Queens Wharf decision 'sinks Goff's campaign promise'

Published: Wed 24 Apr 2019 11:03 AM
Queens Wharf decision sinks Auckland mayor Phil Goff's campaign promise - harbour development objectors
Matthew Theunissen, Reporter
Consent has been granted to develop a 90m concrete platform extension into Auckland's Waitematā Harbour, allowing huge cruise ships to berth, despite a passionate and active opposition.
An indicative picture of the mooring dolphin on track to be built at Queens Wharf. Photo: supplied
Auckland's Mayor Phil Goff on the 2016 campaign trail said "not one more metre of the harbour should be infilled for commercial activity", but that appears to be dead in the water, after a panel of three independent commissioners agreed yesterday to allow the construction of the two new concrete ship mooring "dolphins".
Mr Goff stressed that the extension was temporary, with commissioners stipulating in their report that it be removed after 'no more than 15 years when Captain Cook Wharf becomes operational for cruise ships'.
"They said that the negative impacts on the environment 'could be avoided, remedied or mitigated' and that these were outweighed by the real positive economic and social benefits," Mr Goff said.
"They noted in particular that the dolphins were not there permanently, that they'd be in place for less than 15 years."
The report lays out a number of conditions the council's construction arm, Panuku, will need to adhere to including environmental best practices and mana whenua are to be consulted.
There were 329 submissions on the application, 44 in support and 284 opposed.
Michael Goldwater, from the group Stop Stealing Our Harbour, said the decision was a huge disappointment.
"Mayor Goff and Auckland Council have valued corporate welfare and the cruise industry over the long-term wellbeing of the harbour," he said.
"Phil Goff promised that there would be no more concrete in the harbour for commercial use and he has failed to keep that promise."
Julie Stout, from the urban and architectural design watchdog Urban Auckland, said it would compromise the view and use of the harbour.
"Queens Wharf is the prime single wharf in our city. It's where the harbour meets the sea and it should be a fantastic people space.
"What they're proposing is to put a two big 15m-in-diameter concrete mooring pads that stick 90m out into the handle. This is completely inappropriate."
Royal New Zealand Yacht Squadron general manager Hayden Porter said the structure would be a navigational hazard in the already-crowded part of the harbour.
"It's decreasing the amount of usable space within the harbour for, ultimately, very few visits per year.
I think everyone agrees we want those ships to come and that there are huge economic benefits, but we also feel that there was some other options that should have been considered that wouldn't pose such a long-term problem."
The cruise ship industry was banking on those economic benefits, however.
Craig Harris from the country's cruise ship agent ISS-McKay said without the wharf expansion, the city - and the country - would miss out.
"Auckland Airport benefits; the hotels benefit; we employ up to 200 to 300 taxis and buses when this happens; there's restaurants," he said.
"And a lot of people use Auckland as the gateway to tours before or after joining their ship. Our company, at the moment, has cancelled eight of those ships because there's been no facility."
Objectors have until 15 May to lodge an appeal.
New Zealand's public broadcaster, providing comprehensive NZ news and current affairs, specialist audio features and documentaries.
Radio New Zealand is a Crown entity established under the Radio New Zealand Act 1995. Radio New Zealand News are vital elements in our programming, providing impartial news and information to New Zealanders every day. Radio New Zealand (RNZ) provides listeners with exciting and independent radio programmes in accordance with the Radio New Zealand Charter.

Next in Comment

Were journalists 'just doing their job' in the political resignation of Metiria Turei?
By: Sean Phelan and Leon Salter
Gordon Campbell on the extradition of Julian Assange
By: Gordon Campbell
Gordon Campbell: Islamic State Meets 'The Searchers'
By: Gordon Campbell
Learnings From CJR Analysis of Post-ChCh Media
By: Joseph Cederwall
News Deserts; The Death March of Local Journalism
By: Joseph Cederwall
Julian Assange as Neuroses
By: Binoy Kampmark
The Effort to Relabel Julian Assange
By: Binoy Kampmark
Shredding Asylum: The Arrest of Julian Assange
By: Binoy Kampmark
Terms of Asylum and Distraction: Moreno’s Assange Problem
By: Binoy Kampmark
Grand Jury Efforts: Jailing Chelsea Manning
By: Binoy Kampmark
How You Can Be Certain The Charge Against Assange Is a Fraud
By: Caitlin Johnstone
10 Reasons Assange Should Walk Free
By: David Swanson
WikiLeaks Founder Charged in Computer Hacking Conspiracy
By: United States Department of Justice
CPJ troubled by prosecution of Julian Assange
By: Committee to Protect Journalists
The Prosecution Of Assange Is Infinitely Bigger Than Assange
By: Caitlin Johnstone
View as: DESKTOP | MOBILEWe're in BETA! Send Feedback © Scoop Media