INDEPENDENT NEWS

Fisheries Commission Is Correct To Oppose Appeal

Published: Mon 21 May 2001 01:49 PM
ACT Justice Spokesman Stephen Franks today supported the Treaty of Waitangi Fisheries Commission against critics of its involvement opposing a Privy Council Appeal over distribution of Maori fishing assets.
"Te Ohu Kai Moana is defending all of us in the Privy Council appeal by urban Maori. Critics who say the Commission should watch from the sidelines have no idea of the issues. The Commission has to act because the Government is standing by, letting injustice fester.
"The fault lies in the failure of 15 years of government to define Treaty rights. Instead the Courts have been asked to apply intellectually empty slogans like "the principles of the Treaty". They have responded with equally vacuous and unfounded notions such as "the Treaty Partnership". A responsible Minister of Justice would have ratified in law the excellent work of the Commission, and made this litigation in London unnecessary.
"This is not just a Maori v Maori squabble. If the Commission simply pretended indifference to the outcome it would be derelict. If the appeal succeeds, property rights are stolen from all of us, Pakeha as well as Maori. Urban Maori claims challenge the heart of the Treaty as a guarantee of property rights to all New Zealanders.
"The Treaty claims process works as a settlement for all New Zealanders when it compensates for wrongly seized property. It says that the Government is subject to the law, the heart element of the rule of law. It upholds the one law for all that is promised in Article 3 of the Treaty, and the traditional property rights assured by Article 2.
"If compensation for misappropriation is diverted from the descendants of those who lost the property, the settlements cannot be durable. The property was lost by identified iwi and hapu. If their compensation is siphoned off to anyone in the city who claims to have some Maori ancestry, those hapu and iwi will have legitimate new grounds for grievance. Some of the benefit may even go to descendants of iwi and hapu which helped the Crown.
"Paying treaty claim money on a pan-Maori basis is just another form of welfare entitlement determined by claimed race. Whatever the decision in London, the government will have to ensure that iwi and hapu get their entitlements.
ENDS

Next in New Zealand politics

More people getting into work
By: New Zealand Government
Boost in Whānau Ora funding to keep changing lives
By: New Zealand Government
Kaikōura $10.88 million boost in tourism & business
By: New Zealand Government
Plans to protect the future of whitebaiting announced
By: New Zealand Government
New resource for schools on climate change
By: New Zealand Government
Regulations pave way for quality medicinal cannabis
By: New Zealand Government
Gordon Campbell on a White Island inquiry
By: Gordon Campbell
7000 more young people on the dole under Labour
By: New Zealand National Party
Government failing to get Kiwis back into work
By: New Zealand National Party
Labour's soft line on welfare sees 25,000 more on benefit
By: ACT New Zealand
Benefit numbers continue upward trend
By: Lindsay Mitchell
Dunne Speaks: Turia is Right on Whanau Ora
By: Peter Dunne
Whānau Ora claim must be fast tracked, says Māori Party
By: The Maori Party
$10.98 million of PGF funding announced
By: Kaikoura District Council
Proposed whitebait rules are pitiful, won’t save native fish
By: Forest And Bird
View as: DESKTOP | MOBILEWe're in BETA! Send Feedback © Scoop Media