3 September, 2003
Greens attack 'spineless' Gambling Bill
The Gambling Bill will do no more than scratch the surface of problem gambling in local communities - and in some cases
make it worse, said Green MP Sue Bradford today.
Ms Bradford, the Green Gambling spokesperson, has released official information indicating that the restrictions to be
imposed by the Gambling Bill will only affect 16 per cent of machines nationwide.
"When communities need the strength to combat the spiralling problem of gambling addiction, the Government's response is
spineless," said Ms Bradford.
"Not one territorial authority has the ability to control more than 30 per cent of pokies in their district. As councils
and community groups dealing with pokie addiction would agree, this is totally unacceptable.
"I call on local authorities to renew their campaign to convince this Government to support changes to the bill so that
local bodies can control all non-casino gambling machines, not just a small percentage of them."
Ms Bradford said local authorities should be very concerned that: * 19,306 gambling machines are in 1790
venues that councils won't be able to regulate. * 3665 gambling machines (16 per cent) are in 321 venues that
councils will be able to regulate. * 15 Councils will have no control over the machines and venues operating in
their district.
"These figures show how little control this bill will give to communities. The Government should be ashamed that some
territorial authorities have no control over pokie machines at all," said Ms Bradford.
Ms Bradford said the Government's latest amendments go in the wrong direction. The Lotteries Commission will be allowed
to be conduct lotteries on the internet, while the gambling industry would have a greater say in the development of the
Problem Gambling Strategy at the expense of problem gambling organisations.
"How can the Government claim they are addressing problem gambling when they are simply broadening the net for addicts
while muting the voices of those trying to heal the wounds of gambling," asked Ms Bradford.
"The last thing local communities need is for gambling to be made easier for both addicts and the industry. But, I guess
that's why the term 'responsible' was removed from the Gambling Bill title."
ENDS