INDEPENDENT NEWS

Review board upholds mosque attack video's classification

Published: Tue 18 Jun 2019 03:58 PM
Mosque live stream: Review board upholds video's classification, dismisses appeal
Anneke Smith, RNZ court reporter
The Film and Literature Board has rejected claims the livestream video of the Christchurch mosque attacks is fake.
Flowers near Al Noor Mosque. Photo: RNZ / Isra'a Emhail
Christchurch man Brian Johnston applied to have the video's classification reviewed after it was deemed objectionable by the Classification Office three days after the attacks.
He was granted leave to seek a review of the decision by the Secretary of the Department of Internal Affairs
In his submissions, he argued the classification needed to be lifted so New Zealanders could view it and decide for themselves.
In its decision, the board said Mr Johnston also claimed the video was "obviously not a livestream" of the 15 March attacks.
"The applicant ... is seeking to have the ban lifted on the grounds the video for whatever reason may not be real but, rather, a drill or mock up and therefore is not "in a real sense" violent or graphic."
Mr Johnston said the video was not graphic, did not incite hatred and could not reasonably be considered offensive.
He also submitted the public viewed more violence on television than what was portrayed in the video, which had already been viewed by thousands of people.
His submissions were rejected by the board which was unanimous in its decision the video's objectionable classification should remain.
"It promotes and supports the infliction of extreme violence and extreme cruelty, being the killing or maiming of persons in the mosque while they were unarmed and at prayer."
The board also found there was no need to resolve Mr Johnston's submission that the video was not a real recording.
"Even if that submission could possibly be correct, the video contains aspects which justify it being deemed to be objectionable in any case."
Chief Censor David Shanks, who classified the 17 minute video as objectionable on 18 March, welcomed the decision.
"Our hope and expectation is that this decision will support continuing efforts to limit the publication and distribution of the livestream video, so that most New Zealanders will not need to worry about themselves or their children stumbling across it or having it recommended to them.
"And, for the tiny minority who may try to continue to distribute this material to promote hate and killing, there should be no doubt that what they are doing is not just unacceptable - it is illegal."
Mr Shanks said the claim the video was fake was not a tenable argument but believed in the public's right to test his decision.
"Any time that New Zealanders' freedoms are impinged upon in any way, even for what we felt was a proper and legitimate purpose, it's really important that those decisions can be tested. So I think there's quite a liberal approach taken to granting leave."
He said members of the Film and Literature Board would have needed to analyse the footage to reach their decision.
"We appreciate that that will have been a difficult task. We in this office are well aware of the personal impacts of viewing such material.
"We also wish to acknowledge these serious impacts will have played out for many thousands of New Zealanders who inadvertently viewed this material, or had it 'recommended' to them."
The decision means the video remains under wraps. Only people with a legitimate purpose - for reporting or research - can access it by applying to the Chief Censor.
RNZ
New Zealand's public broadcaster, providing comprehensive NZ news and current affairs, specialist audio features and documentaries.
Radio New Zealand is a Crown entity established under the Radio New Zealand Act 1995. Radio New Zealand News are vital elements in our programming, providing impartial news and information to New Zealanders every day. Radio New Zealand (RNZ) provides listeners with exciting and independent radio programmes in accordance with the Radio New Zealand Charter.

Next in Comment

20 Years of the Scoop Information Ecosystem
By: Joseph Cederwall
Lyndon Hood: Better Analogies for National Pilfering Budget Data
By: Lyndon Hood
Were journalists 'just doing their job' in the political resignation of Metiria Turei?
By: Sean Phelan and Leon Salter
Gordon Campbell on the extradition of Julian Assange
By: Gordon Campbell
NZME hits 10,000 paying subscriber target early
By: BusinessDesk
Budget 2019 - Scoop Full Coverage
By: The Scoop Team
Julian Assange as Neuroses
By: Binoy Kampmark
The Effort to Relabel Julian Assange
By: Binoy Kampmark
Shredding Asylum: The Arrest of Julian Assange
By: Binoy Kampmark
Terms of Asylum and Distraction: Moreno’s Assange Problem
By: Binoy Kampmark
Grand Jury Efforts: Jailing Chelsea Manning
By: Binoy Kampmark
How You Can Be Certain The Charge Against Assange Is a Fraud
By: Caitlin Johnstone
10 Reasons Assange Should Walk Free
By: David Swanson
WikiLeaks Founder Charged in Computer Hacking Conspiracy
By: United States Department of Justice
View as: DESKTOP | MOBILEWe're in BETA! Send Feedback © Scoop Media