INDEPENDENT NEWS

Westland & Tatua Farmers In Line For Capital Bonus

Published: Tue 4 Sep 2001 12:34 AM
ACT Commerce Spokesman Stephen Franks revealed today that the fine print in Fonterra's constitution, and gaps in the Minister's regulatory package, mean that Tatua and Westland farmers get a capital advantage of as much as $3 per kg equivalent from their decision to stay out of Fonterra.
He says that nothing in the 'regulatory package' Bill winding its way through Parliament requires Fonterra to pay an exiting farmer a fair value which is full value. Instead it is to be a carefully calculated notional value per share, which could be as low as 50% of the true enterprise fair value.
"Farmers and others concerned might think it was bound to stick with fair value - silly them. Only a lawyer could see there are no constraints in the 100 or more pages of the Bill on Fonterra lowering the price to exiting farmers.
"Whatever happens, Tatua and Westland will get the true enterprise fair value on withdrawing from the Dairy Board. That is, their full proportion of the normally calculated value of the Board, (including its brands and prospects).
"Theoretically at least the shrewd Westland and Tatua farmers could take the benefit of the true fair value payment then exercise their open entry rights to rejoin Fonterra at the low entry value produced by its deep discount share price formula. Once in of course they couldn't do it again. On the next exit they would get only what other Fonterra farmers would get.
"This seems to be a result of sly drafting in the Minister's deal. The deal allowed Globalco directors to push the line, at meetings all over the country, that the new Board would have the discipline of potential fair value exit. That would restrain Board recklessness with dairy farmers' money in overseas adventures.
"Meanwhile the cunning drafters of the Bill before Parliament weren't even using the term "fair value". The Minister too might claim that he never used those words. The Bill actually includes the fair value parts of the Constitution but it doesn't tie Fonterra to stick with them.
"The Government could easily fix the problem in the regulatory package to make the law mean what people thought it would say. Whether it will do so remains to be seen," Stephen Franks said.
Ends

Next in New Zealand politics

Jacinda Ardern’s remarks following summit
By: New Zealand Government
NZTA Board refreshed and refocused
By: New Zealand Government
Climate Change Adaptation and Risk Assessment Framework
By: New Zealand Government
Mana whenua reach decision on Ihumātao land
By: RNZ
PM to visit Japan and attend the UN General Assembly
By: New Zealand Government
PM's Post-Cab 16/9/19: A Way Forward
By: The Scoop Team
Gordon Campbell on allegations of left wing media bias
By: Gordon Campbell
Tighter gun laws for the safety of all
By: New Zealand Government
New Zealand-Japan relationship strengthened
By: New Zealand Government
eGates open to Japanese travellers
By: New Zealand Government
Twyford is the issue, not the board
By: New Zealand National Party
Too little too late for funding switch from rail to road
By: New Zealand National Party
First national voluntary emissions offset guidelines
By: New Zealand Government
NCCRA a start but local focus needed
By: LGNZ
Forest & Bird calls for urgent action on ocean acidity
By: Forest And Bird
View as: DESKTOP | MOBILEWe're in BETA! Send Feedback © Scoop Media