INDEPENDENT NEWS

Overseas Reaction To Lamb Tariffs

Published: Thu 8 Jul 1999 03:17 PM
By Jonathan Hill
The new tariff slapped on Australian and New Zealand lamb exports to the United States is big news here but it is not headline news in the American press.
CNN today reported that American lamb producers were pleased with the new tariff but were critical of the delay and thought they deserved more of a break from President Clinton.
Lorin Moench, president of the American Sheep Industry Association, is reported as saying: "We would have liked to see somewhat higher tariffs, given the very low prices of imported lamb. but the key for us is that every pound of imported lamb will now incur a tariff, which should help firm up domestic prices.'"
CNN also reported that as part of the deal US lamb producers will receive $100 million of government money to help the industry develop methods to reduce operating costs and promote lamb in the United States so that US lamb will be in a better position to compete after the tariffs end.
"The package of import relief and domestic assistance has been carefully crafted to help our lamb industry achieve sustained competitiveness, while respecting our international trade obligations," a statement from the United States Trade Department said.
The American press has also carried news that both New Zealand and Australia are planning on taking America to the World Trade Organisation to challenge the decision.
"There is no rational foundation for the American decision," said Australian Prime Minister John Howard in a statement issued by the Australian Embassy in Washington. "I will convey Australia's deep concern about the decision when I see President Clinton next Monday."
The Sydney Morning Herald reported that the Australian government was taking swift action to ease the pressure on its lamb producers.
"We are in fact going to meet with the industry to work out further responses so they can deal with the situation," said Acting Prime Minister Tim Fischer.
"But as a next step the government will pay, for up to two years, the equivalent of half the transaction levy applying to the sale of all lambs in Australia, the reduction, in effect of that levy.
"The costing of this particular proposal will be up to $10 million over these next two critical years," he said.
Both New Zealand and Australia would be calling in their American diplomats to register their disapproval.

Next in Comment

Were journalists 'just doing their job' in the political resignation of Metiria Turei?
By: Sean Phelan and Leon Salter
Gordon Campbell on the extradition of Julian Assange
By: Gordon Campbell
Gordon Campbell: Islamic State Meets 'The Searchers'
By: Gordon Campbell
Learnings From CJR Analysis of Post-ChCh Media
By: Joseph Cederwall
News Deserts; The Death March of Local Journalism
By: Joseph Cederwall
Julian Assange as Neuroses
By: Binoy Kampmark
The Effort to Relabel Julian Assange
By: Binoy Kampmark
Shredding Asylum: The Arrest of Julian Assange
By: Binoy Kampmark
Terms of Asylum and Distraction: Moreno’s Assange Problem
By: Binoy Kampmark
Grand Jury Efforts: Jailing Chelsea Manning
By: Binoy Kampmark
How You Can Be Certain The Charge Against Assange Is a Fraud
By: Caitlin Johnstone
10 Reasons Assange Should Walk Free
By: David Swanson
WikiLeaks Founder Charged in Computer Hacking Conspiracy
By: United States Department of Justice
CPJ troubled by prosecution of Julian Assange
By: Committee to Protect Journalists
The Prosecution Of Assange Is Infinitely Bigger Than Assange
By: Caitlin Johnstone
View as: DESKTOP | MOBILEWe're in BETA! Send Feedback © Scoop Media