computers the changes will result in a 25 per cent increase in the allowable annual
depreciation deduction, from 48 per cent to 60 per cent a year.
More neutral tax depreciation rules will mean that businesses have incentives to invest in assets that provide the best
commercial returns. The changes will help businesses make better decisions about capital investments.
Secondly, to reduce some of the compliance costs to business from having to maintain fixed asset registers, the
low-value asset threshold will rise from $200 to $500. This change should reduce the number of assets that a business
must annually account for and will reduce the number of tax adjustments that it must make when the asset is sold.
The new depreciation rules will apply to plant and equipment purchased on or after 1 April 2005 and to buildings
purchased from today.
The increase to the low-value asset write-off threshold takes effect from purchases made after today.
Budget 2005 also contains a number of tax measures to improve New Zealand’s access to worldwide labour, skills, and
capital.
The first of these will reduce tax costs related to international recruitment to New Zealand. A temporary tax exemption
of five years on foreign income will be made available to people who come to work here, whether they are foreigners or
New Zealanders who have been non-resident for tax purposes for ten years. People who are not in employment will receive
the same exemption for three years.
Tax on offshore income is an important issue for highly skilled people who are in demand internationally and for the
businesses that recruit them from overseas. The new exemption will thus remove a tax barrier to New Zealand gaining the
skilled people it needs.
Updated tax rules for securities lending will make New Zealand more attractive for international investment. Existing
rules have acted as a barrier to the development of a securities lending market here. Qualifying transactions will now
be treated on their economic substance rather than legal form.
As I announced last week, Budget 2005 will also give companies that bring in new equity investors better access to tax
deductions for R expenditure. This will cater for the growth cycle of technology companies by allowing R deductions to be matched with income from that expenditure.
Proposals are also being developed to change the tax treatment of employee share options. The aim is to remove some of
the obstacles created by the tax system to businesses which offer share options to their employees. A paper setting out
proposals will be released for public consultation later this year.
I have already announced other major changes with respect to taxation. These related in particular to tax simplification
and reforms to Fringe Benefit Tax.
The simplification proposals involve the alignment of payment dates for provisional tax and GST, allowing businesses to
elect to base provisional tax payments on GST turnover, and a subsidy to payroll agents for meeting PAYE–related
compliance costs imposed on small employers.
These measures will lead to an ongoing cost of about $115 million a year.
With respect to Fringe Benefit Tax, the valuation rate for motor vehicles will be cut. Taxpayers will also be able to
elect to calculate motor vehicle FBT on a vehicle’s tax book value as an alternative to using the cost price.
At the same time, the thresholds applying to unclassified fringe benefits will be raised. In the case of an employer the
rise will be from $450 a quarter to $15,000 a year.
Similarly, the private use of employer owned or leased business tools will be exempted from FBT where provided primarily
for business purposes and where they cost less than $5,000 each.
Other changes include resolving problems with foreign superannuation schemes, removing unintended tax consequences from
unbundling payouts from cooperatives, and aligning the tax treatment of investments into foreign hybrid vehicles with
the treatment of investment into other foreign companies.
Finally, a discussion document will be released later this year on the tax treatment of limited partnerships.
This tax package, with its focus on savings and investment, has an estimated cost of $466 million in its first full
year. These are only part of the tax cuts incorporated into this year’s budget.
Consideration has also been given to changes in the personal tax system. As I have said many times, there is no evidence
our rates are especially high by international standards once a comparison is made including all taxes and compulsory
levies for social security and other purposes.
Moreover, even small changes in rates or thresholds have large revenue consequences. But in one area a strong case has
been made for change, not least by the United Future Party.
That is in relation to the movement of the three main personal tax thresholds to match inflation as is done with excise
duty on petrol, tobacco, and alcohol.
The Labour-Progressive Government, therefore, has decided to adjust the thresholds every three years. Because of the
complexity of personal tax changes compared with excise duty, annual changes were rejected. The gain to most individuals
would be very small in relation to the administrative costs.
Also, because tax threshold changes need to be announced well in advance of implementation there would be a very
significant lag between the last available CPI figure and the commencement of changes on the subsequent 1 April.
Therefore, it has been decided to adjust each three years by using the mid-point of the Reserve Bank’s Policy Targets
Agreement inflation band. This equates to a 6.12 per cent movement in the thresholds every three years.
This means that at the time of the first triennial adjustment, 1 April 2008, the $9,500 threshold will move to $10,081,
the $38,000 threshold to $40,324 and the $60,000 threshold to $63,672.
Taken together, all the tax cuts I have announced today will cost $229 million in 2005/06, $319 million in 2006/07, $535
million in 2007/08, and $776 million in 2008/09, or about $1.86 billion over the forecast period. Additionally, in
delaying provisional tax payment dates in 2007/08 to 2008/09 there is a delay of $760 million in tax revenues.
These revenue losses will be partially offset by the revenue from the new carbon charge which will come into effect on 1
April 2007. As already announced this will be set at $15 per tonne of CO2 equivalent. The gross revenue is estimated at
$528 million in the first full year but this will be offset by rebates which will reduce the estimated net annual income
to $322 million. Thus in the forecast period tax cuts of $1.86 billion will be offset by about $720 million of net
carbon charge revenue.
Madam Speaker,
KiwiSaver and the very significant changes to business and investment taxation contained in this year’s budget are a key
part of the government’s strategy to lift investment and make doing business easier.
Lifting our long-term rate of sustainable growth remains a key priority for action. Budget 2005 contributes further to
this key objective in a number of ways.
Further investment in the budget builds on the Growth and Innovation Framework. Over the forecast period the following
additional resources are being supplied:
• $31 million to increase the gains from international economic partnerships
• $49 million to implement the government’s digital strategy
• $72 million to increase support for business research and development
• $118 million to further increase capability in the public science system
• $24 million to strengthen the regulatory environment by providing additional funding to the Commerce Commission,
Securities Commission and the Takeovers Panel
• $9 million to boost New Zealand as a tourist destination and
• $45 million to expand Modern Apprenticeships and Industry Training and provide foundation learning, specifically
literacy and numeracy through the Industry Training Fund.
Infrastructure spending also receives a large boost in Budget 2005. All the increase in excise duty that came into force
on 1 April is going into the Land Transport Fund.
This means that the resources available to the Fund will rise from $1.54 billion in 2004/05 to $1.75 billion in 2005/06.
In addition, I am announcing today that in the three years to 30 June 2009, a further $100 million a year will be
provided to the National Land Transport Fund. This additional $300 million will enable planning to proceed for a higher
rate of roading construction than would otherwise have occurred.
This means the total available to the Land Transport Fund over the coming four years is over $8.4 billion.
Madam Speaker,
The largest amount of support this or any New Zealand Government gives to the business sector is through Vote Education.
Budget 2005 is marked by two key features in that respect. The first is substantial further investment in both basic and
high level skills. The second is determination to drive towards a higher level of quality and relevance in our
post-compulsory sector.
In this year’s budget we build on our commitment to deliver an education system that is founded on quality and
relevance, and aimed at lifting education standards across the board. Our investment reflects our determination to
increase participation in quality education, and to reduce the underachievement that characterises some sectors of New
Zealand.
We are increasing our investment in early childhood education by $152 million over four years, as we continue to deliver
on our commitment to make early childhood education more affordable, more accessible and of the best quality possible
for all New Zealand families.
Research shows intensive and regular quality early childhood education has long-term educational benefits, and our
government is determined to ensure these benefits are available to every single young New Zealander.
New Zealand’s schooling system is internationally respected. On average New Zealand students do very well by world
standards and our top students are amongst the best in the world.
The government is working with teachers to ensure good teachers are rewarded for their excellent work through higher
salaries, better conditions, professional development and clear career paths.
Our commitment to more and better paid teachers in our schools continues with a total investment of $1.43 billion since
Budget 2004. This includes $476 million in this year’s Budget for teacher pay settlements and $91.3 million to provide
an estimated extra 421 teachers (FTTEs) for secondary, area and middle schools.
This brings a total of 3,040 extra teachers (FTTEs) over and above those required for roll growth, based on the
recommendations of the School Staffing Review Group of 2001.
The government continues to adjust school operational funding each year.
Between 1999 and 2006 $241 million will have been added to schools’ operational funding. That is a nominal increase of
39.6 per cent over seven years, or almost 15 per cent over and above the level of inflation.
This budget also focuses on student outcomes and progress through the provision of high quality assessment tools and
professional development to help teachers and schools monitor their students’ progress.
We are investing $30.2 million over four years in ICT. Specifically another 20 ICT professional development clusters
will be added to the already 80 successful clusters throughout New Zealand. The rollout of laptops to every teacher in
New Zealand in a state or integrated school will be completed.
Developing an internet version of the Assessment Tools for Teaching and Learning (asTTle) means teachers and parents can
get more detailed and up-to-date information about children’s learning.
Special education funding has increased from $245 million in 1999 to $413 million in this budget.
Additional funding this year will provide for:
increasing the numbers of students eligible for Supplementary Learning Support from 1,000 to 1,500
increased funding for teacher aides and
more support for assessing learning needs.
The tertiary package announced today provides additional funding of $296.7 million over the next four years to support
the ongoing development of quality and relevant tertiary education.
In previous budgets, we have focused on putting in place the tertiary education system reforms. In Budget 2005 we are
consolidating this work by investing in improvements to the quality and relevance of teaching, learning and research in
New Zealand.
In addition to the industry training funding I have already referred to, the major areas of increase will be:
an additional $75.5 million over four years to increase the Performance-Based Research Fund
higher funding rates for technical and scientific subject areas including science, trades, technical subjects,
agriculture and horticulture
$57 million over four years for improved support for tertiary students, including increasing the medical trainee intern
grant by $10,000 a year and establishing a Bonded Merit Scholarship programme.
Madam Speaker,
If education lies at the heart of the government’s aspirations for opportunity, spending on health represents both
opportunity and security.
Budget 2005 commits additional resources to health which will total over $1.09 billion a year by 2008/09. A good part of
this reflects meeting in full the costs of maintaining real, population-adjusted spending for the health and disability
sector.
This year’s health package also provides for:
funding for the establishment of the Cancer Control Council
the roll out of the Primary Health Care Strategy to people aged 18-24, thus reducing first contact fees and
pharmaceutical co-payments
a standard national travel and accommodation policy for those who have high costs from travelling to treatment centres
further funding for the National Immunisation Register
the extension of free breast screening to women aged 45-49 and 65-69
the changes that come into effect on 1 July as the first large step on the way to abolishing asset testing for those
assessed as in need of older people’s long-term residential care
contributing towards the cost of the nurses’ pay settlement
increased funding for disability support and aged care services
funding the increased uptake of the Primary Health Care Strategy
continued progress on doubling the number of hip and major joint operations
increasing cataract interventions by 50 per cent
additional funding to continue the roll out of the Mental Health Blueprint and
a range of Progressive Party initiatives which have already been announced.
Much of this increase in funding will be spent on New Zealand’s senior citizens. They will also be the largest
beneficiaries from the changes to the Rates Rebates scheme already announced by the Prime Minister which will see over
150,000 superannuitant households benefit by up to $500 a year from 1 July 2006.
Madam Speaker,
Security has many aspects, from health to law and order to defence.
Since 1999, this government has placed great importance on making communities safer and helping people feel more secure
in their homes. To that end it has made proper resourcing of Police a priority.
The Police operational budget has increased substantially every year since 1999, with a consequential rise in Police
numbers and resources. This in turn has seen the crime rate reduce by 12.4 per cent between the calendar years 1999 and
2004, the Police resolution rate rise from 38.9 per cent to 44.6 per cent and the road toll fall to levels not seen
since the 1960s.
We will maintain this successful strategy for making our communities safer. The Police Vote will increase by $73.6
million to a record high of $1.03 billion.
The budget will provide for another around 245 sworn and non-sworn Police staff. For the first time in our history,
Police staff in New Zealand will number over 10,000.
The government will add $156.5 million in new baseline funding to the Ministry of Justice over the next four years. The
additional budget will ensure the Ministry is well equipped to manage its growing workload and deliver more effective
and efficient services to court users and the judiciary.
The increases follow a review of baseline funding which found the Ministry needed additional resources following several
years of significant reform work and change within the justice area.
From the middle of 2006 we will, for the first time since 1987, lift the limits on income and capital which allow access
to legal aid. Furthermore, the eligibility tests will be adjusted from time to time meaning that in future access to
legal aid will be protected from inflation.
The final key areas of security are border security and defence.
Over the next four years (2005-2009) the government will spend an additional $13.3 million on enhanced border and
security measures to improve the integrity of New Zealand’s borders and immigration systems, and protect New Zealand
staff overseas.
This enhanced border security will help protect New Zealand’s access to classified information from peer countries; and
contribute to fairer labour market conditions for New Zealand workers by ensuring wages and conditions are not undercut
by illegal workers.
The Defence Sustainability Initiative will provide an additional $4.6 billion over the next 10 years to restore and
develop the resources of the New Zealand Defence Force and the Ministry of Defence and will align long-term personnel
recruitment, training, development and resources with the Defence capital acquisition programme.
This long-term strategic funding initiative follows a systematic approach by this government to restore the capability
of our Defence Force, which was left to run down during the 1990s, resulting in ageing equipment and infrastructure and
personnel shortages.
Budget 2005 reflects the aims of the government's housing strategy, which promotes the importance of quality,
sustainable housing for all New Zealanders.
State housing is central to meeting the housing needs of those requiring direct assistance and will remain at the core
of government assistance. An additional $134 million over the next four years will be invested as we continue to build
our stock of state houses.
The Rural Housing, Healthy Housing and Community Renewal programmes will receive a further $33 million over the next
three years to continue their work of providing better and healthier homes in areas of greatest need.
Madam Speaker,
This year sees the continued roll-out of the Working for Families package, with over 260,000 low to middle income
families becoming eligible for targeted assistance. In addition we are seeing progress on a major reform of the benefit
system, with a drive towards a single core benefit and a more tailored service for beneficiaries.
An investment of $149 million over four years in this year's budget complements the aims of these key platforms of the
social development agenda.
To support the Working for Families package, programmes that give parents and children a better start will receive a $47
million boost.
To enhance the choices parents have to participate in the labour market, we will also invest $55 million over the next
four years in Out of School Care and Recreation, childcare and related initiatives. These initiatives will help to meet
the demands of a growing labour market, as well as boost the incomes of Kiwi families looking to build their stake in a
growing economy.
Filling the jobs in a growing economy is also a key focus of our welfare reforms. The reforms take place in a context of
record low unemployment and growing skill and labour shortages.
To provide opportunities for more people to enter the workforce an additional $47 million will be invested over the next
four years in work-focussed programmes for beneficiaries. This includes a focus on long-term unemployed and a new
service to support more sickness and invalids beneficiaries into work.
Madam Speaker,
New Zealanders responded magnificently to the needs of those affected by the Boxing Day tsunami. The government
responded in like manner.
The result was to see a temporary lift in our overseas aid budget to 0.27 per cent of Gross National Income.
Budget 2005 provides for the overseas aid allocation to increase by $59.4 million this coming year compared with Budget
2004’s initial estimates.
This will maintain spending at the 0.27 per cent level. It will be maintained at that level in 2006/07 and increased to
0.28 per cent in 2007/08.
This adds up to the most significant increases in overseas development assistance in recent decades. The primary focus
will be on our Pacific backyard where the developmental needs are very large. But bilateral programmes with Indonesia
and Vietnam will also be significantly strengthened.
Madam Speaker,
Individual ministers will be making a range of statements on specific initiatives which include too much detail to be
covered this afternoon.
As I said in introducing Budget 2005, its focus is on the long term, not the next four months or even the next four
years. That is shown by the key initiatives which:
lock in funding for New Zealand Superannuation
begin to address the task of lifting our savings rate as both individuals and a nation
introduce significant business tax cuts and structural changes to drive stronger investment
look to enhance our capacity to perform as good and responsible international citizens
accelerate further support for business development
strengthen our public health system
enhance the capacity and effectiveness of our education system and
support families in practical and effective ways rather than by mere rhetorical flourishes.
Madam Speaker,
Budget 2005 completes a second cycle of budgets that I have had the honour to present on behalf of two Labour-led
Governments. They have consciously been pragmatic documents designed to build a stronger fiscal position, lift economic
growth and increase social cohesion. On a base of stability and security, typified by the New Zealand Superannuation
Fund, we are building a nation we can be proud of.
We also seek to build a superstructure on that base of innovation and responsiveness to change which makes it exciting
to be a New Zealander.
We look to the future, both short and long term, with that pride and sense of excitement. We have achieved much in terms
of strong government finances, record low unemployment, and economic growth. But the building of a better future is by
definition, a task which is never completed.
We look forward with relish to continuing that never ending task.